|
Mega64 posted:I'm having a problem where most of the teams I pick in Parley Bets lose, please fix the games so those teams win instead, thanks. yeah i wasnt gonna say anything but something is clearly broken there
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2019 21:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:40 |
|
|
I've managed to back myself into a corner by using the Chargers, Patriots, Cowboys and Ravens already. That leaves me with the Chiefs or Packers. Leaning Chiefs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2019 14:25
|
|
|
I'm on to you, Ross Just because the Pats won by 43 doesn't mean you get double credit  (see also the Colts and 49ers in week 3  )
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 11:57
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:I'm on to you, Ross Thanks for pointing this out, I've removed the dupes. It seems to be happening more this year-- if anyone can relay a reliable way to reproduce it, much appreciate, also please keep narcing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:Thanks for pointing this out, I've removed the dupes. It seems to be happening more this year-- if anyone can relay a reliable way to reproduce it, much appreciate, also please keep narcing. I would like to narc on myself for making the wrong choices. Please allow me to rechoose, I'm sure I can do better now that the games in question have already happened
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 17:45
|
|
|
Play posted:I would like to narc on myself for making the wrong choices. Please allow me to rechoose, I'm sure I can do better now that the games in question have already happened 
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2019 18:53
|
|
|
I am somehow in the position in Eliminator of thinking taking the Redskins is the best option. And there's three or four other players who think the same. I would like to go back and change my choices so that I'm not in this position today, thanks. I went with "anyone against the dolphins" and that was not smart.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2019 23:20
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I am somehow in the position in Eliminator of thinking taking the Redskins is the best option. And there's three or four other players who think the same. I saw I was about to bet on Washington this week based on my “anyone against Miami”* and changed things just in time. *but also no divisional games.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
Congratulations to the handful of people that feel comfortable staking their unbeaten records on Washington.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2019 15:20
|
|
|
Finally crawled my way back into the black in Funbucks for the season, and somehow I now have a better record in spread eliminator than regular eliminator??? I'm sure this is all sustainable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2019 20:23
|
|
|
corn on the cop posted:Congratulations to the handful of people that feel comfortable staking their unbeaten records on Washington. Well they won without beating the spread, so I'm 6-0 in Eliminator... and 2-4 in Spread Eliminator, lol.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
Can we get an email from SAS Eliminator when all games have spreads available? I've been checking since Tuesday and there's still no spread on Seahawks @ Falcons on the site (mind you, CBS sports has Atlanta +3.5), so I can't finalize spread pick'em bets.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 18:18
|
|
|
Pinnacle doesn't even have that game listed for some reason. I can look at the funbuck line update email and see if that can be repurposed. The real fix is probably moving off pinnacle who have been slow to post lines this season (sorry, elfurbe!)
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2019 18:30
|
|
|
I've manually put in a spread from william hill, caesars and westgate don't have lines yet either. Guess there's still a lot of uncertainty about it. edit: oh, ryan's still an unknown. Yeah, that'd do it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 19:07
|
|
|
Finally taking my Seahawks, this is the last game I'd feel confident on picking them for the rest of the year and if I get busted rooting for the squad against a Falcs team that has fully quit, so be it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 19:18
|
|
|
Gerund posted:Finally taking my Seahawks, this is the last game I'd feel confident on picking them for the rest of the year and if I get busted rooting for the squad against a Falcs team that has fully quit, so be it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 20:07
|
|
|
Bucs are weird, sometimes Winston forgets to catastrophically gently caress up and they have an amazing game out of nowhere.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 20:23
|
|
|
If I've learned anything in the past 10 years or so it's never touch a Bucs game in eliminator ever
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 21:57
|
|
|
Mega64 posted:Bucs are weird, sometimes Winston forgets to catastrophically gently caress up and they have an amazing game out of nowhere. Their defensive line is good enough to give most teams some serious problems. I agree, they're not a team I really want to get involved with in eliminator. Maybe later in the season when I'm more sure about what they are I took the Vikings this week so no worries there, currently sharing the top spot with only 16 other people because most haven't picked. Hey I gotta take my victories where I can find them
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 21:58
|
|
|
My 4 keys to guaranteed* eliminator success: 1 - No Thursdays 2 - No London 3 - No Divisionals 4 - No Bucs * Not a guarantee
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 22:02
|
|
|
shyduck posted:* Not a guarantee The avatar + this footnote is 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 22:10
|
|
|
Anyone who depends on a Bucs QB to have more or less than 2 turnovers in any given game is making a classic mistake!
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2019 22:23
|
|
|
What is even happening right now, come on, dolphins are... winning?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 01:58
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:What is even happening right now, come on, dolphins are... winning? Fitzmagic!
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 01:58
|
|
|
How must people took the Steelers tonight in eliminator?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 03:27
|
|
|
Taerkar posted:How must people took the Steelers tonight in eliminator? 38 out of 161, so second-highest number. Vikings were first with 60 out of 161.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
it was all an illuuuuusssion, fitzpatrick is confirmed as Not Good and I'm 8-0 in Eliminator but 0-8 in Reverse Spread Eliminator
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 04:35
|
|
|
Someone reminded him that they were Totally Not Tanking.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 11:57
|
|
|
Feature request: a way to unselect an eliminator pick without picking another team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 17:54
|
|
|
very nearly went perfect in pick em this week, only dropped one game which was Bills Eagles. A very predictable week overall, this coming week definitely is a bit more ambiguous
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
ulmont posted:Feature request: a way to unselect an eliminator pick without picking another team. why would you want to no-pick a week?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
So you get the reminder to pick when you come back to the site later if you change your mind?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:why would you want to no-pick a week? If you think the game isn't predictable enough you might want to avoid a choice at all, which would put you above players with the same number of wins but more losses I'm not saying I think it's worth the bother to add that feature, but that's a plausible scenario
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
evil roadmap feature, just count no-picks as losses to end all the confusion about "what is a winner" The game is picking winners, if you did not pick a winner that week, you did not succeed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 21:00
|
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:why would you want to no-pick a week? I don't. But if you have a team selected in Eliminator for week 16 (whoever is playing the Dolphins) but realize they might be a better pick for week 9 (when they are playing the Bengals), there's no way to do that right now without making a different pick for week 16 first. I'd like to be able to unpick week 16 (or whatever) so I can choose more freely in week 9.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
ulmont posted:I don't. But if you have a team selected in Eliminator for week 16 (whoever is playing the Dolphins) but realize they might be a better pick for week 9 (when they are playing the Bengals), there's no way to do that right now without making a different pick for week 16 first. I'd like to be able to unpick week 16 (or whatever) so I can choose more freely in week 9. okay that makes a lot more sense than my idea... lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2019 22:18
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:it was all an illuuuuusssion, fitzpatrick is confirmed as Not Good How?! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
Qwijib0 posted:evil roadmap feature, just count no-picks as losses to end all the confusion about "what is a winner" The game is picking winners, if you did not pick a winner that week, you did not succeed. I think they should be worse than a loss because the no pick doesn't use up a team
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 05:26
|
|
|
Taerkar posted:I think they should be worse than a loss because the no pick doesn't use up a team In eliminator I would agree that no pick is a loss. Pick em and the rest like that I'm not so sure, people just miss them because they're busy or whatever, they're still not getting wins and thus unable to move up the leaderboard
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 16:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:40 |
|
|
Play posted:In eliminator I would agree that no pick is a loss. Pick em and the rest like that I'm not so sure, people just miss them because they're busy or whatever, they're still not getting wins and thus unable to move up the leaderboard Or the loving line never shows up until like 12:55 on Sunday. Vikings @ Chiefs (-2.5 at CBS), I'm looking at you. At least let me make the pick before the spread shows up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2019 16:29
|
|