Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Bar Ran Dun posted:

yes

but that isn’t the US “stealing”. and lol all y’all pro Assad?
Have you seen the other guys?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1577426769396858886

lol

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



so russia kills china, russia, kills the usa, russia becomes one-world mafioso "government" as we enter the space community. russia eventually runs out of leadership and the proletariat finally regain control over the earth

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Bar Ran Dun posted:

it is almost a certainty to me that the US pairs with Japan and Korea at some point for Navy shipyards.
Doesn't that leave them awfully vulnerable, being located in such close proximity to your peer competitor, in case of a war though? Can they really count on Japan and Korea to remain in the U.S. sphere of influence?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Bar Ran Dun posted:

my assumption is that nearly all (most everything but autarky) production dependent on marine trade ends if the US and China are at war.
Why? The demand for goods will still be there and the prices will go probably go up.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



you seem to have forgotten someone...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgrhTE7Tw0w

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Who keeps yelling carnation revolution?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Yeah, they should be called something cooler like Kinetic Marines, Nautical Operators, or Surface Warfighters.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf41KA-5U9w

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



war thunder can start selling tank hats now

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



From the pictures thread
I want to thank the American car, food, and entertainment industries; the education sector and many others for their work to reduce the offensive capabilities of the American populace.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Are longer cords too expensive for the DoD?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXhElUBOzBw

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



The Swedish Wikipedia article is more extensive than the English one if you use Google translate.

There's a German documentary "Deception: The Reagan Method – Cold War in the Great North" (Täuschung – Die Methode Reagan). It's available on YouTube.

There's also two documentary episodes from 2007 and 2008 by the TV programme Mission Review (Uppdrag Granskning).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gyi8WTHXAM

The book "In dark waters: how the Swedish people were deceived on the submarine issue" (I mörka vatten: hur svenska folket fördes bakom ljuset i ubåtsfrågan) (2009) by former diplomat Mathias Mossberg who was part of the 2001 inquiry.

There's also a couple of articles written about it by scholars in Swedish.

Under the Surface: An Examination of What the Press Wrote During the Alleged Submarine Violations in the 1980s
(Pressat läge: En pressundersökning av de påstådda kränkningarna under ubåtskrisen på 1980-talet)
By Sarah Österberg (2012)

quote:

Abstract [en]

The aim of this essay is, by using tree conductive Swedish newspapers, see how the submarine violations that Sweden suffered during 1980s, was depicted in the Swedish press in terms of threats. Two major submarine violations will be investigated in this paper, U137-incident in Karlskrona archipelago in 1981 and Hårsfjärden-incident in Stockholm archipelago in 1982. To achieve the purpose, I use a qualitative method and a threat perspective to answer my questions. These questions are for instance

- From which nation, according to press reports, comes the threat?

- What is, according to the press, threatened?

The results show that the press saw the submarine violations as a major and serious threat that mainly come from Soviet Union. The relationship between Sweden and Soviet became strained because of the submarine violations. The submarine threat for example the population, neutrality and military areas. Another result that can be seen is that readers of different newspapers have different perceptions of threat because the newspaper in many cases put their own interpretation of the threat. A clear example can be seen in that the reader´s perception will change, depending on how much criticism the press gives to the government and military.

There's also three public inquiries about it by the Swedish government

”Att möta ubåtshotet” Ubåtsskyddskommissionen 1983, SOU 1983:13

”Ubåtsfrågan 1981–1994” Ubåtsskyddskommissionen 1995, SOU 1995:135

”Perspektiv på ubåtsfrågan” SOU 2001:85-6

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 19:32 on Nov 16, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw_HDR-4fwk

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=?nqdaqXb_0bY

President Putin:
"First, in regards to China, we are ready to cooperate with China in any spheres. We have no limitations including military technologies. As we think about the future, the future world order, about ensuring our security, we're letting go of the traditional 'buy and sell' relations. We're thinking about the future, thinking about technology."

One weird trick to defeat the US. Mearsheimers hate this.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 15:19 on Dec 8, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Wang Yi, member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, met on Friday in Beijing with Saudi Deputy Foreign Minister Waleed Elkhereiji and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs Ali Bagheri Kani.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5snWLq8d78c

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeATuB3DVvo

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADIkjNewk10

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF-aTkG9rGc

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPMe_9XyMlo

Russia's first giant #panda cub born at Moscow Zoo in August 2023 was named Katyusha this Wednesday, which was selected among the votes in a name contest which attracted over 380,000 participants.
The cub is now four months old, has a lot of teeth and walks very well. She recently had a routine check-up and weighed 8.67 kilograms and was 79.5 centimeters long including the tail, according to Moscow Zoo.
Being taken good care of by "Panda Mama" at Moscow Zoo, Katyusha and her parents Ru Yi and Ding Ding live a happy life in Russia.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Will people care. How many people in the U.S. are aware that there are still U.S. troops in Syria and Iraq.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



The Oldest Man posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMwWQktNlPk

good news grumman figured out how to disarm the navy of its remaining deck guns
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_s7ivh0EEJM1z0lvw3.mp4

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



BillsPhoenix posted:

Rome basically always comes up when talking about the demise of America, but there's tens of thousands of cultures and countries that no longer exist.

And, this is a really hot take, what if Marx is wrong about the inevitable collapse of capitalism.

As an example- bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one of the most clever safeguards added to capitalism. It largely prevents work stoppage while analysts and lawyers argue about number. It also importantly allows numbers to go down, while letting the elite reallocate/fight for control among themselves, reseting number to go back up again.

I have only see Marx write about bankruptcy as an inevitable death/failure, not a reset or transition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e8rt8RGjCM&t=363s

They mention consolidation and bankruptcies at 7:47.

"The crisis causes businesses to go bust. There's also consolidation within industry where firms combine together. Sometimes in some process industries there's mothballing of plants. What that does is it takes C, Constant Capital out of the system. As business go bust the reserve army of unemployed, as Marx called it, increases. That places downward pressure on wages because people are competing for jobs. They'll take a job at a lower pay, etc. What that does is it reduces V, variable capital (wages). The overall equation gets restored. The rate of profit recovers and then we're back on another cycle of accumulation.".

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asuuyUSyomo

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



The National Immigration Administration recently introduced a new version of the Foreign Permanent Resident ID Card.

The new version of the ID card can be used to
  • buy air and railway tickets
  • check into hotels
  • handle banking services
  • apply for communication services like mobile phone and broadband services
  • handle government services, such as, taxation, social security, property registration, and customs
  • register with and use online platforms like Alipay, WeChat, and JD.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-k4wmzWqj8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wocfy1lKy2E

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



DancingShade posted:

WW3 is already over I have video proof
Nice graphics. I didn't know a sequel was in the works 👍

sound on
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_s7y8yyOrtK1z0lvw3_720.mp4


Seems like U.S. diplomacy hasn't worked in the pacific.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUEd4NFxl04
Nauru FM urges other Pacific countries to embrace one-China principle for common good

Lionel Aingimea, Nauru's Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade posted:

One of the discussions I had with the foreign minister, of China's great assistance to the PIFs (Pacific Islands Forum). I think it will be strengthened much, much more with Nauru now being part of that of the one-China principal group. I think the other countries who have not yet recognized the one-China principle should also, that other Pacific countries, should also change allegiances and recognize the one-China policy because it will be for their advantage, and then you will have a whole PIFs united under the one-China principle.

Change for the better, change for the good, change for your development, change for economic future, change for the initiatives that China has instituted and initialize in other countries around the world. And one thing I have found with China is that they see you as an equal partner. They don't see you as a junior; they don't see you as a senior; they you as an equal partner. I've seen my treatment. I'm a foreign minister, but they treated exactly every single foreign minister from whether you're a big country, whether you're a small country, equally the same, absolutely no disparity. And that amazed me. But I guess that comes from a history of diplomacy that the Chinese people have got.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax0dsfQt_sw

Lionel Aingimea, Nauru's Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade posted:

One of the great things that China has is that it sees development partners as equal partners. China looks forward to assisting them with, so in these areas, we're looking at areas of fisheries. We are a small nation, land wise, but we are a big ocean nation with a very big EEZ (exclusive economic zone) that rivals the EEZs of other countries. And therefore, that's one area. One area of practical development also is a phosphate industry. [Cooperating with] China, especially with its global initiatives, we look forward to those practical benefits that will actually start happening on the island.

It will be my advice when I go back home to our President and to cabinet caucus. What negative thing can you say about the BRI? Nothing. It's absolutely a positive initiative. When we debated this issue of the One-China principle in parliament, I used the BRI as an example. I basically said, well, let's take this initiative that was launched ten years ago in China, the Belt and Road Initiative. And I gave this basically because it's historic, it comes from the silk road. I've always been an admirer of history and a student of history. And seeing what the silk road did to all the economies, all the countries along the road, and those were basically the cities.

Of course, the solar panels have a major economic impact. It will affect the prices of electricity and utilities back in Nauru. They will of course drop by the implementation of more solar panels and more green energy into Nauru. The ports will be a game changer. We will be equal to other countries in the pacific who have ports. Ships can easily come in, fishing vessels can come in like other countries have established canneries and and fish loining plants within that port area. We can do the same thing. Our fisheries people will be coming here shortly, and they are looking forward to establishing a fishing industry as soon as the port's done.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 03:46 on Jan 28, 2024

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUrfTtSwzFM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpJFJooRj3w

🫡

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtCdXlJYKgQ

Are the USAF able to maintain culinary operational readiness? Do they still have the capability to keep their personnel fed during various scenarios?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9gxsCmr24k

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Livo posted:

With the trial, they actually had to do their job & somewhat monitor new recruit exercise technique: they also had to give very simple safety instructions, like "Don't arch & use your back to lift, use your legs like this, this is a squatting exercise, not a back one". He had an actual conversation with one PTI who asked repeatedly "Why can't we just yell at them to do situps faster like we always do? Why are you making life so hard for us?" Again, they only had to follow the clinical study exercises for a few weeks, the other few weeks were the usual ADF stuff. Apparently asking PTIs to do the bare minimum of what they're being paid to do, is very, very hard :allears:
In retrospect R. Lee Ermey (the guy who advised on and played the drill sergeant in Full Metal Jacket) is an anti-imperialist hero.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



As the first United States Larp Force (USLF) Larp Command Headquarters, LCHQ must generate, present, and sustain CON-ready intelligence, cyber, snack, and shower support forces.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4vf1wV6oMc

quote:

New Cooking Vehicle + Drone Delivery! Is this still the cooking class I know? 20240221 | Military Fans World

Description: at an altitude of more than 4,000 meters on the plateau, Tibet Military Region integrated security exercises are underway. In order to save time on the mission, the participating cooking class cooked while traveling on the plateau cooking inside the vehicle using high-performance fuel and integrated intelligent technology, greatly reducing the frying and cooking time. When the road ahead was blocked, the cooking class quickly moved out the "secret weapon", and in only 10 minutes, all 100 servings of hot food were delivered in place by the drone!

Drones seem useful in this use case.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 04:18 on Feb 28, 2024

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



DJJIB-DJDCT posted:

Please read that book about how this is all the result of Swedish social democracy being defeated and explain it to me because I have no idea why the bork borks thought this was a good idea while Switzerland and Austria had more of a connection to their national identity.
Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1980 by saying, "SUBMARINES, INVASION, SUBMARINES". By 2000, you can't say "SUBMARINES"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like ISLAMIC TERRORISM, DEMOCRACY and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about SPREADING DEMOCRACY, and all these things you're talking about are totally political things and a byproduct of them is [that] Socialist parties get hurt worse than Bourgeois parties. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the threat inflation problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to DEMOCRACY this", is much more abstract than even the ISLAMIC TERRORISM thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "SUBMARINES, INVASION". So, any way you look at it, FEAR is coming on the back-burner.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



For too long the government has been distorting and manipulating the market :argh:

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



bedpan posted:

just make everything amphibious. no bridges or ferries needed!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIj7udMoKXs&t=136s

:3:

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Poland would beat the snot out of Russia right now in a conventional war.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



some posters are simply unable to resist the siren song of the tankies

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 16:14 on Mar 12, 2024

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Soapy_Bumslap posted:

Lmao what will the end of the ukraine war do to these people's brains

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0he-LZNzVg0

They'll descend further into the fantastical Russiagate hoax and conspiracy theory. Putin's reach has no limits. He already controls the Iranians, the Hungarians, the Yemenis, the Palestinians, the Indians, the Armenians, the Saudi Arabians, the Koreans, the Syrians, the Bolivians, the Venezuelans, the Chinese, the Cubans, the Western Far Left, the Western Far Right, Polish farmers, French farmers, German farmers, the German establishment, many organized crime groups, the Republican party and Donald Trump.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_saaa3kBjfI1z0lvw3.mp4

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply