|
Bundy posted:There is absolutely no way Pogba transfers directly to Liverpool for any kind of fee that we'd expect for him even if Klopp wanted him. There'd be uproar on both sides and Pogba's reception at Anfield would be hilarious. obviously it would be unlikely but hypothetically I’m sure they’d pay that much for him
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 13:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
RideTheSpiral posted:chelsea after sarri, barca needs a reboot, bayern are spending big, liverpool would probably love to have him There's no way United sell a player directly to Liverpool and I don't see current Chelsea spending £100m+ on a player. edit: Aren't PSG scraping by with FFP at the minute anyway? I thought that's why they took Mbappe on loan for a season first. Unless they sell Neymar for a profit, of course.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 13:11
|
|
|
I don’t see anyone but PSG and maybe Madrid paying that kind of money for Pogba, and Madrid seems unlikely.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 13:20
|
|
|
blue footed boobie posted:I don’t see anyone but PSG and maybe Madrid paying that kind of money for Pogba, and Madrid seems unlikely. Didn't Raiola and Zidane make eyes at each other in the press recently? I don't know how much Real Madrid can afford to buy for Zidane given the stadium plans but I can certainly see Woodward falling for some sort of deal involving cash plus Bale.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 13:56
|
|
|
Mickolution posted:There's no way United sell a player directly to Liverpool and I don't see current Chelsea spending £100m+ on a player. Madrid are absolutely going to spend stupid money on Neymar instead of Mbappe
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 14:01
|
|
|
Jose posted:Madrid are absolutely going to spend stupid money on Neymar instead of Mbappe Of course they are. I wouldn't worry about stadium expenses derailing any Madrid spending, because I'm sure the Spanish government will take care of it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 14:05
|
|
|
Jason Sextro posted:Of course they are. I wouldn't worry about stadium expenses derailing any Madrid spending, because I'm sure the Spanish government will take care of it. It's like Franco never died!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 14:09
|
|
|
Mickolution posted:There's no way United sell a player directly to Liverpool and I don't see current Chelsea spending £100m+ on a player. Wasn't it Gabriel Heinze that ManU absolutely refused to sell to Liverpool a while back ago?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 14:36
|
|
|
Shroud posted:Wasn't it Gabriel Heinze that ManU absolutely refused to sell to Liverpool a while back ago? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 14:39
|
|
|
 United Tory scum confirmed
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 15:28
|
|
|
Shroud posted:Wasn't it Gabriel Heinze that ManU absolutely refused to sell to Liverpool a while back ago? Yeah, if I remember right there was some backdoor plan to sell him to a club in Europe who we would just buy him off straight away.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 15:32
|
|
|
Loving Africa Chaps posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 15:59
|
|
|
Confirmed the Pool is the biggest antisemite club even more than the Chels
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 16:14
|
|
|
Loving Africa Chaps posted:
How many Liverpool supporting MPs are Blairites versus Corbyn-lovers?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 16:23
|
|
|
i have to assume that SNP chelsea fan hasn't actually been to stamford bridge and seen all the red hand no surrender union jacks
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 23:20
|
|
|
I'm still doing all the lols about the idea of Barcelona buying a black player
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 14:11
|
|
|
Byolante posted:I'm still doing all the lols about the idea of Barcelona buying a black player i don't know if this idea is more or less funny than the one of them actively seeking out and signing kevin prince boateng
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 17:35
|
|
|
FullLeatherJacket posted:i don't know if this idea is more or less funny than the one of them actively seeking out and signing kevin prince boateng Or spending $100m on Ousmane Dembele.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 19:49
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/sportingintel/status/1115016550535311360 https://twitter.com/sportingintel/status/1115161545963638784
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 16:19
|
|
|
Rip Florian Lejeune you’ve been real good but now you’ve died twice
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 18:07
|
|
|
Jose posted:https://twitter.com/sportingintel/status/1115016550535311360 I'm honestly quite torn between agreeing that this is a problem that should be fixed and pointing out that the three clubs that didn't meet the quota are Bournemouth, Huddersfield and Southampton and that all the people who wanted to watch those games that weren't already going to them could fill a decent sized minibus At some point, though, I don't think it's the worst thing in the world that teams that do well get more money than teams that don't. You don't want to turn it into one of those leagues where the sole negotiating aim of the smaller clubs is to get to play eight games each against Rangers and Celtic each season, it has to be proportional and balanced, but historically giving lots of tv money to crap teams has generally just meant wage inflation for crap players and then clubs being unable to meet their liabilities once they get relegated
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:05
|
|
|
I dunno. Steepening the top 6 - safe pl - relegation battlers - top of champo - rest of champo slope doesn't seem like it'll do anyone any favours.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:12
|
|
|
tarbrush posted:I dunno. Steepening the top 6 - safe pl - relegation battlers - top of champo - rest of champo slope doesn't seem like it'll do anyone any favours. Are there any safe sides outside the top 6 any more? Leicester, Everton and Wolves maybe if you count sides that were promoted this season.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
Strawman posted:Are there any safe sides outside the top 6 any more? Leicester, Everton and Wolves maybe if you count sides that were promoted this season. West ham and Watford.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
tarbrush posted:I dunno. Steepening the top 6 - safe pl - relegation battlers - top of champo - rest of champo slope doesn't seem like it'll do anyone any favours. I'm not particularly saying that it should be steepened from where it already is, just that the biggest issues in football right now aren't that the smaller clubs can't afford to field competitive teams and need to be artificially propped up to do so
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:46
|
|
|
Seems fair if you're a poo poo team playing poo poo football that no-one wants to watch outside of your fanbase you should get on tv less.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 21:04
|
|
|
I'd be interested to see the vote split when the TV money change was voted through. The Big Six can't sway the vote themselves, which means at least 4 of the other sides (and I'd guarantee Everton are one of them) voted for it as well with the hope that they'd benefit down the line.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
Bacon Terrorist posted:Seems fair if you're a poo poo team playing poo poo football that no-one wants to watch outside of your fanbase you should get on tv less. Maybe they'd be less poo poo and the league would be more even and watchable if they got more money
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 21:57
|
|
|
Bacon Terrorist posted:Seems fair if you're a poo poo team playing poo poo football that no-one wants to watch outside of your fanbase you should get on tv less. You might want to think this through again
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 22:00
|
|
|
Bacon Terrorist posted:Seems fair if you're a poo poo team playing poo poo football that no-one wants to watch outside of your fanbase you should get on tv less. isn't one of the issues with the imbalance in la liga that the league has individual tv deals so real and barca get most of the tv money?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 22:15
|
|
|
Give every team in the top two divisions the same money regardless of position and let Sky put Liverpool and Leeds on as much as they want.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 23:35
|
|
|
All Billionaires should get equal TV time regardless of whether they own a football club or not imho
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
Bundy posted:Saner fans would choose for Pogba to go at this point I think, if it's a choice between him getting a massive new contract or flogging him for a lump sum. The larger concern remains recruitment rather than sales whatever happens with Pogba. No one will give a poo poo if we recruit well this summer (there's stuff coming out that both Phelan and OGS have concerns about the current setup, surprise surprise, so I expect to see something change there, DoF or no DoF) and pack Pogba off somewhere with the air of "SAF was right". id love to see a swap with the other pogba at tours 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 01:24
|
|
|
Breath Ray posted:id love to see a swap with the other pogba at tours Pogba twins in a straight swap for Paul to Atlanta United?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 03:25
|
|
|
Early reports are that Kane is out for the season.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 00:48
|
|
|
Shrapnig posted:Early reports are that Kane is out for the season. That loving sucks for Spurs, but at least Son can still do a job
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 00:54
|
|
|
Harry Kane’s ankles are just the regen of Dean Ashton
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 01:02
|
|
|
Spurs apparently do better when Son is fit without Kane anyway so...
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 01:15
|
|
|
*a smiling Bill Nicholson* Go on my Son
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 01:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
Bundy posted:Spurs apparently do better when Son is fit without Kane anyway so...
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 15:58
|
|
