|
Taintrunner posted:rebuttals are for those who aren’t lower than loving dirt. shut the gently caress up liberal
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 18:12 |
|
|
Gringostar posted:shut the gently caress up liberal don't sign your posts
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
Gringostar posted:but also that they attack other orgs for releasing information that they refuse to That sucks and I don't like that.  How do they do that, like just poo poo talking them or actually trying to do something like a ddos or?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
COMRADES posted:That sucks and I don't like that. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/717458064324964352?s=20
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:43
|
|
|
Okay. How does this undermine the veracity of the documents they leak?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:44
|
|
|
Mecha Gojira posted:Devil Cracker Nation Imprisons and Tortures Trans Woman to Coerce Testimony
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:45
|
|
|
Captain Billy Pissboy posted:Okay. How does this undermine the veracity of the documents they leak? please quote me where I've said what they've chosen to link has been wrong you're like the 3-4th person to try to strawman that argument on me here what I've said is that they're bad because they curate what to leak which is bad for a supposed transparency org and they they bash other transparency orgs that attack right wing billionaires... which apparently a bunch of fake rear end leftists seem to be a-o-k with itt
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
Gringostar posted:please quote me where I've said what they've chosen to link has been wrong So they selectively publish accurate information but are mean to people on Twitter. That's why you're mad at them?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 18:01
|
|
|
he literally can't fathom prizing real information over the personal politics of the assholes leaking it lmfao
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
Captain Billy Pissboy posted:So they selectively publish accurate information but are mean to people on Twitter. That's why you're mad at them? giving cover to right wing orgs and billionaires is a bit worse so i don't know why you chose to leave that one out
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 18:04
|
|
|
Gringostar posted:shut the gently caress up liberal lol nice try OCCRP is funded by those though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 18:04
|
|
|
Gringostar posted:giving cover to right wing orgs and billionaires is a bit worse so i don't know why you chose to leave that one out "they selectively publish accurate information but are mean to people on Twitter" pretty much covers that actually. Are they somehow preventing other information from being leaked?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 18:06
|
|
|
assange is a poo poo person and has taken wikileaks in an obviously partisan direction... ...but no one knew that in 2010 when WikiLeaks mostly just published stuff that damaged US imperialism and the military-industrial complex
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
basic hitler posted:he literally can't fathom prizing real information over the personal politics of the assholes leaking it lmfao but the real information caused mother to lose so people need to be put in cages
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 20:42
|
|
|
Regardless of whatever reason she deserves to indefinite political detention, it really warms my heart to see folks from both sides of the aisle really respecting the hell out of her gender identity.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 22:05
|
|
|
Fiend posted:Regardless of whatever reason she deserves to indefinite political detention, it really warms my heart to see folks from both sides of the aisle really respecting the hell out of her gender identity. But NAZIS
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 22:20
|
|
|
basic hitler posted:It really really doesnt matter what the politics of the people invplved are if the leaks are real and they are so vOv
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 22:44
|
|
|
Gringostar posted:it's not that they just selectively release information (which on its own is bad for any transparency org which they claim to be) but also that they attack other orgs for releasing information that they refuse to didn't wikileaks try to dump a whole buncha macron's stuff right before the french election during their media blackout and people immediately noticed fake stuff in it or was that someone else
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 22:57
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:didn't wikileaks try to dump a whole buncha macron's stuff right before the french election during their media blackout and people immediately noticed fake stuff in it iirc they didn't dump them but they along with the rest of the alt right amplified the hell out of them, all using identical phrasing to get it into the google algorithm
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 00:00
|
|
|
drat that girl fuckin loves going to prison
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 00:10
|
|
|
So is she just doing this to protest sealed grand jury investigations, since she's got immunity?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 02:23
|
|
|
I'mliterally the only nonliberal poster itt
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
For what its worth I'm glad that julian Assange has been arrested for textbook contempt
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 02:35
|
|
|
She knows that if she tells the truth about Seth rich she's next
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 03:37
|
|
|
Byolante posted:She knows that if she tells the truth about Seth rich she's next gas thread, ban op
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 04:01
|
|
|
gas thread permaban every sick gently caress itt trying to justify Chelsea’s imprisonment
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 04:05
|
|
|
Imagine calling yourself a leftist while defending anything America does
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
GoluboiOgon posted:
Is this real, she stayed friends with a government snitch? Jfc chelsea manning needs
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 04:39
|
|
|
Fiend posted:Regardless of whatever reason she deserves to indefinite political detention, it really warms my heart to see folks from both sides of the aisle really respecting the hell out of her gender identity. This reads like an onion headline
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 07:11
|
|
|
30.5 Days posted:This reads like an onion headline He's got to post his hot takes somewhere now he's been sacked by mic dot com (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 07:37
|
|
|
30.5 Days posted:This reads like an onion headline Did you not read that twitter exchange posted itt? A lib and 'moderate republican' literally had that conversation.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 14:44
|
|
|
Byolante posted:He's got to post his hot takes somewhere now he's been sacked by mic dot com Hey - not cool.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 15:17
|
|
|
Chelsea manning is still in jail https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1109516687223808006?s=19
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2019 11:25
|
|
|
Chelsea was sentenced without a jury trial for direct criminal contempt right? I haven’t seen any mention of her sentence’s duration, but constitutionally she could be imprisoned for another 5 months.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 19:57
|
|
|
she hasn't been charged with anything because they don't need to charge her with anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 20:04
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:Chelsea was sentenced she was not because grand juries don't NEED to. the usa is a devil nation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 20:05
|
|
|
Al! posted:she hasn't been charged with anything because they don't need to charge her with anything I thought she was being held for contempt? In normal courts a judge can charge someone for criminal contempt, find them guilty, and sentence them to up to 6 months all without any formal proceedings whatsoever. Is that different when a grand jury is involved?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 20:51
|
|
|
Coolness Averted posted:yeah, and they're going to torture her again, her lawyer's request to have her put in home confinement or otherwise put in a situation where her medical needs are met has been rejected They are doing this to someone that was pardoned by a goddamn President and they openly don't give a gently caress about it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 22:02
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I thought she was being held for contempt? In normal courts a judge can charge someone for criminal contempt, find them guilty, and sentence them to up to 6 months all without any formal proceedings whatsoever. Is that different when a grand jury is involved? there are a ton of different flavors of contempt, not all of which have maximum durations the current US record for longest term of imprisonment for contempt of court is fourteen years
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 18:12 |
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I thought she was being held for contempt? In normal courts a judge can charge someone for criminal contempt, find them guilty, and sentence them to up to 6 months all without any formal proceedings whatsoever. Is that different when a grand jury is involved? short version: Massively, yes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 22:20
|
|