Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
In.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face

cda posted:

In

Also here is a link to an extremely good poem about death: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/48422/aubade-56d229a6e2f07

You rear end in a top hat, now all I can think of is I will never write anything half as good so why bother.

Larkin is great.

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Sorry

Sorry, kid: we can’t call Grandma
(Not tonight and not tomorrow, nor beyond,
And it breaks my heart you’re asking
With that dimple smile of which she was so fond.)

I know we saw her last month, kid
(And she cuddled you and rocked you while we ate
Never knew you stay so quiet, kid
Or to finish every mouthful from your plate.)

She won’t sing your favourite song, kid
(That’s the only way to make you take your meds
When the songs I sing are wrong, kid
And our clothes are stained and nerves are all in shreds.)

I’m not saying no out of spite, kid
(And it’s taking all the patience that I’ve got
To not react to that bite, kid,
To make soothing sounds and clean up all the snot.)

I can’t make you understand, kid
(Even though we had the funeral today
You mostly wanted to run off, kid
And you thought that everyone was there to play.)

Sorry, kid: we can’t call Grandma
(And drat the picture on the pamphlet on the pew
That made you remember Grandma
When she will nevermore remember you.)

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Congrats rickiep00h
prooooooooooompt

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face

sephiRoth IRA posted:

I’m not saying those people didn’t deserve to win, it’s more akin to “I am trash, will always be trash, into the landfill with me”

All the greatest artists are tortured souls, so you're just fitting in!

I'll judge the brawl. To offset the fairly wrenching prompt we've just had, I want to see pleasant poems about wholesome nature things like trees or brooks. Extra credit if you fit in a pleasant meter such as iambs or anapaests and some sort of rhyming scheme.

E: deadline is midnight GMT next Saturday I guess

Maugrim fucked around with this message at 02:28 on Feb 9, 2020

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Fair crit, thanks Saucy, no complaints there!

What I do object to is that after explicitly forbidding free verse you gave the win to the only submission written in free verse. This is stupid and I want to brawl you for it.

Rickiep00h, nobody can steal your prompt! I just stepped up to judge a minor side contest.

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
A lot can depend on accent. In my accent (non-rhotic, close to British RP) I'm more comfortable treating fire as one syllable than two

"The fire had fed my furious lust" is 8 syllables (four iambs) to me

But I'd be OK reading "the fire made me furious" as eight syllables too if that was required to make sense of a poem's metre.

E: personally i would go so far as to say individual syllables are meaningless to poetic form except insofar as they are used to make the feet, which are the true building blocks of metre. I think this is why I don't accept that rickie's poem isn't free verse - breaking the lines into ten syllables doesn't change how it's read, and without those breaks it's (admittedly nice) prose.

So my brawl challenge remains open

Maugrim fucked around with this message at 20:49 on Feb 9, 2020

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face

rickiep00h posted:

In the interest of not being a snooty elitist I'm going going to respond except to say that I don't think we understand poetic formalism (or line breaks!) in remotely the same terms.

Please do school me, I'm here to learn! PM me if you like. Or don't.

In for the prompt. What time zone is the deadline?

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
I get the not wanting to derail so I'll just echo thanks for the thoughtful/thought-provoking post and reading recommendations. I personally enjoy the process of wrestling words into formal structures and have a strong preference for reading poems with simple lyrical metre but that doesn't at all mean I look down on other forms. I was just absolutely convinced that what you'd written was free verse and I guess you've persuaded me otherwise. :v:

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Thank you for your submissions, both of which I have enjoyed. Judgement will be forthcoming this evening.

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Azza BambiRoth IRA brawl judgement:

This is close! As I start writing this, I don't yet know who I'm going to award the win to, although I have an initial slight favourite. I enjoyed both poems and both more-or-less hit the prompt.

sephiRoth IRA - Branch Promise

Interesting title, odd enough that it made me look for some kind of wordplay, although if it's there I'm not clever enough to find it. From the mention of glacier at the start I assumed this was a coniferous forest in a cold country, but then later you mention oak and elm which typically inhabit temperate biomes. After many readings, I still didn't feel like I'd fully grasped the story you're telling - at least not from the words themselves.

Fortunately, there's more to this than just the words. This poem is largely written in trochees - a foot consisting of a stressed, then an unstressed syllable, the reverse of an iamb. Where iambs are free-flowing, bouncing you easily onto the stressed syllables, trochees are ponderous, weighty, grandiose. Which isn't what I asked for in the prompt - but I forgive you, because it's a perfect choice for the poem you've written. It evokes the unstoppable march of the seasons, the slow heartbeat of the forest. Combine that with the sonorous vowel sounds you've incorporated, and this poem echoed in my head in the booming voice of an ent. It's a reflection on the long slow existence of trees, with a hint of the promise of spring.

quote:

Creak and thrum, the forest groans.
Glacier flows in frosty pond, into, surely - unless it's a really tiny glacier
yet we grow in mossy thrones. "yet" doesn't deserve a stress so the rhythm stumbles here.
Melting frost, pale sun has dawned;
shining oak and yew in groves.
Write in roots and stems a song
within the humming of the droves; why "within" rather than "in"? An odd departure from the metre. Droves of what?
live an oath and sway along. I don't know what "live an oath" means

Azza Bamboo - As Spring Comes

A much more straightforward offering in terms of the story it tells, and appealing to me as a lover of hill walking. You've got one big stumble in the rhythm, and several cases of awkward wording and word order to try and retain the rhythm. But you've also got some pleasing imagery and I liked your final couplet a lot.

quote:

Exchange of seasons over rolling moors.
Harsh winter’s final winds drink our skin’s heat. the rhythm stumbles here on "drink our"
This warmth spring’s early beaming sun restores, "beaming" adds nothing here, find a more interesting word
along bright fields of golden waving wheat. adjective order - see below

This path whose earth does fill the tread of shoes, "does fill" is a common but super clumsy way to stick to metre, you should try hard to avoid it
bears marks of those who fell before my walk. on first reading this sounds as though you're killing people by walking over them
Wet earth that slips like grease, and thus I choose
to tread the grass’ green emerging stalks. adjective order
I found this stanza out of whack in tone compared to the rest of the poem. But on reflection I like the juxtaposition. Sometimes we look up and enjoy the beauty of the countryside. Sometimes we have to watch where we're putting our feet.

To crest hills tall and face blue open sky, adjective order
where roaring winds like waves do crash and flow. "do crash" ew
Embrace this tide with open arms that I awkward place to end the line. And I don't think it's you dancing, but your hair and clothes, right?
might dance like purple creeping phlox below.

I hold the winter’s winds at season’s end.
All seasons, harsh or fair, are welcome friends. This is nice :unsmith:

Adjectives! You've got lots of them. In places where you've got several on the same noun, the ordering often seems to go a bit skew-whiff, even when it's not necessary to fit the metre. I don't know if this is a deliberate attempt to sound more poetic, but it's probably best avoided. Here's Mark Forsyth in The Elements of Eloquence, a lovely little book I happen to have on my desk here, in the chapter on hyperbaton (the rhetorical trick of messing with word order):

Mark Forsyth posted:

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien wrote his first story aged seven. It was about a 'green great dragon'. He showed it to his mother who told him that you absolutely couldn't have a green great dragon, and that it had to be a great green one instead. Tolkien was so disheartened that he never wrote another story for years.

The reason for Tolkien's mistake, since you ask, is that adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun. So you can have a lovely little old rectangular green French silver whittling knife. But if you mess with that word order in the slightest you’ll sound like a maniac. It’s an odd thing that every English speaker uses that list, but almost none of us could write it out. And as size comes before colour, green great dragons can't exist.

(The whole book is written like this, it's such an easy read and I thoroughly recommend it.)


gently caress, I've really gone on here haven't I? Okay, here's your judgement. sephiRoth IRA takes the win because, for me, their poem evoked a consistent mood and used the metre to support the content really well. But Azza's poem has plenty of good in it too. Thanks guys.

Maugrim fucked around with this message at 01:26 on Feb 14, 2020

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
The example he created with the whittling knife is over-egged for the sake of humour, frankly. When you have that many adjectives you sound insane regardless of the order! It's easier if you just look at two adjectives - the "green great dragon" example (which is why I expanded the standard meme quote to include it).

If phrases like "green great dragon", "old little lady", or "whittling French knife" don't sound odd to you, there may be something unusual about the way you process language. I'm not gonna tell you to sit down with a list every time you use multiple adjectives, don't worry. At any rate the three examples in your poem - "golden waving wheat", "green emerging stalks", "blue open sky" - are less egregious than any of those, they sound subtly wrong to my ear but not insanely wrong.

Maugrim fucked around with this message at 09:17 on Feb 14, 2020

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
The Treasures of Peterborough Abbey

pronunciation guide for non-British readers:
Ely – “Ee lee”
Peterborough – “Peter bruh”


William of Normandy
strides into England: he
swears he is rightful king -
takes the land promised him -
All know these measures.

Four years later he
orders a travesty:
from all the monasteries
in that fair land to seize
all of their treasures.

Hereward – outlaw he –
camped on the isle of Ely,
hears of the monarch’s plan –
summons his outlaw band,
sails to the abbey.

“As I love God,” quoth he,
“No cur of Normandy
shall have the smallest pin
sacred to God within
Peterborough Abbey.”

Monks they refuse his plea,
suffer him no entry:
so from the walls they dash,
burn all the town to ash,
burn the monks’ houses.

Through burning gates they break,
drive out the monks, and take
crown of the Lord divine,
crucifix, coin and shrine,
golden and silver.

Drag they this hoard from there –
haul it to Ely, where
Danish ships bear it forth
back to their homeland north,
safe in church stow it.

Afterwards

through their own carelessness,
and through their drunkenness,
in [but] one night the church
and all that was therein
was consumed by fire.


- From the Peterborough Chronicle, A.D. 1070 – as translated here

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
I just realised the sub deadline was changed to tonight so I didn't have to rush that

O wel

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Thank you for the crit! I didn't like the prompt much at first (couldn't think of anything I wanted to document) but I actually enjoyed learning about this kind of poetry, and I learned some history in the process of writing it. Which I'm sure was your intention. Good stuff.

Prooooompt

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Sounds fun, I'm in

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Fizzicky fozzicky
Werner Karl Heisenberg
claimed you can't measure both
placement and speed;

Only applies to the
submicroscopical
never mind protests of
drivers on weed.

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Oh! I wasn't expecting that. Right then, let me crack open my copy of The Elements of Eloquence to a random page...

"Personification". That'll do. Prosopopoeia if we want to get highfalutin. Best used in little doses to create vivid unexpected images;

Iago posted:

O, beware, my lord, of jealousy;
It is the green-eyed monster which doth mock
The meat it feeds on;

Tends to get a bit silly if you carry on for much longer. Well, let's try it anyway! I don't mind a bit of silly.

Pick an abstract concept and personify it in verse. I'm not going to dictate form but let's keep it snappy: max of either 8 lines or 60 words, whichever you prefer (yes, that means you can have 8 lines of 100 words each if you really want).

If you want me to assign you your subject, you can request a flash rule.

No porn. After last week in Thunderdome I feel a need to specify that.

Signups close Wednesday 24th June.
Judgement will occur on Wednesday 1st July, but if everyone submits early then I'll judge early.

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Okay I guess that was a poo poo prompt! Signups will remain open until the submission deadline (end of next Tuesday) and I will also accept acrostic poems or limericks on any topic.

Maugrim fucked around with this message at 10:32 on Jun 23, 2020

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Yep, signups are so open you hardly even need to do it. Just post your poem personifying an abstract concept, or a limerick or acrostic poem on any topic, by the time I check the thread on Wednesday!

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
Welp I guess it's Wednesday

With a grand total of one entry I declare The Juggernaut our...

Wait what's this

The Juggernaut posted:

Spoken word,
ink to paper,
the sound of the drum,
paint to canvas.
To express yourself
and to be understood.
Is life's greatest enjoyment

Thus dies the

Pretty certain that's no limerick.
Opens - S.. i.. t.. p.. T.. a.. I..
Endings - d.. r.. m.. s.. f.. d.. t..
Meaningful acrostic this is not.
Dumb I may be (seriously, I'd be
Overjoyed to be corrected) but
My poor brain can't find a person here.
Ergo, poem does not meet the prompt.

(While I have to disqualify you, I will say thanks for submitting something! I did enjoy your poem, just couldn't see how it fit the constraints.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Maugrim
Feb 16, 2011

I eat your face
All good. I don't know where poemdome goes from here though. I guess if OP turns up or enough people want to kick it off again... Or if The Juggernaut wants to go ahead and hit us with a prompt?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply