|
Eschat0n posted:A man who is alone on a desert island may be said to possess wealth. He may have tools which he has made, and food which he has gathered. If he encounters another person, these items may be bartered or sold. This basic concept doesn't decohere at larger scales or lose importance, either - fundamentally, wealth = work. Are you more interested in "capital", "value" or "abundance" here?
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2019 10:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 20:05 |
|
Eschat0n posted:Value is a property of work.
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2019 17:10 |
|
Typo posted:it seems to me that you are trying really, really hard to describe the labor theory of value without reading anything about labor theory of value. I don't agree with the LTV but it's like you are going to incredible length to rediscover 19th century economic concepts. OP, while I don't disagree that Capital is an important piece of work in the economic development of the kind of ideas you're looking at, I think you'd get more yourself out of The Wealth of Nations. Or, if you prefer, start with the Shmoop summary of Wealth of Nations, especially books 1 and 2.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2019 18:44 |