Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Chuka Umana posted:

I was driving around southeastern Ohio over the weekend and holy cow it looks terrible. just endless miles of abandoned buildings punctuated by dollar general and fast food places. everything including the people look run down and miserable.

also the massive trailer parks with stores selling beer and cigarettes at the front.

how the gently caress does this happen? what happened to the new deal and the great society?

I want this thread to be able to function as a place to talk about poverty and it’s regional variance in the US.

the poverty is more visible in the countryside

the structural and infrastructural design of cities tends to make it less obvious, with the poors hidden away in tiny rat-infested apartments behind historic building facades

upscale suburbs tend to rely on zoning, code enforcement, and police action to quickly banish any visible sign of poverty. happiness is mandatory, citizen. put it all on your credit card, and we'll evict you the instant you hit your limit

rural areas don't tend to have existing structures to hide the poverty, and being less dense and more sprawly means they tend to draw less of that NIMBY spirit, and they're a lot less likely to draw gentrifiers.

sorry if this is undermining any plans to draw the thread to a "wealthy urban ivory tower leftists just don't understand the real poverty that only rural conservatives understand" tack!!!!!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

FactsAreUseless posted:

"Cancel culture" sounds like some right-wing "political correctness" bullshit, it doesn't pass the smell test. Someone post the Fox News screenshots about it of which I assume there are many.

yeah, p much. it's started as an extremely online far-right meme that's only lately been picked up by Fox. originally referred to celebrities getting fired for being racists or rapists, but its meaning expanded as it spread, so now it's p much just a mix of "political correctness" and "another shot fired in the leftist war to end conservative free speech"

example usages:
https://mobile.twitter.com/riordainn/status/1128416225556611074
https://mobile.twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1170097496841785344
https://mobile.twitter.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1170160691711553542

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Finicums Wake posted:

that's how it's usually used. but i did read an opinion piece by a genuine leftist that used the term, and usefully juxtaposed it with discursive/social practices rooted in restorative justice

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/opinion/sunday/cancel-culture-call-out.html

this is just the usual "instead of being mean to racists and rapists, why don't we try being nice to them and winning them over with love" stuff

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Ace of Baes posted:

why are you lumping racists together with rapists? they are very different concepts lol
most Americans are racist from a life of propaganda, and can be educated and taught this is false, thinking it's about being nice or mean is a very weird reaction rooted in liberal individualism

because that's what the article is doing, and what the "cancel culture" whine in general usually does

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply