|
Sharon Grigsby (the author of the Dallas piece on Vic) made it on NBC  https://twitter.com/ANN_Lynzee/status/1171505270490484736
|
#
¿
Sep 10, 2019 22:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 13:22 |
|
|
Piell posted:Court transcript coming soon.  Edit: It's out! https://twitter.com/fsckemall/status/1172649980638556160 Can Of Worms fucked around with this message at 00:18 on Sep 14, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2019 00:10
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:why did the transcript cost so drat much
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2019 00:29
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:Don't you also have to show damages? You can lie about someone as much as you like as long as the lie is so outrageous no one believes it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2019 00:04
|
|
|
Usually you just get the person who made the post to admit they made it (Ty tried doing this with Ron Toye's tweets during his deposition, but he was so incompetent he couldn't even do that), otherwise you have to produce evidence that shows that that specific person made it, the most basic element is showing that the account actually belongs to the person in question. This process is called authentication if you want to google more information about it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2019 01:32
|
|
|
I suspect the statue of limitations has run out for the ones brought up in the affidavits.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2019 12:44
|
|
|
Doucette tweeted something ~*~mysterious~*~ in the twitter thread for Vic's lawsuit: https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181780257919193088 https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1181780991603609600
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2019 06:49
|
|
|
What did Bosch do to get lumped with the rest of these idiots?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2019 01:17
|
|
|
Hub Cat posted:Hmmm, worth pointing out that response was not drafted by Beard wonder if there is some trouble in paradise
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2019 02:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1191831271091179520
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2019 23:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1192557038854950912 Hoping real hard for a transcript.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2019 00:30
|
|
|
The theory I've seen on lawtwitter is it's a deterrent for appeals, as the defendants can cross appeal (and will likely win) if Vic decides to appeal.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
Phobophilia posted:I dunno I see people spout how Vic is innocent in random boards and threads all the time these days. No one defended him in the past because he wasn’t a rallying cry for fighting the feminazis. Now, they’ll ignore past precedence for convenience. Vic has a dedicated fanbase that his mom is in charge of who both believes him when he does his "I didn't mean to offend people" act, and are willing to go hog wild on his accusers. There's either a screenshot of him in Discord telling his fans to "do whatever they can to fight the accusations" (paraphrased) or it was mentioned in tweets.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Sanctions hearing transcript is up, linked in Doucette/Shane Holmberg's timeline. Can't post the link myself at the moment, unfortunately.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2020 23:44
|
|
|
Namtab posted:I mean he's appealing the court case he ain't gonna do a stream saying "actually theyre right i am a piece of poo poo, legally" He will, however, admit under oath that he has no evidence of his claims.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2020 11:02
|
|
|
 https://twitter.com/ljmontello/status/1224738082345246720
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PoorlyAgedStuff/status/1236734585477697537 Replies are basically what you'd expect.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2020 00:45
|
|
|
The appeal briefs have been filed (but aren't publically available at this very moment), and they're going to be quite the read if this is anything to go by: https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1245203238275735554 And this is the expected schedule for the remaining motions: https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1245206119179575296
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2020 05:28
|
|
|
The briefs are up: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11tkLVqqJQoj8ZWTq8zl4lXfvRO7KqBT1/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aDWmqnW2b87ih4XjJ4_eudSmfaI6W1lu/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F01kmdiWvlOZQvHOJZAURooCOIS5a5P0/view Some excerpts:  
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2020 03:16
|
|
|
Wark Say posted:But is the payday gonna be worth it in the end? From everything I've seen, they can actually sanction Beard and co. for wasting people's times doing this quarter-assed job.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2020 19:45
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:As far as I know, to get somewhere in a malpractice suit you have to have a case that was somewhat viable. Vic doesn't really have that with the possible exception of Toye accusing him of having assaulted hundreds of women.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2020 17:53
|
|
|
quote:Bold mine. And the last part seems important, if I'm understanding correctly that it means this case would actually have to be winnable for there to be malpractice, not just that Mignogna could have done "better". Yeah, I'll have to concede on that. I thought I found some case law that showed it was possible to win a malpractice suit with a losing case, but if it existed I can no longer find it; the closest things I've found are Elizondo v. Krist (Tex. 2013) and Rogers v. Zanetti (Tex. 2017), but neither covered guaranteed losing cases. quote:(Elizondo v. Krist) The Court noted that the plaintiff’s burden is to prove the difference between the result obtained for the client and “the result that would have been obtained with competent counsel” – not necessarily the result “if the case had been tried to a final judgment.” quote:(Rogers v. Zanetti) The Texas Supreme Court has made clear that a plaintiff must provide competent proof of both elements of cause in fact—that the malpractice was “a substantial factor” in bringing about the injury and that the injury would not have occurred “but for” the malpractice.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2020 08:46
|
|
|
Zeether posted:Good god He's doubling down. Well, given the amount of clips it's more like quintupling down at this point. Can Of Worms fucked around with this message at 03:21 on Aug 31, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2020 03:17
|
|
|
That actually looks better than the actual Funko Pop Sonic by virtue of not having the default Funko eyes.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2020 05:46
|
|
|
Nick Rekieta is planning on filing an amicus brief (and yes the deadline for filing briefs has passed.) If you don't know what that means the replies to the tweet should provide ample context. https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1308431730475438083
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2020 18:12
|
|
|
The amicus brief was filed. https://twitter.com/questauthority/status/1310759486701948929
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2020 23:21
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:Is Vic seriously still paying them
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2022 21:17
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:it's even more attenuated than that, isn't it? my impression was Nick raised all the money/outrage/profile for Vic before he ever met Vic and basically approached him with the pitch, "I raised this huge war chest for your cause on youtube. I have a real winner of a case and a texas attorney ready to go if you just sign here!"
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2022 22:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 13:22 |
|
|
Soylent Pudding posted:It's important to emphasize that his lawyers were hilariously incompetent and obviously more concerned with trying to become stars on the culture war circuit than effectively trying the case. To clarify this point a bit more, it was about money rather than attention from the culture war goofs; the lawyer who spearheaded the lawsuit started a Gofundme campaign specifically for that purpose, to the point that Vic has no access to these funds. They milked his fanbase out of at least 250k during the whole thing, and Vic could probably recoup some of his losses by suing them for malpractice, but probably won't.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2024 06:52
|
|