|
500 good dogs posted:I've given more than a thousand dollars to this fund and agree with the Animals man here -- I don't even know why the bare minimum threshold of transparency is somehow controversial. If you are talking about an anonymous in/out tally I don't think there is much opposition, but this poo poo started with people demanding Plinkey prove he isn't skimming. The bare minimum isn't enough for that. That requires a more cumbersome and less anonymous system, as you can see in the other thread. The conflation of "bare minimum" to mean both an actual minimum and a minimum of proof of innocence, is why any critique gets met with aggro. A "bare minimum" seems reasonable to you because you assume the former, while it looks unreasonable to others because they assume the latter.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2022 21:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 02:22 |
|
500 good dogs posted:yes that makes sense, but lousy hat started screaming in response to someone literally asking for a simple in/out tally lol: Unfortunately there has been a lot of trolling about the issue, so people are getting pretty raw
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2022 21:55 |
|
Fsmhunk posted:I'm glad about the new fund. Anyone looking for help, that thread is the place to go. Should probably gas this one to avoid any confusion, since these request are often time sensitive and the new thread seems far more responsive at this point. The new thread only covers the US, so they aren't covering the same ground.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2022 18:41 |