|
"we are gonna have to exploit somebody" seems to be the thing you are trying to prove but you aren't being very clear about that for some reason and also not proving it very well Wealth as the ability to decide who gets exploited and to what ends?
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2019 22:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 02:36 |
|
|
Can we keep money? I know wealth is bad, but getting rid of money seems real loving dumb. People will just invent something else to be money.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2019 00:44
|
|
|
Eschat0n posted:Intellectual property like copyright, patent, and trademark are to be viewed explicitly as (perhaps necessary) inefficiencies. gently caress all of this nonsense, tbqh. Calling a IP "inefficiencies" is overly reductive. Without IP protection there's less/no incentive to work hard to create something original, which is a plain worse state to be in, not just a 'less effecient' one.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2019 15:02
|
|
|
I caught the inherent stupidity of the first part but not the immediate contradiction. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2019 15:29
|
|
|
Or more effort into connecting your mishmash of ideas to your lovely policy conclusions.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2019 16:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 02:36 |
|
|
Eschat0n posted:nation states absolutely serve a useful function, and yes they must absolutely take taxes. but that tax should not be mandatory. That is the position I take.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2019 18:16
|
|