|
echinopsis posted:idk why u just don’t make a good product rather than focus really hard on making a half rear end middle project making a good software is impossible. agile is about never running out of things to do, so management and customers can believe forever that quality is just over the horizon. with releases you have pesky discontinuities encouraging reflection and hindsight and realizing that this isn’t working, never worked, and never will work
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2019 04:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 03:15 |
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:For serious though the fundamental thing about "agile" is just trying to get everybody involved to confront and internalize the fact that the work is probably going to be done wrong the first time, and large parts of it are going to need doing again. Whereas waterfall bakes in the attractive and fundamentally dumb assumption that once you get to the end you're done and you can stop. ya like I said. it’s a way to prevent management and users from ever realizing that not just has the software never been good, it will never be good
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2019 22:00
|
|
|
agile is evolutionarily adaptive for software teams and this explains 100% of its success; teams that don’t call themselves agile are more likely to be disbanded. over time, this results in agile taking over the industry and looking like a good idea. any effect on software quality is incidental
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2019 22:03
|
|