|
abigserve posted:I can't think of a single bad thing to say about that platform. Ah, allow me to bitch at length about the 6500/7600 BU split.
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2020 23:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 00:11 |
|
|
I suspect most organizations doing multi-cloud deployments at scale aren't paying list for ingress/egress traffic.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2021 19:04
|
|
|
Is that a mandatory requirement due to long lived flows? Resilient hashing works decently well and there's not a huge state penalty. Other more complex approaches: Facebook Shiv/Proxygen - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxhYNfFeVF4 Fastly - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_49Q_wDF0zQ
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
You should be writing your own network OS, pleb.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2021 14:08
|
|
|
They're beholden to the same Broadcom/Mellanox SDKs as everyone else.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2021 01:44
|
|
|
My comedy answer is consul
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2024 22:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 00:11 |
|
|
Without provider independent address space your options will be limited. The shape of the idea is something that determines which interface/provider to use and then DNAT based off that to keep return traffic symmetric.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2024 02:47
|
|