|
He's straight up calling out the President on the personal attacks. Didn't expect that.
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 15:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 21:51 |
|
|
Not sure I've heard about the September 13 call. Anyone know what's up with that?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 15:49
|
|
|
Uh I pressed CTRL-F and didn't see that word at all. Checkmate.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 17:58
|
|
|
Dave Grool posted:"It's not technically bribery" is the defense they're going with? It's so much worse than that. It's: fact witnesses that shouldn't be making criminal judgments have never done so therefore no crime was committed.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 17:59
|
|
|
Angry_Ed posted:"You never spoke to the President so how can you advise him" The implication here is really funny. Since the President doesn't read, your indirect advice in the form of written materials clearly wasn't absorbed, ergo, you don't advise the President.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 18:15
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Did he really just say "you are not a jagoff?" Beaten badly
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 18:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Isikoff/status/1196894754379837440?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 22:02
|
|
|
queeb posted:lmao administrative error what the gently caress Yeah I mean, I imagine entry and removal from this system isn't the easiest thing in the world. Very hard to believe off the bat.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:DOJ would have to charge him though... The best response to this I've seen is: a new admin might arrive in 14 months. I don't know what the statute of limitations is on perjury, but if it's more than that, a new AG could bring those charges.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 14:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/woodruffbets/status/1197145143394078721?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 14:44
|
|
|
eke out posted:now that Sondland seems to be actually cooperating, he's given democrats an out for why they shouldn't charge him for his changes in story, that the real blame should fall on Pompeo for obstruction Yeah this is clearly his angle here. It's probably going to work.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 15:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BretBaier/status/1197171206471979008?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 16:15
|
|
|
Of course I know what it means now, but I didn't know at the time. Hoo boy
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 16:20
|
|
|
Lord Hydronium posted:Teapot Dumb 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 16:28
|
|
|
eke out posted:the "he had to announce them, not do them" bit is so good Yes! I'm annoyed that Schiff kinda brushed that distinction aside.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 16:32
|
|
|
He just said "of course Burisma=Bidens" That's uh, a big piece there.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 16:44
|
|
|
Nunez didn't want to go right away...
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
lol he didn't say go talk to rudy, he said talk to rudy! See? Big difference!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 17:35
|
|
|
1glitch0 posted:I accept this because of this timeline, but continue to be baffled without more information. Didn't Trump get involved with A$AP when he was in trouble overseas or something?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
Schiff gives another 30 minute round. Nice.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 18:07
|
|
|
: Reads Volker revision: "Does that sum up your thoughts as well? " "It does." Spectacular.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 18:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1197210358328569856?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Quote this post if you want the ‘I want nothing’ Gang Tag whenever it gets uploaded. I WANT NOTHING
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
Blind Rasputin posted:You know, just because she has a british accent doesn’t mean she’s smarter than everybody. [Citation needed]
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 16:46
|
|
|
I don't understand why the Javelins are being discussed. Is it really just "Trump did something Obama wouldn't do?" Maybe to bolster the argument that Trump wanted to help them? Like "why would he extort them if he already gave them missiles?"
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:18
|
|
|
Am I supposed to agree with them that it isn't okay to do oppo research in foreign countries? Because I see no problem with that. A campaign is a private entity. If my oppo research leads me abroad, so be it.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:23
|
|
|
Strange Poon posted:nunes pulling some "they did it and are corrupt so we have to be corrupt too" that the base seems to eat up But again, what is wrong with a private entity like a campaign paying a foreign national to do oppo research? IDGI
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:28
|
|
|
Wow, that's the soundbite there. He was on a domestic political errand. We were doing US foreign policy. How did Castor let her go there? LOL
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:38
|
|
|
Seven Hundred Bee posted:basically they were trying to get her to say that Sondland had lied about things (AND THEREFORE WAS A LIAR) and it backfired horribly Totally. She's like, uh he was informing everyone as his email yesterday showed. He just had a different mission.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:40
|
|
|
Dunite posted:I'm at the dentist. Is it appropriate to stream Hill putting the clamps on Nunes? As it turns out, you and Castor are having similar experiences.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
Sorry if I missed this from earlier, but why are the other committee's lawyers testifying?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2019 19:36
|
|
|
I don't understand why Goldman didn't just say, uh no one ordered it, when you get call records the whole point is to figure out who they called around certain times. It's the whole point.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2019 19:52
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:Why is Pelosi supporting Trump's trade deal on the same day she calls up two articles for impeachment?? My best guess is they think it'll defuse some of the partisan framing of impeachment? That's all I got. It ain't much.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
Regardless of the outcome, I must admit, the articles are a bit therapeutic to read. I think the limited scope is a good idea. They're straightforward and understandable.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
There's been talk in this thread that moving to the trial and then using Roberts to rule on calling important witnesses like Bolton and Mulvaney is a good strategy, but it seems like not calling any witnesses at all might be on the table? https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1204782667352461312?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2019 17:39
|
|
|
eke out posted:https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1206282500303134727 Yeah I also like this idea. I don't see an obvious downside to it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2019 14:19
|
|
|
I know Politico is a bit of a rag but I don't think I've heard this said out loud before: https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1206666045861302274?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
eke out posted:also lol even the republican voter base thinks top trump aides should testify, because they've been successfully convinced nothing wrong happened and he will be totally vindicated Yep. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mcconnell-white-house-privately-at-odds-senate-trial-format This piece claims the WH wants the trial to be long and a spectacle, and McConnell wanting it to be short. I hope Dems are thinking of ways to further goad Trump into pushing for a showy, extended trial.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2019 18:01
|
|
|
LeeMajors posted:What do we call a plurality of constitutional crises? Constituionals crisisii
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2019 14:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 21:51 |
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:i think they are trying to make this weeks conversation about impeachment and let trump stew and have tantrums and try to force the senate into a fairish trial. Agreed. Might work too. I think there are 4+ R Senators that will back witnesses and documents in the trial.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2019 03:44
|
|