|
|
# ? Mar 13, 2021 22:10 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:48 |
|
|
# ? Mar 13, 2021 23:24 |
|
Very nice. Not yet a fence.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2021 01:16 |
|
Sleepytime posted:Very nice. I prefer the ones you posted in the landscape thread but the top one is great as it is here too. Of the two in that thread I preferred the bottom one but the bottom one in this thread just doesn't do it for me. It doesn't have the same strength of composition as if the objects were placed with a balanced photograph in mind Twenties Superstar fucked around with this message at 08:25 on Mar 15, 2021 |
# ? Mar 15, 2021 07:52 |
|
Twenties Superstar posted:I prefer the ones you posted in the landscape thread but the top one is great as it is here too. Thanks, I can see that. On the second one here I liked that it was easier to see the roll of fence. Maybe I should have tried given it more weight if not going the route I went in the landscape thread.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2021 17:52 |
|
Fencing by B. B., on Flickr Fence Too by B. B., on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 16:52 |
|
gently caress yeah dawn purple snow. That poo poo is glorious to be out in.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 17:33 |
|
xzzy posted:gently caress yeah dawn purple snow. That poo poo is glorious to be out in. Fog was so heavy I got great light for a couple of hours.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 17:44 |
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 16:32 |
|
|
# ? Apr 10, 2021 06:45 |
|
It’s spring time at the fence.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2021 16:56 |
|
This picture speaks to me
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 20:44 |
|
|
# ? May 1, 2021 08:01 |
|
|
# ? May 6, 2021 06:58 |
|
|
# ? May 6, 2021 10:22 |
|
tk posted:It’s spring time at the fence. Oh, no!
|
# ? May 8, 2021 21:46 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2021 05:23 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2021 03:18 |
|
tk posted:Oh, no! Well, you finished the seasons, so maybe you'll get a new fence now!
|
# ? May 18, 2021 03:54 |
|
Kodak 120
|
# ? May 18, 2021 20:47 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2021 04:15 |
|
please reconsider what you're doing to those poor images
|
# ? May 19, 2021 15:28 |
|
Who?
|
# ? May 19, 2021 15:46 |
|
I'm pretty sure you. Those are terrible.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:11 |
|
Oh, cool critique, that's very hurtful.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:17 |
|
i'm not saying don't post but that processing is extremely overwrought and the sort of thing that this forum mocked for a decade. there's an entire thread dedicated to poking fun at images with that treatment. the 2nd especially, it's just been cooked so much
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:18 |
|
You all mock other artists in here?
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:26 |
|
those images are way overdone in terms of processing, just ugly. i'm seeing some photoshopped flare too which is just
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:42 |
|
Pleiadian Light posted:You all mock other artists in here? It's the goon way, it makes us stronger.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:47 |
|
Pleiadian Light posted:You all mock other artists in here? https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3684472
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:48 |
|
Full disclosure on a few things here, folks. I do actually know my way around a camera and editing. The gate pic was an experiment of sorts showing the extremes in Luminar AI if you throw every option and slider at a photo. Yes, it was intentionally overcooked. The sky isn't even real, that can now be faked in, the flare is fake, haze was added, etc. It was a throwaway photo from a year ago that wasn't in focus and as a case study in being able to turn a crap shot into a salvageable shot I started messing with it. Once I learned that you can literally paint a new scene in Luminar I went nuts trying to make a photo that actually looked painted. I wanted to see what I could pull out of a photo that I normally would delete. So yes, overcooked but for a purpose. The Kodak 120 was shot on a $15 plastic holga in a series where I was learning not only to shoot film for the first time, but on a janky throwaway camera that falls apart when you try to load film. You all didn't know that background, but I'm saddened that as artists we are tearing others down instead of building them up.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:49 |
|
i'm going to be a better poster than i used to be and just not respond to that. good luck with your experimentation, i hope you can make something good of it
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:51 |
|
Pleiadian Light posted:we are tearing others down you think calling your photos terrible is tearing you down?
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:52 |
|
If you want a hugbox to farm congratulations for your art, make a facebook group. In these parts you get torn down so you can build back up the right way.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:54 |
|
bobmarleysghost posted:you think calling your photos terrible is tearing you down? Me specifically? No.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:56 |
|
xzzy posted:If you want a hugbox to farm congratulations for your art, make a facebook group. I think I'm pretty hip to that criterion.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:57 |
|
so then what are you on about? we don't need to know any background on how those images were made to know they're terrible. experiment, sure, but don't be a crybaby crying about people tearing you down because they call your terrible photos terrible. learn to take criticism. the criticism for these pics? way overcooked, never do that again.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 16:58 |
|
Also sky replacement is the HDR of the 2020's, let us never speak of it again.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 17:03 |
|
Part of my art, off this board, is people's reaction to art and the psychology behind it. So it's interesting to me to see fellow artists telling someone to not do art a certain way, to stop making art, or just generally calling them terrible. It doesn't lend to growing a community of like-minded individuals. Creative criticism and being kind to others is different, as seen in the approach of bellows, and my hat is off to you, goon.
|
# ? May 19, 2021 17:03 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:48 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2021 17:05 |