This week: https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1219416766599847936 The OP from before the hearings posted:Since there's going to be literally months more of this poo poo coming up, here's a thread for the impeachment investigation, the future impeachment trial, and the associated public hearings. Previous titles: Impeachment Thread: Donald Trump in Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing please try to post about the impeachment of Donald J Trump in this thread, not the primaries, nor the 2020 election, thank you in advance eke out fucked around with this message at 02:38 on Jan 21, 2020 |
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2019 22:05 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 07:10 |
So the guy who overheard Sondland's call with Trump has just been officially added: https://twitter.com/jeremyherb/status/1196539705992601601
|
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2019 23:34 |
https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1196561847438204928 https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1196563063362785282 it seems like Eisenberg is in the throw-Sondland-under-the-bus faction, and Sondland is in the throw-Eisenberg-under-the-bus faction eke out fucked around with this message at 00:05 on Nov 19, 2019 |
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 00:01 |
thread on the letter Ron Johnson put out today about what he knew : https://twitter.com/HayesBrown/status/1196565580674936833 https://twitter.com/HayesBrown/status/1196569375333109760 (he really should be recused from any trial but lol of course that'll never happen) eke out fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Nov 19, 2019 |
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 00:31 |
Otteration posted:Thanks for the thread! Hoping to the random orbs of the Universe that both the orange fecal smear and the rest of us live long enough to see it get hit by one of those tiny orbs only after a conviction in the Senate. yeah ideally, outside of hearings, this thread won't be as crazy and will have a more direct stream of news about the specific topic it'll take some of the TVIV burden off USPOL, but hopefully also work as a more specialized spot for people who don't want scroll through five pages of chik-fil-a discussion to see what impeachment news broke
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 02:01 |
https://twitter.com/Olivia_Gazis/status/1196598564731924482
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 02:32 |
https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1196614308068806657 Hannity seems a little worried that all these people are testifying about how US foreign policy runs through him
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 03:40 |
here's the preview of Vindman's testimony today https://twitter.com/mateagold/status/1196625849602248707
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 13:10 |
Ehud posted:What is the deal with the "Schiff knows the identity of the whisteblower" sign that the Republicans keep trotting out? nah the whistleblowers attorneys at one point reached out to HPSCI, but were told to go through the IG process instead, which they did. no indication they did anything except briefly talk to staffers while keeping their client anonymous (which of course they would do) https://twitter.com/EliStokols/status/1196796440326090754 eke out fucked around with this message at 15:25 on Nov 19, 2019 |
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:23 |
extremely strong "i wish i was anywhere but here" energy from today's witnesses
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:31 |
refleks posted:I know gently caress all about military code, but is he required to show up in uniform for these things? All the photos I have seen of him has been in full uniform. yeah it's protocol for active duty military to wear dress uniforms when going before congress
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:33 |
Wylie posted:Williams is basically providing cover for Pence today, then? Ok. if she was trying to cover i think she'd say more than 'I don't know if he read what I gave him about the call with Zelensky' at least, i think confirming that Pence probably should have known about it, but did his best to not know, doesn't count as covering
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:40 |
eviltastic posted:I think it would be worth adding a blurb to the very good first post about the Bidens / Burisma explaining the underlying conspiracy theory and why it is bonkers. this is a good idea, i'll do it sometime later
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:44 |
for those not able to watch live, here's Rupar's thread, he generally updates steadily with video clips https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1196802949919465473
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:58 |
oh i didn't know Williams also confirmed that the call said "Burisma" and not "the company" like the transcript said
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 15:59 |
zonohedron posted:Interesting; I didn't expect Williams's lawyer to prevent her from answering "did anything happen on the call that is relevant to our inquiry", but her expression when she said "I would be very happy to testify in a classified session" suggests there's definitely something in her mind. i hadn't heard anything about this either, here's what looks to be the relevant stuff she said previously https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1196805708056014848
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:02 |
zonohedron posted:This is Goldman, the Dems' counsel, and he's trying to illustrate that nobody in the government would have suggested that Trump ask Zelenskyy about, or ask him for, anything that Trump did ask about/for. yeah, the whole line of attack Republicans will be leading with is like "This is just some bureaucrat that hates Trump and was mad about his foreign policy." the point is, what Trump was asking for has nothing to do with our foreign policy, and if he did care about corruption, he'd be asking about MUCH bigger corrupt entities in Ukraine that our official policy IS actually worried about like, for instance, the oligarch that has been behind Zelensky's rise to power, who's stolen a ludicrous amount of money and we would very much like Zelensky to distance himself from and hold accountable
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:11 |
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1196808698779328513
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:14 |
Strange Poon posted:is it just me or is this stuff out of vindman way more damning than the already very damning stuff we've heard he's the first person to testify that heard the call live, speaks both languages used fluently, and immediately thought it was hosed so yeah
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:17 |
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Vindman seems like not the typical military shithead. his demeanor really undercuts the attacks that he's like some brash, insubordinate nevertrumper who had poor judgment like if nothing else, he seems extremely thoughtful and reserved
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:20 |
sondland directly talking about investigations into "the bidens, burisma, and 2016" is one of the key events herebobjr posted:I don’t know if he has family but considering Dr. Ford and what she had to do with the threats, it’s probably horrifying what threats are coming at him and what to worry about after this is all over still. there was reporting this morning that the army is considering moving his family to a base to protect them, so yeah, it's safe to say they're getting a lot of threats
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:26 |
refleks posted:Who is the lawyer for Williams? Someone from WH or State or someone she hired herself? everyone's only got private lawyers, no one has counsel from the government (government lawyers are not allowed in the private depositions for sure, and i think wouldn't be allowed here either)
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:34 |
Vindman doing a good job with the core right thing to do, not accepting that facts not in evidence are true just because the questioner states them
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:38 |
here comes the "trying to out the whistleblower" part
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:39 |
literally not even trying to defend trump anymore
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:42 |
lmao the rank
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:44 |
this is exactly what happened in Vindman's deposition by the way, and they threw this exact same fit Volkov, btw, did a really good job in the depo and has been restrained so far, but repeatedly owned republicans in that transcript
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:45 |
smug n stuff posted:Vindman's lawyer looks exactly like Dennis Prager unfortunately if i google what prager looks like it'll probably poison my youtube recommendations forever
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:48 |
evilweasel posted:nunes also knows who the alleged whistleblower is, so if he could get a witness to say their name he would suddenly start asking a whole hell of a lot of questions about them i think that the guy the far-right is claiming is the whistleblower wouldn't have had a need-to-know about any of this, since he was already taken off the NSC after a previous far-right conspiracy got him removed in like 2017 so, assuming Vindman is telling the literal truth, probably the guy he talked to wasn't the whistleblower. but it'd make it easier to then harass that guy and start piecing together who did
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 16:55 |
this guy is really bad at thisPlasticAutomaton posted:What the gently caress is this question line about Canada. that entire line of questioning was just "Well you can't prove that Trump pulled Pence from the Ukraine inauguration to punish Ukraine for not investigating, can you?"
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:03 |
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Is there a second hearing for later today? yes; schedule in op
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:05 |
zonohedron posted:So when high school kids get taught how to cross-examine opposing debaters, they're instructed not to ask questions where they don't know the answer; they're not asking because they're curious, they're asking so that the judge (or panel of judges, in finals rounds) hears the answer. yeah part of why he's so bad at this is that he already had literally hours at a deposition to feel out the answers to ALL these questions, yet he still keeps asking questions that are damaging to his case, like https://twitter.com/lrozen/status/1196821548671340549 the average viewer doesn't even know that they cancelled a Pence visit to punish Ukraine. now they know something shady happened, which they didn't suspect before, even if they don't know exactly why
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:08 |
https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1196823455318102016
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:12 |
lol i turned on CNN and the first to speak was jeffrey toobin: "There was a sound you could hear in the testimony today, which was republican talking points falling apart"
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:21 |
tek79 posted:Random thought/question regarding the whistleblower. Does Schiff know who the person is? And is it possible that they've already testified, are currently testifying, or are scheduled to testify, but just their anonymity as being the actual whistleblower has been/will be kept? That is to say, is it possible we've already heard from them or will hear from them but the public isn't aware? we basically know that the whistleblower is someone who wasn't on the call, but (per NYT/WaPo) was a ukraine-expert at the CIA. no one could possibly fit the bill that's testified so far
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:23 |
SalTheBard posted:Does anyone have a link to the "call me Lt Col" soundbite? https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1196819899160629250
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:23 |
lmao no one who watched that testimony could possibly think that that guy is some insubordinate rash hothead
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:26 |
Angry_Ed posted:Pretty sure Sean Davis didn't watch it he's probably been on a call with Whoever Funds The Federalist so he can be told what to write
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:27 |
schiff is good at redirect
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:37 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 07:10 |
good for Himes "that may have come cloaked in a Brooks Brothers suit and parliamentary language but that was designed exclusively to give the right-wing media an opening to question your loyalty"
|
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2019 17:54 |