|
twilight struggle 2 when
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2019 23:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 13:20 |
|
|
new and better ways to kill people is one area of technology you should never doubt america can and will improve on
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 00:14
|
|
|
Grapplejack posted:WW3 is a nuclear war. No one wins. actually i think you'll find the dead win extremely hard
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 00:59
|
|
|
Cerebral Bore posted:skeleton empire gonna rise from the ashes and it owns we're gonna repeat the history of capital and empire, but with skeletons 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 01:06
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:there's labyrinth: the war on terror but it sucks i want an event deck full of TRUMP edit: 
Ayn Randi has issued a correction as of 04:43 on Mar 12, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 02:40
|
|
|
imagine being the guy doing the full deck writeup at the back of the rulebook that explains the historical context of all the cards
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 02:41
|
|
|
the last 15 years have seen absolutely jawdropping developments in technologies for the rich to extract wealth, have you SEEN the stock market number??
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 05:44
|
|
|
aren't us wargame simulations always fixed to ensure us victory and they just claim do-overs every time that doesnt happen as expected? like i remember the same thing happening before the iraq war(?) where on the first day the red commander of non-specific-middle-eastern-country invalidated the super technological surveillance tools by using motorcycle couriers and lights and flare signalling then scouted the blue fleet with fishing boats and sank the lot of them with an all-in alpha strike prompting the blue command to decide they were going to un-sink all those ships and change the rules so they just weren't allowed to do things in their war game simulation that would cause the us to not win, lol
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 06:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 13:20 |
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Biotech advancement coming up with some new types of bioweapons will still be just as problematic after their advancements as they were before. Like, how do you stop bioweapons from becoming an uncontrollable epidemic, and how do you prevent the political backlash by using bioweapons from doing more harm than the use of the weapons? What's to stop a biowar from going nuclear? There's a lot of supposition that these advancements will be paradigm-changing revolutions in doctrine, but it's just as likely that those advancements won't mean anything because you won't even be able to use them. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2019 12:33
|
|