|
very general questions, had me hem hawing at some because perspective and context matters~
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2019 13:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 06:49 |
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:MY shtick in this thread will be to get pissed off at anyone who's not an Eco Marxist i have more ecological purity than the eco marxists its bullshit
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2019 15:19 |
|
Calibanibal posted:cram all decentralists into a giant blender and make a meat-blood slurry good luck getting through the bureaucratic red tape to do this, and then seizing another decentralized economy when yours is bollocked from the kleptocratic greed of a central economy as party apparatchiks get fat off the labor because negotiated coordination is post your results or
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2019 22:45 |
|
Peanut President posted:literally republican talking points how else are you supposed to make economic planning fluid and not sluggish with susceptibility to graft and corruption but also not greedy in their own vacuums where other local economies might do better than others based on random factors like weather and geography?~ is there like a way where you can combine the two, because based on the questions i read, i kept thinking about how central planning basically didn't do much in favor if there's a hierarchy of top level managers directing you and exploiting the labor rather than a bunch of groups coordinating throughout regions without undermining each other and working towards a common goal and patching out resource scarcities to complete each other, but its so generalized
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2019 22:58 |
|
Peanut President posted:i ain't reading that poo poo exactly, yer not my boss, and I ain't yers so do whatever the fk u want, decentralize pls
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2019 03:23 |