|
I answered neutral on a bunch of questions I actually had opinions on because none of the choices reflected what I actually think.
|
#
¿
Sep 3, 2019 15:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Other species than humans have their own experiences that can’t be ignored, and thus any moral calculus must consider them fully (or as much as we can from our own perspective at least). To say human life takes priority, before you consider any given moral dilemma, is to decide that non-human life has no value outside what it can provide humans. Gotta consult the mosquitoes before we drain this malarial swamp in the middle of the city! Damaging the environment almost always has negative effects on human beings down the road, and should be avoided as much as possible because of that, not because of the lived experience of, say, plague-carrying sewer rats. Vincent Van Goatse has issued a correction as of 05:02 on Sep 4, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Sep 4, 2019 05:00
|
|