|
Dead Reckoning posted:No, I'm serious, what part of what I posted did you think was "bad faith" and how do you define that? Maybe it's one of those things that's hard to define? Bad faith example: pretending to not understand the benefits of the use of computers in an office work environment in TYOL 2019. Unoriginal Name posted:Ban certain posters, by name, from posting about about their lovely pet topic. Seemed to work with Lejackal for a long time Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 13:12 on Apr 26, 2019 |
#
¿
Apr 26, 2019 13:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jun 1, 2024 03:25 |
|
|
Whatever lofty ideas and ideals Republicans think they hold in the end they create nothing but pain and death. I mean, but should we ban them?  WampaLord posted:just concern about you It's the defining feature of all of them. More IK's. 6 hour probes are good but best applied while the poster is still posting. Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 03:28 on Apr 30, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2019 03:24
|
|
|
wateroverfire posted:I think you're way too far up your own ideology. The former is just an opinion on the effect of the tone of BLM. If you have another opinion that's fine - people should be able to talk about that! "It's dogwhistle racism!" is the kind of thing people use to shut down debate in the debate forum. What's purpose does it serve to seek to "debate" the appropriate tone for BLM to use? It strikes me as analogous to the media seeking to gin up stories during the primaries about who voters like and don't like instead of stories on the candidates policies and positions. Are we debating whether BLM is correct or are we debating whether they will be ultimately successful? these are two very different conversations and I don't think they both necessarily fit here. Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 17:51 on Apr 30, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2019 17:49
|
|
|
Freakazoid_ posted:I'm not in favor of new mods anymore. I am in favor of more idiot kings. No more kings! We need Democracy in posting
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2019 01:01
|
|
|
AGGGGH BEES posted:Since apparently it's an unwritten rule anyways mabye you should actually add that saying "I'm voting for Trump" is bannable What is there to debate and discuss about "i'm voting for trump in 2020"?
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2019 20:21
|
|
|
"But I don't FEEL like a sexist racist" If people are dumb enough to not connect the policies they are supporting to the clear and obvious results of those policies maybe they are too dumb to engage in debates and discussions anyway? Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 17:30 on May 3, 2019 |
|
#
¿
May 3, 2019 17:27
|
|
|
It's weird hearing alleged conservatives argue for the Government's right to look up their skirt, but only if it's to make sure they aren't gay. "Why won't they just give me clear rules so I can find and abuse the loopholes." 
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2019 19:21
|
|
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:It was! But also, and I mean this genuinely, I'm glad you finally get what we meant with the example, that there are some ideas that don't need to be debated A problem is that there are so many lovely repeated arguments. We have debated many of these topics to death. Kialo seeks to solve it in how they organize the conversations. Here, we get the same dumbasses posting the same dumbass things year after year.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2019 19:35
|
|
|
I think they buy them for themselves. It's a false flag op.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2019 00:53
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Regardless, the person who just said "Literally every right winger I've ever seen in D&D has the same playbook" and thinks that pro-life posters should be banned has been rewarded with oversight of uspol. Like, come on.You're not even pretending anymore. You could start a different thread about your favorite conservative issue.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:And a few pages ago you said those positions were inherently sexist or racist and posters making them should be banned. "Sorry if this offends". If only there was any other threads in this subforum.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
Your argument that you can't post in one thread due to the scary IK?
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2019 21:09
|
|
|
KingNastidon posted:Hint hint: "good" is a subjective valuation. The republican tax reform was "good" for nearly everyone in that it increased post-tax income and deficits largely aren't a concern of the left. The Republican tendancy to play bad faith games with deficits is a concern of the left and your entirely full of garbage and the same bad faith . No wonder you are scared to 
Harold Fjord fucked around with this message at 23:59 on May 6, 2019 |
|
#
¿
May 6, 2019 23:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jun 1, 2024 03:25 |
|
|
Let's put his concerns to the test and make FoS IK of this thread.
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2019 17:28
|
|