|
Captain Foo posted:lol Comcast
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2024 21:45 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 22:11 |
|
multiple default routes work just fine but if you're using provider-assigned address space from multiple providers of course you'll need some policy rules to make sure source address selection is performed correctly hell you can even put a whole rear end routing table in a linux box
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2024 15:38 |
|
yeah if we're talking about the miktrotik CLI it's a little bit quirky and bespoke but it probably compares favorably to the rats nest of dozens of quirky and bespoke formats that is /etc/* on a linux box with equivalent services? i do disable all the winbox, web interface, HTTP API, etc. garbage on mikrotiks, though, that poo poo's awful
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 20:17 |
|
i mean you probably don't want to think too much about all those CVE's in mikrotik's homegrown protocol implementations since they didn't want to use off the shelf daemons
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 20:23 |
|
well i definitely just got trolled into looking up whether that's real or not
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2024 04:13 |
|
Progressive JPEG posted:
what's wrong with apt-get install dnsmasq and something like code:
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 02:37 |
|
Skinnymansbeerbelly posted:After a network upgrade yesterday, my ISP's IPv6 transport ceased entirely. I think I sussed it out, but the system has won: the prospect of trying to get past level 1 support when the internet still halfway works is do they also announce the (same or different) MTU via the DHCPv4 option? i wonder what windows and OS X do if they get such a large MTU advertisement. arguably jumbo frames are not IEEE standard Ethernet and you'd be justified in clamping it unless the sysadmin enabled some "enable jumbo frames" tunable heck i wonder what their gateways do. if their gateways get the bad advertisement from the WAN but hardcode or clamp to 1500 on the LAN that would mask the issue for like 99% of their customers
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2024 20:41 |
|
abigserve posted:There's another company out there that's been selling dodgy, inferior Cisco products for the last decade.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 07:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 22:11 |
|
quote:In a statement this week, Bryan Denny, special agent in charge of the US Department of Defense (DoD) Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service in the Western Field Office, said that Aksoy "knowingly defrauded the Department of Defense by introducing counterfeit products into its supply chain that routinely failed or did not work at all." [...] the DOD OIG weasels around the issue with their "introducing counterfeit products into [our] supply chain" statement and the ars technica writer alludes to it, but presumably the DOD is not firing up the amazon.com web retail store front and ordering a $1000 "new" "cisco" switch from the amazon marketplace delivered to an F35 base like presumably they're paying $25K to SAIC or General Dynamics or Booz Allen Hamilton or whichever huge federal IT contractor has the contract for IT services at that F35 base for that same $1K switch and presumably the DOD OIG went to those huge federal IT contractors and asked them if they knew these were counterfeit switches and their lawyers told them to say "iunno "
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 18:52 |