|
OP its a condition that when ur pancreas cant make insulin and now people are trying to gouge insulin prices by 300% or whatever anyways vote bernie so you can get healthcare and cheaper insulin so that u arent dialetic or whatever ok thank u bye
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 18:50 |
|
|
ö <- a dialectic
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2019 00:00
|
|
|
dialectrics are basically insulators, it has to do with material properties which is why leftist talk about material conditions so much i might be profoundly mistaken tho.... I think insulators have something to do with diabetes too?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2019 00:02
|
|
|
The dialectic is when your body can't process sugar correctly
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2019 00:05
|
|
|
E: that's what I get for leaving the response window open and then post without refreshing
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2019 00:05
|
|
|
im embedding dialectics under the skin between my fingers
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2019 03:19
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2019 04:36
|
|
|
Former DILF posted:how about a dialickdick and its when two people suck you off
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2019 09:58
|
|
|
dinceletic
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2019 17:19
|
|
|
It's when I tell people to shut the gently caress up until they do, exclusively online
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2019 18:10
|
|
|
in the manner of people who speak with a regional accent
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2019 18:56
|
|
|
Turning up the dialectics to 11
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2019 19:30
|
|
|
thesis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oD0W6SSBUA antithesis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOfkwm_Yz0Q synthesis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jqOSDq0Ssc
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 14:13
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRfgKrmI9Po
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 14:16
|
|
|
Dead Beef posted:dialectrics are basically insulators, it has to do with material properties which is why leftist talk about material conditions so much As the electric field induces response in a material it forces a separation, a polarization of charges. But so to does this separation of charge generate its own field keeping them locked in a cyclic influence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 18:19
|
|
|
Dialectical truth is created between opposites. Gene Ray wrote about this a lot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 19:33
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7wstDNtlmE
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5JXrP8yv8o&t=42s
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 20:20
|
|
|
Dialectical materialism leads to an interpretation of history known as historical materialism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojR86ivIhQ8
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
Every time I click into this thread I leave feeling simultaneously a little smarter and a whole lot dumber.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 23:30
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:Every time I click into this thread I leave feeling simultaneously a little smarter and a whole lot dumber. https://twitter.com/unhaunting/status/469544578597789697?lang=en
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2019 23:31
|
|
|
R. Guyovich posted:more accurate to have no end and an endless chain of thesis-antithesis-synthesis. teleology is so 18th century Teleology is another one of those wtf terms for me, I think it’s the idea that there’s some grand plan or defined end state of history? And the Marxist would say nah that poo poo doesn’t exist? I feel like makes it sound like nihilism though, which isn’t how I understand the term.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:Teleology is another one of those wtf terms for me, I think it’s the idea that there’s some grand plan or defined end state of history? And the Marxist would say nah that poo poo doesn’t exist? I feel like makes it sound like nihilism though, which isn’t how I understand the term. telelology is the use of modern communication networks to lol at maoists
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 00:42
|
|
|
lol is he actually following brian meyers' analysis? what a lib
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
apoplectic for the dialectic
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 03:44
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:Teleology is another one of those wtf terms for me, I think it’s the idea that there’s some grand plan or defined end state of history? And the Marxist would say nah that poo poo doesn’t exist? I feel like makes it sound like nihilism though, which isn’t how I understand the term. liberals believe in an end to social progress, so yeah. maybe a Marxist could claim that direct anarchistic democracy in a post-scarcity situation could be the 'end', but you'd probably look like a liberal to everyone. i dont think its wrong to say that we cant imagine the future past one or two steps, and while it might end, it hasn't yet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 07:03
|
|
|
Captain Billy Pissboy posted:Thesis: I want to bang my maid i want to bang this post been laughing about it since yesterday
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 22:29
|
|
|
Actual question: Thesis: Marx's theories are based upon a certain interpretation of the progression of history, and this information was used by him to extrapolate information about the progression of humanity in the present and the future. Anti-thesis: Our knowledge of the past is inherently incomplete and subjective. Each time period has its own limited understanding of the past. Does Marx's limited understanding of the past render his theories invalid? If not, why not? If they are still valid, what makes them valid, if it's not an accurate interpretation of the past?
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 22:56
|
|
|
Synthesis: have you got a better idea
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
twoday posted:Actual question: the trivial cop-out answer is that marxist thought is an ongoing process that explicitly responds to changes in material conditions. that includes responding to an evolving understanding of history. marx was responding to and critiquing capitalism in his time as he understood it, and marxists today do the same in our time. the connection is the tools that we use (historical materialism, dialectics) and the point of view we bring with us (class, workers as producers of value and capitalists as appropriators of value). but i feel like you're coming at marx from a rationalist/empiricist standpoint if you're thinking about it in terms of "incorrect information yields incorrect theories". i suppose what you're really getting at is "how do we know marx was right?" from my standpoint, that's a simpler, but equally fraught way to think about it (whats it mean to be "right" in this context?) im gonna have to let someone who actually did the assigned reading unpack this for you
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 00:09
|
|
|
psychohistory is science fiction, op
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 00:40
|
|
|
Helianthus Annuus posted:the trivial cop-out answer is that marxist thought is an ongoing process that explicitly responds to changes in material conditions. that includes responding to an evolving understanding of history. Yes, the first two paragraphs of your post were the conclusions I came to myself. As for how I’m approaching it, I’m not sure, I was just thinking about the subjective nature of history and then thought of this. I don’t want to know if Marx was right because I’m not sure if it’s possible for someone to be right about something (because, once again, subjectivity). So then the question becomes how to reinterpret his ideas in light of new historical information, and indeed the answer I came to was to go beyond his own personal theories and look towards the process of dialectical materialism (and other analytical tools) that came about after Marx.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 01:37
|
|
|
Twitter is great because the summation of every conflict between thesis and anthesis is being a terminally online dipshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 03:19
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:Teleology is another one of those wtf terms for me, I think it’s the idea that there’s some grand plan or defined end state of history? And the Marxist would say nah that poo poo doesn’t exist? I feel like makes it sound like nihilism though, which isn’t how I understand the term. marxists don't believe in a kind of millenarian stageist process where things resolve themselves, nor do we think history is this forward progression where there's an end in sight and the slow march gets us where we want to be eventually. you have to a) be involved in history, actively working to shape it in the direction you want, and b) history is just as capable of regressing as it is progressing, which means you're doing the world a disservice if you don't follow a).
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 08:29
|
|
|
twoday posted:Yes, the first two paragraphs of your post were the conclusions I came to myself. have you read socialism: utopian and scientific?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 08:33
|
|
|
Thanks for the tip, read the first third and will read the rest in the coming days. I already have some thoughts but I'll finish it first
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2019 20:49
|
|
|
twoday posted:Yes, the first two paragraphs of your post were the conclusions I came to myself. marxism is strong because it doesn't require a rationalist or empiricist epistemology those epistemologies goof up right out the gate by presuming that knowledge can be independent from the knower -- that theres some independent Standard of Truth that exists outside the material world and outside of history by deploying the idea of dialectics, we know better to try separating knowledge from the knower. both are to be conceived as part of a holistic system -- the world, materiality the lesson to learn here is that your initial assumptions matter a lot. for example, if you assume there's such a thing as "class", and you acknowledge and affirm the limitless interconnectivity between "class" and "everything else", then you can comment intelligently on our present circumstances under capitalism. on the other hand, if you assume that a theory can be proven valid (that there IS a correct theory, and marxism is either it or its not), then you're getting away from dialectics and towards rationalism and/or empiricism. the problem is that you wind up asking questions that cannot be answered a better question to ask of a theory is whether it "works", whether it's useful. whether it's fruitful or whether it closes up on itself anyway sorry for the epistemological call out. god bless you for doing the reading
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2019 06:18
|
|
|
oops i dropped my MONSTER SYNTHESIS i use for my MAGNUM DIALECTIC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us5MGEL5W34
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2019 06:23
|
|
|
how about instead of epistemology its "piss tape-ology" and its the study of how to know that the piss tape is real
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2019 06:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 18:50 |
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:thesis this owns
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2019 07:02
|
|
