Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Fast and the Furious 1-8 marathon with the wife. These are loving awful. Each one is the worst one.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

checkplease posted:

The fast films are fun action with big cars and solid stunt work. And maybe the only minority led blockbuster franchise.

They're still really bad

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Dumb Money. This loving movie can hodl my dilz with its diamond hands until I nut to the moon and then take me out for chicken tendies.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Data Graham posted:

Ferrari - Well nothing much seems to be happening in this movie, just a lot of rack-focus stunts and cameras being placed on the ground, lots of family drama and not a lot of racing, not sure what all the buzz is ab—
:stare::stare::stare::stare::stare:
Haven't seen it, don't want to see it, so please spoil the :stare:

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Thanksgiving - Eli Roth once again shows he doesn't have any business being behind a camera in any way, shape or form. What a tremendous piece of poo poo movie.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Erin M. Fiasco posted:

The House of Yes: Parker Posey should retroactively get the Oscar. Love how unhinged and dense the dialogue is and how uncomfortable the atmosphere is. Shockingly great. If this movie was released in modern day I feel like the inciting incident would have been 9/11.

I don't think the movie would have been improved by removing the best scene.

I love this movie but hate Tori Spelling in it. She's just terrible.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
The Beekeeper was a really sad and tired attempt at a revenge flick with a kinda-sorta-not-quite John Wick thing going on about secret assassin groups. The action was dull, the editing was sloppy and the characters had no character. It wanted to be quippy and wink at the audience but also be serious about how lovely people who defraud the elderly are (seriously, that's the plot). It just felt like a big budget movie made entirely by amateurs trying to hit above their weight. Really wasted Jeremy Irons too.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Ocean's Eleven, Twelve and Thirteen
Never seen these before so I binged them all.
Eleven - Decent heist flick with a bit too much magic technology mumbo-jumbo for my liking. The cast is charismatic but with so many it's hard to really latch on to them. It's obviously a Clooney/Pitt vehicle, but still. Bernie Mac is criminally underused. Don Cheadle has the worst fake English accent I've ever heard.
Twelve - Overly complicated plot that's completely undone by the terrible contrivance where the first 80% of the movie doesn't matter at all because the last 20% shows "what really happened" which renders everything that came before pointless. Bernie Mac was so criminally underused that they just threw him in a jail cell for half the movie. Cheadle's accent is somehow worse? The capoeira laser scene was hilariously stupid.
Thirteen - Back to hotel heists. Way too much magic technology poo poo. Way too much suspension of disbelief for me (both chunnel drills are allowed to dig under the strip with no problems from the city?, etc.) Bernie Mac is criminally underused. Complete waste of a Bob Einstein cameo. Cheadle is barely in the movie, but the accent still sucks.

Overall I give the series a meh/10. If I don't see another crash zoom for a year, I'll be fine.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

In Training posted:

You gonna check out Oceans Eight.
I doubt it. I'm pretty heisted out and I really don't care for Awkwafina or Mindy Kaling.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
It's actually really entertaining and way better than the other adaptation, Trucks.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Gaius Marius posted:

Vertigo loving hate when you see a film this good cause it's gonna make everything else seem worse for the next month. Perfect hosed up toxic relationship mixed with a wife killing and a psychosexual look at make neuroses. Literally what more could you want and oh yeah it's loving gorgeous.
So I watched this for the first time tonight based on this review. Uh...I didn't care for it. JStew is too old and Kim Novak is too young for that relationship. Stewart's weird control fetish at the end prior to his realization of the truth is really hard to take nowadays. I also can't overlook how hokey the love angle is portrayed. Scotty spends literally three days with her and they confess their love. I realize it's a movie (and a '50's movie at that) but it's just so over the top and melodramatic that it becomes eye-rolling to the extreme. Other than that, the film look great and the soundtrack is amazing.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

In Training posted:

Well yeah, she's lying to him. It's supposed to be a bit of a send up of Hollywood romanticism, and Scotty is the sucker who buys into it bc of his own insecurities. It's cool
Well, no, she actually falls in love with him. That's the point of the whole last act.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Oppenheimer - Despite being overlong by 40 minutes (usual for Nolan), having some weird directorial decisions (usual for Nolan), sometimes having the soundtrack drown out the dialog (usual for Nolan), and getting a little JFK there every once and a while, this was a great movie. The soundtrack, actors and cinematography were all top-notch. Great film.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
It's a revenge fantasy for Pit Viper-wearing divorced dads/red-pilled BJJ bros/wanna-be operators. That's it. That's the appeal.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Seconds, the 1966 John Frankenheimer film recently came to my attention from a Criterion Closet video. I'm not sure what I think about it. There's a lot of handheld and extreme closeup used to give a sense of extreme paranoia and alienation which works. There's also some almost-Steadicam footage that reminded me of the technique that Darren Aronofsky used in Pi and Requiem For A Dream, but this was done 10 years before the Steadicam was invented, so, yeah, really cool. I know nothing about movie making techniques from an historical standpoint, so maybe this was more common that I'm aware of, but I was impressed. Unfortunately, the movie itself was kind of a dud. The first third certainly got you invested in the story and did a really good job of requiring the viewer to read between the lines as to what was happening. Unfortunately, the mid-part became far flabbier. There's this whole hippy/Bacchanal wine stomping section which I suppose was intended to show the protagonist's "rebirth" but just didn't work, especially considering that the scene directly after has the lead completely fail to assimilate into his new life. Unfortunately, the finale makes the whole movie seem like an extended Twilight Zone episode.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Lovely Dark and Deep. What a piece of poo poo. It was like watching an LP of an Eastern European psychological horror walking sim.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Archer666 posted:

Poor Things - Been a while since I enjoyed a movie like this. Just sucked me right in from start to finish.
And speaking of Lanthimos, my wife and I watch The Lobster last night. I enjoyed it enough, but I don't really have any idea what it was trying to convey, if anything. It was humorous enough without ever making us laugh. Neither of us like any kind of animal harm in movies. Unfortunately this one starts with a donkey getting shot and gets worse. We also found the ending pretty unsatisfying. It was just a weird story that happens and then ends.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
I thought it (especially the ending) was laughably bad, but Dever brings it. My wife really likes the show Unbelievable which she's great in.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Magic Hate Ball posted:

I'm going to suggest that the ideal way to watch Skinamarink is not

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Just finished Poor Things. loving amazing.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Maurice - being gay in Edwardian England really sucked. Good Merchant-Ivory stuff here.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Looker (1981) - 45 years before deepfakes were A Thing, Looker posited the existence of perfect computer generated actors and the lengths that a corporation would go to to advance that technology. Unfortunately the movie itself is terribly boring and laughably confusing. Why is the company trying to frame the surgeon who's making these women "perfect" before killing them off? Why is there a subplot about a light gun that causes the victim to go into a trance, and why does it seemingly make the wielder invisible, sorta? Why did the film makers waste Albert Finney so completely to the point of having the last 40 minutes of the movie be him silently walking around in a security guard uniform and hiding behind counters on kitchen TV sets? I'm pretty sure this movie was made just because the Michael Crichton wanted to get Susan Dey naked.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
The Vourdalak (2023) - what an odd little vampire movie. A French nobleman travels through Eastern Europe in the 1700s and due to unfortunate circumstances ends up lodging with a very strange family, the patriarch of which has been missing for 6 days. Before he left, he told his children not to allow him back into the home if he returns even a second after 6PM on the 6th day, or else he will be a vourdalak, a Slavic vampire that feeds on family members. Well, the father shows back up at the stroke of 6. The movie has a very hazy, dreamlike quality to it and feels very much like a lost 70's European horror flick. The "special effects" choices are quite interesting and actually work for what the movie is going for imo. Such an odd little film. Worth checking out.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Immaculate (2024) - Rosemary's Nunnery. Absolute crap. A perfect example of the problem with most horror movies simply going down a list of spoopy tropes and checking them off. Seriously, don't waste your time.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Fast and Furious 9, aka F9 (2021) - I still don't understand how the FnF series does it; each movie in the franchise is the worst movie of the franchise. It doesn't matter what movie you compare. F5 is worse than F3, yet F3 is somehow worse than F5. F9 continues with that truism by being the worst movie in the franchise. I wish my wife would stop making me watch this god-forsaken series, but she likes watching car wrecks.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Fast X aka Fast and Furious 10 (2023) - The worst one of the franchise, but still not as bad a 1-9. Momoa knew exactly what kind of movie he was in and at least looked like he was having a good time. VD has never been good in anything but this is his career nadir. Just absolutely phoning it in for this one.

Late Night With the Devil (2024) - Man, what a disappointment. First, on a positive note, the set design and costuming was pretty good. Now for the negatives. When movies fake recordings of live broadcasts, they always fail for one reason: the acting always feels rehearsed and not at all naturalistic. This doesn't seem to bother other people I've mentioned this to, but it's a big annoyance for me. The special effects were pretty terrible. I realize this was low budget but the movie had like 7 or 8 production companies attached to it and the special effects looked worse than poo poo people do for fun in Blender on YouTube. The ending was incredibly stupid and telegraphed. Just laughably bad storytelling. Finally they really did James Randi dirty.

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.

Gaius Marius posted:

Up there with Burt Reynolds in Boogie Nights for best older actor acting in a young hotshot writer director's film about the porn industry and not really understanding the film they're in.
Are you trying to say that Burt Reynolds was anything but perfect in Boogie Nights? Just the worst take if so.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Oldstench
Jun 29, 2007

Let's talk about where you're going.
Happiness is an amazing movie and more people should be blindly recommended it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply