Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Turns out Josh Johnson owns the AFCS

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Wow Johnson didn't read that blitz at all

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Who is this dude who thinks winning today makes the currently 8-6 Titans a 10 win team

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

EvilBlackRailgun posted:

Third string hail marry incoming

Kaep would have the arm for this

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
lmfao what a dick

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Man Lamar really screwed the pooch there

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Rivers getting emotional, still concussed from last week I guess

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
oh man rivers got killed on that

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
lol the penalty was because Allen couldn't stop whining at the refs

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Rivers of tears

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Grittybeard posted:

Make up call?

Doesn't really work as a makeup call since there was no chance at a completion

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Kawalimus posted:

That would've been a hard throw for a lot of QBs. Jackson isn't ready to make that yet.

Then maybe don't call that play on 4th and goal

or is that the point you're making

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Chargers can't get out of their own way

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Despera posted:

go for it and should have kicked a fg are by definition mutually exclusive

He's saying he wanted them to go for it with a good playcall but with what they tried they'd have been better off kicking it, it's not that hard to understand

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
IIRC end zone fades are a pretty low percentage play even when you're not running it with an inexperienced QB

Despera posted:

I dont see "with a good playcall" its not that hard to understand

You can't be this dumb

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Why is forward progress not negated when a player pulls the ball back without being touched

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Despera posted:

Also good job retconning a football game

What the gently caress are you even talking about :lol:

Sorry your desire to dunk on Kawalimus was ill advised, saying you want your team to go for it implies you want them to run a smart playcall that isn't doomed from the start without needing to be explicitly stated

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Elephanthead posted:

That was a bad spot he took the ball back himself he wasn't touched that should have been a turn over on downs.

Yeah but that happens all the time and I've never understood it

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Oof, this is what Kawalimus's reputation has wrought

If my team, for example, went for it on 4th and 9 and ran an inside handoff, even if I'd been cheerleading for them to go for it I'd say after that playcall they'd have been better off kicking it :shrug:

End zone fades are dumb and bad anyway

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Despera posted:

revise (an aspect of a fictional work) retrospectively, typically by introducing a piece of new information that imposes a different interpretation on previously described events.

Do i need to work out for your dumb rear end the new piece of information is

The only new information was what the bad playcall was, and given that new information it was determined they'd have been better off kicking it. It's a criticism of the playcall, not the decision to go for it

Why is this so hard to understand

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Elephanthead posted:

My team fakes a punt by sending everyone but two players to the sideline then snaps against 5 defenders so I would take the inside handoff.

Look at this loving revisionist history right here

Ghost Dog posted:

*sniffing* i said...i said to go for it but i meant for you to get it



im not actually in on insulting kawa over that or anything i just dont get why you need to stan for him intruder, the man has no feeling but constant mirth towards the world and is virtually indestructible via ownage

Because in this instance he's right?

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Despera posted:

Yay i dont have to work it out for you. Also a bad playcall is part of the decision when you ask for them to go for it.

Way to edit out the rest of the post that invalidates this dumb troll attempt

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Demon Of The Fall posted:

COME ON CHARGERS YOU FUCKS

Go Ravens IMO, terrified of the Colts in the playoffs and lol if you think the Titans are beating them next week

Despera posted:

Hey i want for them to go for it everytime they score and didnt want them to go for it everytime they dont

:rolleye:

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Despera posted:

Its a quality post by your standards

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Chargers first with no flag :aaa:

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
"False start literally everyone but the center" since the center apparently didn't know the snapcount

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Chris James 2 posted:

While you're in the habit of defending Kawalimus, I sincerely want to know the 7th dimensional chess behind this being cool/good/accurate, #enlightenme

This is dumb. My agreeing with him on this one point doesn't mean I'm going to agree with every insane thing that comes out of his mouth

I have to admit though, "You can't criticize a playcall if you wanted them to run a play to begin with" is a bold gambit

e: uhhhhhh not sure about that flag

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Ok I can kind of see how that would draw a flag

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Great job dude, well done

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Ghost Dog posted:

man 30 free yards on some nonsense calls is rough

You can argue the first, no idea how you argue the second

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves

Utopian Mind posted:

Maybe I’m just looking at past games with rose tinted glasses but is the reffing across the league noticeably declining? I feel like the reffing is impacting games a lot more than anyone would really consider reasonable.

I wish Jeff Triplette would just disappear

*monkey paw curls*

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Snatch that man's chain

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Would've laughed really hard if Lamar had gotten flagged for throwing the ball so hard to the ref

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
GIVE ME A 64 YARD ATTEMPT

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
give me a dang new record

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
drat, looked like it had a chance

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Who thought there'd be more offense in the Gabbert vs Johnson bowl than Chargers/Ravens?

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
This Pepsi "icing the kicker" commercial is incredibly dumb

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
lol what a terrible fumble

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply