|
it's called a ctf
|
#
¿
Dec 26, 2018 23:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
is mongoloid ableist? i always figured that was a racist one (and a very strange thing to name your database after, in any case)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2019 04:38
|
|
|
it's exactly the same reason calling your package manager a racial slur is a bad idea. no-one cares that you got there by shortening "raccoon"
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2019 00:26
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:did this happen I don't want it in my google history http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2018-February/094769.html
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2019 00:59
|
|
|
if a device on your internal network asks your router about what other devices on your internal network it can talk to, and your router then decides to open that device up to external connections from anywhere on the internet, it's the router that's the secfuck
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2019 14:36
|
|
|
Wait, so the validation APIs don't give you any way to tell "hey, here's the trust chain the platform used to determine that this certificate is valid"? Are there any examples from whoever designed that api showing you how it's supposed to be used? Are you just supposed to do 100% of the certificate validation yourself and not rely on the platform doing anything?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2019 03:41
|
|
|
Though thinking about it, in common use cases (you're using certificate pinning to ensure you're talking to a server you control), wouldn't it be easy enough to fail validation if the certificate bag contains more certs than you expect? Like, you expect it to contain the leaf cert, your pinned intermediate, and that intermediate's root cert, and absolutely nothing else.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2019 04:03
|
|
|
Penisface posted:shouldn't there be the bit where you configure the passes and define the salt as well? There should never be a bit where you define the salt - if you're storing a new password, it generates it randomly; if you're checking an existing password, the salt is stored in the hash string that you're checking against. Configuring parameters like number of passes is part of storing a new password as well (the parameters chosen get stored in the hash string too), but really the library should just have sane defaults.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2019 12:31
|
|
|
if only everyone could have that privilege
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2019 16:01
|
|
|
more like should-be-in-prison book. not even joking, lock up whoever made the decision, and also their entire management chain including zuckerberg (they all knew exactly what was going on).
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2019 04:17
|
|
|
"certification" is not "certificate". Sounds like they pinky-promised not to misuse the enterprise program and apple gave them a new cert.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2019 01:03
|
|
|
Partycat posted:the article also explicitly says they retain control of the encryption keys . they release data based on Chinese law , for iCloud , which you can turn off. the claim is that they're selling out dissidents to a totalitarian regime that is rounding up minorities in interment camps and has a history of human rights abuses "we only do it when then the totalitarian regime asks us to" is not much of a fig leaf there
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2019 13:13
|
|
|
kinda convenient that apple catches someone else loving up shortly after they've had a major fuckup of their own and would want people to stop talking about it
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2019 06:20
|
|
|
how in the heck does this get certified as a class anyway
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2019 08:07
|
|
|
one thousand two hundred and thirty four people is a pretty nice total for a movie monster
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2019 08:03
|
|
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:you joke but wasn't there some idiot bitcoin wallet generator that was just returning the dame key for everyone because the domain that they sourced entropy from expired/they were total idiots iirc they were making http requests to a random number generator site, then that site turned off that feature and started returning an error page telling you to use https, and the app dutifully used the error page as its "random" bytes
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2019 00:22
|
|
|
hey, it's a good way to screen for applicants that can follow orders to the letter even though they're pointless and stupid
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2019 12:50
|
|
|
not actively sheltering nazis is censorship now? when did that happen?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2019 03:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
The Fool posted:There's a difference between actively sheltering and just treating them the same as every other customer. nah
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2019 04:52
|
|