|
He has a type. its women
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 04:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
Welcome to hell holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
If you're going to do that just lol if you don't collect a captain planet style hareem.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:what? I have no idea if that stat is true, but I didn’t get it from some Reddit incel forum, it’s from one of those dating websites like OK Cupid or something like that. Maybe the reason women on ok Cupid find most of those men so repugnant is because only unattractive men use OK Cupid. Who knows.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 05:27
|
|
|
bagual posted:as a sociologist, this is a misinterpretation Maybe you’re right, but most sociologists are far-left ideologues. You can’t trust their “research”.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 05:44
|
|
|
Coolguye posted:the studies tended to acknowledge exceptions like this, hence the way i tried to grant their existence with it being 'more' of a thing without belaboring the point, but in general they didn't want the existence of a couple of tribal societies that never scaled past a couple hundred or couple thousand people to conflate with the context of the larger civilizations that would routinely cover hundreds of thousands to millions (which is what the question was basically about because that's the context 99% of the planet lives in today). i get it, it's just that biological sociology is way too often generalized into eternal facts about the human condition, if a team of researchers would travel back in time a few centuries ago when slavery was the default around the globe they might find that slaves get a bonus by having a master that provides food and shelter versus being out on the fields being spearfucked by barbarians or something, but that's describing a biological rationale for the social institution, not proving that the institution itself derives from biology and is immutable and eternal because of human nature. 99% of the world acting this way right now is in no way guarantee that things will keep being this way or that it's baked into our biology, and the exceptions, rather than proving the rule, prove there's no hard biological determination for social norms going on there. The immediate family incest taboo is a good example of hard biological determinants, societies that didn't have it literally couldn't survive for long. still, things will probably be this way for the duration of our lifetimes 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 05:51
|
|
|
Devils Affricate posted:Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk both support universal basic income they can start with me tia (thnks in advamce)
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 05:52
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Maybe you’re right, but most sociologists are far-left ideologues. You can’t trust their “research”. we should never have strayed from Comte, "social physics" sounds way more legitimate and sciencey 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 05:58
|
|
|
One wife is too many. I’d like a wife maybe 3 days a week. Partialgamy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 06:47
|
|
|
kickascii posted:DNA analysis has shown that throughout most of history, only around one in five men were fathers. Kings, chieftans and warlords were monopolizing all the puss. If this were true, that women have only gone after the top 20% of men for millenia, wouldn't that have killed off the unattractive qualities in men by now?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 07:27
|
|
|
I don’t think monogamy makes much sense in this day and age, particularly if you’re not going to produce children. Why shouldn’t people just have sex with whomever. Why is sex different from Warcraft or snooker or book clubs or fishing or historical reenactments or movie watching or going to the theater. Idk Tbf a lot of things aren’t necessarily logical in the world but we get used to them and it’s painful as a society to change our ways so it’s better just to stick to it. And that’s fine I guess.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 08:31
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:I don’t think monogamy makes much sense in this day and age, particularly if you’re not going to produce children. Why shouldn’t people just have sex with whomever. Why is sex different from Warcraft or snooker or book clubs or fishing or historical reenactments or movie watching or going to the theater. Idk Holy poo poo, this is remarkably naive. Society is very complex and defies our attempts to categorize everything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 08:40
|
|
|
I never hosed a 10, but one time I hosed five 2s.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 08:45
|
|
|
tango alpha delta posted:Holy poo poo, this is remarkably naive. Society is very complex and defies our attempts to categorize everything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 08:52
|
|
|
I like monogamy. I can't imagine trying to manage more than one person and their feelings. Also my BF's cum is precious and I would be sad if he shared it with someone else. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 09:06
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:I don’t think monogamy makes much sense in this day and age, particularly if you’re not going to produce children. Why shouldn’t people just have sex with whomever. Why is sex different from Warcraft or snooker or book clubs or fishing or historical reenactments or movie watching or going to the theater. Because even if you're actively avoiding trying to have a child it can still happen? All those stats on birth control and condoms assume proper use. If there's one thing people aren't known for it's being perfect and never making mistakes, especially when emotional and riding a hormonal roller coaster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 10:40
|
|
|
So cool that Metallica are still rockin' after all this time
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 10:45
|
|
|
Coolguye posted:dawkins and a bunch of other biologists his name is Dick Dorkins, get it right
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 10:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 12:52
|
|
|
fdjkbnadjnbkjldaf posted:If this were true, that women have only gone after the top 20% of men for millenia, wouldn't that have killed off the unattractive qualities in men by now? You assume the qualities that make men unattractive are genetic. Being poor af is inherited, usually, but it ain't biology. Also I bet that 20/80 thing has as much to do with women simply being less turned on by men in a visual sense. Like a man has to be generally exceptional to even be noted, from just a picture. Ive been told over and over that voice, movement, personality, even smell all play a bigger part in Male attractiveness for women than vice versa. Hence why women trend towards literotica over pornhub. Also, OP, poly literally almost never works for straights. Gay dudes apparently make it work just fine regularly. Never seen a straight couple where it wasn't two people suicide bombing a dying relationship, or one partner actively making the other partner miserable for their own sexual gain. (Sometimes the misery IS the gain).
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 13:21
|
|
|
I found a reverse harem-style show that was a pilot on tlc back in 2017. It looks like the poly family is/was a creation of the reality tv show circuit going back over a decade.  https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2017/02/new-poly-reality-show-pilot-for-brother.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 13:34
|
|
|
Buncha skinny dicks itt cant please two women at once
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:22
|
|
|
Lewd, man.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:31
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:I don’t think monogamy makes much sense in this day and age, particularly if you’re not going to produce children. Why shouldn’t people just have sex with whomever. Why is sex different from Warcraft or snooker or book clubs or fishing or historical reenactments or movie watching or going to the theater. Idk yes, why make a meaningful long term connection and partnership with another human being of the type that requires a lifetime of commitment and care, coming to understand each other deeply, sharing all of life’s experiences- when you can just go put your penis inside of various holes I mean there’s lots of holes just go put your junk in there
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:37
|
|
|
The Management posted:One wife is too many. I’d like a wife maybe 3 days a week. Partialgamy.  fdjkbnadjnbkjldaf posted:If this were true, that women have only gone after the top 20% of men for millenia, wouldn't that have killed off the unattractive qualities in men by now? attractiveness is relative, it's entirely possible men HAVE been getting more subjectively handsome for the last 10,000 years because of that sort of pressure, we wouldn't be able to be sure unless we got a bunch of faces from classical age mofos and could compare. it wouldn't stop there from being 'ugly' men today just because they're uglier than the next guy. that said the two things that men and women look for in a mate is apparently kindess and intelligence and this is something in common between the two sexes. that makes sense because that goes directly to how good a partner and parent they will be, whereas physical attractiveness doesn't really lend itself to either. Coolguye fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Mar 19, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:37
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:Why is sex different from Warcraft or snooker or book clubs or fishing or historical reenactments or movie watching or going to the theater. Idk incel spotted
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:39
|
|
|
naem posted:yes, why make a meaningful long term connection and partnership with another human being of the type that requires a lifetime of commitment and care, coming to understand each other deeply, sharing all of life’s experiences- when you can just go put your penis inside of various holes
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
naem posted:yes, why make a meaningful long term connection and partnership with another human being of the type that requires a lifetime of commitment and care, coming to understand each other deeply, sharing all of life’s experiences- when you can just go put your penis inside of various holes Humans have multiple holes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
A meaningful long term connection can be purchased on a monthly or appointment basis, it's a commodity like everything else!
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:00
|
|
|
Why do people want to have to fill out a bunch of forms and reify their new "identity" with labels and terms? These internet dorks are not doing anything differently from the way it was always done, they just like to be "nonmonogamous" and "asexual" and so forth. Just get to the loving and sucking. Hopefully enough of it will cure you of being an primadonna.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:01
|
|
|
CountryMatters posted:The poor are better off now than they were in the past, yes, but the scope of the wealthiest people has expanded to the point that it's hard to even quantify. Bezos is small fry compared to absolute monarchs. Some click baity article estimated Versailles is worth about 50 billion. Note that Buckingham palace (5 billion) is also only one of many british palaces. The house of Saud apparently might be worth 1400 billion. That's not counting the resource of the state at your disposal as a monarch like Louis xiv.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:09
|
|
|
If a white straight acting girl can't customize her identity in a tacky way, we are truly living the darkest timeline.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:10
|
|
|
naem posted:yes, why make a meaningful long term connection and partnership with another human being of the type that requires a lifetime of commitment and care, coming to understand each other deeply, sharing all of life’s experiences- when you can just go put your penis inside of various holes Cant speak to polygamy which seems kinda deeply problematic as it typically manifests but lol if you think this poo poo about poly people Its real easy to develop strong like intense loving bonds with multiple people but if you're conditioned to be possessive and jealous of the act of sex, you wouldn't know or believe it i guess
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
naem posted:“incels” are guys who notice that silly young people in their early 20’s who are in that brief “dating around having a good time during your college age years before you have adult responsibilities” period of life concentrate mostly on humping other attractive people, and decided the entire human race is flawed and doomed by show of hands, how many of us have been frustrated over our lack of super-model humping? notice how my hand isn't up, you pathetic virgins? also the fact that someone can not get laid in the modern day with all the make-up, plastic surgery, topical ointments for acne, therapy, dating coaches/pickup artists, hookup apps, etc. is a monumental failure of darwinism. incels are graveyard filler with extra steps. unpleasantly turgid fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Mar 19, 2019 |
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:16
|
|
|
unpleasantly turgid posted:by show of hands, how many of us have been frustrated over our lack of super-model humping? notice how my hand isn't up, you pathetic virgins? What are you doing with your hand?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:17
|
|
|
basic hitler posted:Cant speak to polygamy which seems kinda deeply problematic as it typically manifests but lol if you think this poo poo about poly people I wouldn't say that's true. Sometimes you just fall for two (or however many) people. Why does that immediately make a person abnegate jealousy? That's something that gets brought up by the poly folks often: they say that jealousy is small-minded and selfish and ignore that it's deeply rooted in the human psyche. Jealousy may not be "healthy" or "grown up" as these people would have it, but judging from the people I've met, a lot of them don't have a clear sense of their own emotions. You know, like guilt.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:18
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:Also I bet that 20/80 thing has as much to do with women simply being less turned on by men in a visual sense. Like a man has to be generally exceptional to even be noted, from just a picture. Ive been told over and over that voice, movement, personality, even smell all play a bigger part in Male attractiveness for women than vice versa. This is something Contrapoints actually discussed in her video take-down of incels. She actually stops a moment to acknowledge that dating sites, which basically only give pictures of the users are a horrible way to find a partner, especially if you are not really handsome. It's not that women are only choosing the top 20% of men all the time, but that they're doing so on dating sites and incels are overwhelmingly experiencing dating through these sites.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:23
|
|
|
Colonel Cancer posted:What are you doing with your hand? well one hand is clutching this firm rear end, who cares what the other one is doing? you can't do anything sinister with just one hand.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
phasmid posted:I wouldn't say that's true. Sometimes you just fall for two (or however many) people. Why does that immediately make a person abnegate jealousy? That's something that gets brought up by the poly folks often: they say that jealousy is small-minded and selfish and ignore that it's deeply rooted in the human psyche. I definitely experience and express jealousy and feeling it isnt the small minded thing but letting it dominate your decision-making is
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
Colonel Cancer posted:A meaningful long term connection can be purchased on a monthly or appointment basis, it's a commodity like everything else! I forgot my login to my wife subscription so I canceled my credit card and let the subscription lease lapse and now I dont have a wife.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 18:43
|
|