|
power botton posted:bad news for you nerds, catalina also makes ublock "no longer exist" ublock origin for safari has been dead for a while
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 22:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 12:21 |
|
|
hi everyone firefox still working great over here bless
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 22:56
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:ublock origin for safari has been dead for a while until catalina you just had to click the "yes i know it could make by browser slower" button
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 00:30
|
|
|
Lambert posted:Bring back gopher.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 02:37
|
|
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:hi everyone firefox recently dropped gopher support which is not great
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 02:38
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:until catalina you just had to click the "yes i know it could make by browser slower" button it’s not getting updates anymore and barely works
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 04:42
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:firefox recently dropped gopher support which is not great when was the last time you used it
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 04:43
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:when was the last time you used it circa 2011 clearly
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 05:21
|
|
|
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/745Google posted:Dear Developer, We routinely review items in the Chrome Web Store for compliance with our Program policies to ensure a safe and trusted experience for our users. Your Google Chrome item, "uBlock Origin development build", with ID: cgbcahbpdhpcegmbfconppldiemgcoii did not comply with our policies and was removed from the Google Chrome Web Store. Your item did not comply with the following section of our policy: An extension should have a single purpose that is clear to users. Do not create an extension that requires users to accept bundles of unrelated functionality, such as an email notifier and a news headline aggregator. If two pieces of functionality are clearly separate, they should be put into two different extensions, and users should have the ability to install and uninstall them separately. For example, an extension that provides a broad array of functionalities on the New Tab Page/ Start-up Page but also changes the default search are better delivered as separate extensions, so that users can select the services they want. For more information on the new Chrome extensions quality policy, please refer to the FAQ: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/single_purpose If you’d like to re-submit it, please modify the item so that it complies with the policies, then re-publish it in your developer dashboard. Please reply to this email for issues regarding this item removal. *Please keep in mind that after you resubmit your item, it will not be immediately published live in the store. All re-submitted items undergo a strict compliance review and will be re-published only if the item passes that review. *Important Note Repeated or egregious violations of the policies may result in your developer account being banned from the store. This may also result in the suspension of related Google services associated with your Google account. All re-submitted items will continue to be subject to the Chrome Web store program policies and terms of service. Thank you for your cooperation, Chrome Web Store Team --------------------------- Developer Terms of Service: https://developers.google.com/chrome/web-store/terms Program Policies: https://developers.google.com/chrome/web-store/program_policies Branding Guidelines: https://developers.google.com/chrome/web-store/branding
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 01:37
|
|
|
his response to this is pretty beautiful: quote:I won't re-submit to try to have the dev build restored in the CWS, uBO does not "bundle unrelated functionality" as implied in the email, thus closing as wontfix. but then followed by quote:Just for the sake of having tried, I submitted 1.22.5rc2, and I received the same exact answer as above. lol at anyone who was using google spyware
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 02:00
|
|
|
wow this is pretty brazen and consumer-hostile i mean they are also changing the api to make useful ad blockers impossible, but that at least has the fig leaf of "performance" or some such poo poo "extension quality" is a pretty weak fig leaf
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 02:04
|
|
|
chome is the new IE. stop using it unless you're an idiot
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
Install this for a premium web browsing experience https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/nonad-block/mjdphmpknkepficogfmnfhabmlngggip 
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 02:44
|
|
|
well i guess thats that 
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 02:48
|
|
|
chrome has been a bad idea since day one there was never a point at which a browser from an advertising firm sounded like a good idea
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
dumbass web "developers" hosed up the internet forever with javascript and chome
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
I’m pleading the “Shaggar is right” amendment on this one
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:28
|
|
|
firefox is the only good browser now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:31
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:dumbass web "developers" hosed up the internet forever with javascript and chome javascript basically gave us chrome like the reason for chrome to exist was to run javascript really, really fast, so that the ad company could make money off of more-engaging web applications dhtml and js were a mistake
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:31
|
|
|
Google fixed it (this time) after it caused a mass panic in the Chrome reddit, apparently
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:33
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:Google fixed it (this time) after it caused a mass panic in the Chrome reddit, apparently what does it mean for google to have "fixed it" in this case?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
It actually looks like they released Raymond Hill's final version to the Chrome Web Store at the bottom. But as has been pointed out, it won't matter very soon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
chredge gaining a reason to exist pretty quick
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 08:17
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:chome is the new IE. stop using it unless you're an idiot
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 09:12
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:firefox is the only good browser now. Shaggar posted:dumbass web "developers" hosed up the internet forever with javascript and chome lotta correct opinions itt
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 11:03
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:firefox is the only good browser now. firefox needs to hurry up and support pinch zoom correctly (I.e. how it works in surfari)
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 12:06
|
|
|
failfox is extremely bad. Edge is the only good browser but its being hosed up into a chome version.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 15:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 16:25
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:firefox needs to hurry up and support pinch zoom correctly (I.e. how it works in surfari) theres a hobbled version of it through this add on but its finicky depending on the os https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-touch-zoom
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:failfox is extremely bad. Edge is the only good browser but its being hosed up into a chome version. webkit is dead to me
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 17:42
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:theres a hobbled version of it through this add on but its finicky depending on the os lmao wait what? firefox doesnt support pinch zoom?? even fuckin edge supports that, right? wow.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 17:56
|
|
|
firefox has been making rapid progress during the last couple of years, but it's still playing catch up from the years when mozilla diverted most of their efforts to trying to build their dumb me-too phone os that went nowhere
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 18:08
|
|
|
Outside of recently when they somehow hosed up and broke everyone's addons I've had no issue with Firefox for years.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 18:25
|
|
|
Also, when they push ads or data mining extensions. Why would you trust Mozzarella.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
at least with chome you know the ads and data mining are baked in, which is better somehow?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 18:49
|
|
|
Just uncheck the box for ads and data mining in Firefox, problem solved.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 19:06
|
|
|
failfox is perfect for me
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 19:15
|
|
|
safari is the best browser yet devised by man (one man in particular) op
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 19:18
|
|
|
Safari doesn't have real ad blocking and is always way behind on web standards.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 19:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 12:21 |
|
|
Lambert posted:Safari ... is always way behind on web standards. well loving good
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 19:27
|
|