|
Completely forgot about these last year but I'm in on week 1 again. And probably out by week 3.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2019 16:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 14:30 |
|
Are the Bengals going to disappoint me by failing to disappoint?
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2019 23:42 |
|
I'm depending on the Browns to finish this week 8-8.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2019 00:02 |
|
I didn't go with my homerism pick last week and I got burned. Watch me get burned picking the Saints at home this week.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2019 21:22 |
|
*looks at the scores so far* Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue!
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2019 21:12 |
|
JPrime posted:If your bet line is too long it horks the CSS it looks like: 0-4 is impressive. You're the anti-eliminator.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2019 16:18 |
|
You might as well try to go all-in on the eliminator and make it your new reverse eliminator. 0-17 could still be yours.
Taerkar fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Oct 1, 2019 |
# ¿ Oct 1, 2019 18:55 |
|
How must people took the Steelers tonight in eliminator?
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2019 03:27 |
|
Someone reminded him that they were Totally Not Tanking.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2019 11:57 |
|
Qwijib0 posted:evil roadmap feature, just count no-picks as losses to end all the confusion about "what is a winner" The game is picking winners, if you did not pick a winner that week, you did not succeed. I think they should be worse than a loss because the no pick doesn't use up a team
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2019 05:26 |
|
on the bored wop posted:There are sixteen 3-0 players left but about three quarters of them have already used up both the Super Bowl teams drat Titans ruined everything!
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2020 05:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 14:30 |
|
I'm picking Covid every week
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2020 00:02 |