|
Gosh darn it you posted all the corrections stuff I was gonna post vvvvv: they're ok but not my strongest work Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 03:05 on May 2, 2019 |
#
¿
May 1, 2019 17:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 08:38 |
|
|
I'm really sorry, y'all, I could've sworn he released a revised version with an amended foreword and the offending material stripped out. When I dig up my copy I'll try to flag all the offending studies.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2019 07:21
|
|
|
I should note that PNAS has a bit of a reputation as a dumping ground for academy researchers when they run studies that don’t turn out well; “P-values Not Accepted Somewhere”. It’s not uniformly garbage or anything, but should be read with caution, like most non-discipline outlets. Edit: this reputation was due to pnas’s parallel submission pipeline for nas members (which google tells me was partly reformed in 2017), but, again as a non-field-specific, big name journal , it has problems with really inconsistent review standards and headline chasing. Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 20:03 on May 10, 2019 |
|
#
¿
May 10, 2019 19:27
|
|