|
pointsofdata posted:(as though you couldn't work out who spent 8 hours at a school and then 3 at a strip club was if you really wanted to) Look, she’s working her way though Medical School, ok? 
|
#
¿
May 31, 2019 14:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 11:13 |
|
|
eschaton posted:if I were asked to make an “object recognizer,” I wouldn’t train one huge network on a million images of the object I want to recognize and allow steganography to break everything, I’d train a large number of smaller networks on different characteristics to recognize, and use additional separate networks to determine confidence according to recognitions, etc. finally arriving at the one confidence value “What if the three blind men and the elephant only it were a good thing?”
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2019 13:56
|
|
|
rotor posted:For real though anyone doing research in ML or machine vision should stop. The downsides of these technologies significantly outweigh the benefits.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2019 01:42
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:the other day I was doing recatchpas for google and giving wrong answers as a form of protest against soulless automation Wish the rest of us could be protected from your unusual network traffic too, OP.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2019 16:44
|
|
|
The thing that grinds my gears is how they don't specify what percentage of a square needs to have a traffic light in it before I make a click/no-click decision on teh box. I mean, is "Click all boxes where >=25/33/50/67/75% of the box's area is filled by a traffic light (or sub-assembly thereof)" really so loving hard? E: Also poor documentation on whether or not pedestrian crossing lights (not signs) attached to traffic lights are to be considered as traffic lights for the purposes of the above.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
fritz posted:ontology catapults physiology
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2019 22:30
|
|
|
animist posted:use this as an excuse to build more public transit pls See, at this point the people forced to take public transit really will be the inferiors of everyone else, though? Use it as a reason for cuts, really.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2019 18:48
|
|
|
thispopactdoesnotexist.com
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2020 13:47
|
|
|
carry on then posted:ban white men from tech I think that's President Obama though? 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2020 19:44
|
|
|
It looks like a pixelated version of the portrait that was in federal buildings? 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2020 20:09
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:no that's a white guy It's a picture of President Obama.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2020 21:37
|
|
|
I mean, the white race is primarily defined by our various criminal conspiracies and acts so I guess it's good to have a tool that will put investigators on the scent of the most-likely criminal (a white)?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2020 18:30
|
|
|
eschaton posted:“this white person probably exists and is awful” In it, voted 5.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Like, ok: so let's play arguendo. Set aside the fact it doesn't seem to loving work (assume that could be fixed): what's the value proposition? What is the path to revenue here?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
Like, if someone's name is listed as "Alex Smith" then maybe just, like, call them "Alex"? I'm legit confused in what context algorithmicly figuring out whether "Mr" or "Ms" Smith is more accurate beats just calling them "Alex"?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2020 20:14
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:presumably its just to pick what kind of ads to send them so the stakes are relatively low Like, I don't "do" marketing or ad-tech or whatever and I have uBlock Origin and PiHole so I don't interact with a lot of ads but It seems like using prior browsing habits might be a smarter way to drive engagement?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2020 20:22
|
|
|
It's in front of an aircraft carrier. Because: of course?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2020 20:23
|
|
|
Does catte has COVID?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2020 00:26
|
|
|
It seems like nasal swab would be v.difficult to get from catte?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2020 00:41
|
|
|
Midjack posted:read the article, bottom of page 2. the argument on this statement is a little convoluted, the author is saying that as gdp goes up general societal trust goes up and he’s using trustworthiness ratings of portraits as a proxy for general societal trust. Is this some sort of weird p-hacking thing like where the cup size of Miss America is inversely correlated to the unemployment rate in Wyoming or something? Like, in what world are "portraits being smiley or frowny" even a variable? 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2020 20:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 11:13 |
|
|
Imagine having quoted a Randalltweet. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2020 15:55
|
|