|
What kind of service are you running on those VIPs? This is probably better accomplished at the application layer to direct traffic to different IPs rather than this "anycast TCP" at the network layer. Your network peeps are correct to 
|
#
¿
May 13, 2021 01:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 17:34 |
|
|
my homie dhall posted:but given the reaction from everyone here perhaps asking for chashing + tolerating mass connection death might be a more rational way to go https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_distributed_computing See #1
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2021 21:44
|
|
|
ospf on servers is fine as long as the configs on the switch side are suitably defensive in case of misconfiguration. stick the servers in a stub area and put route maps on the interfaces for which prefixes the server is allowed to advertise. might be more config but multipathing is much nicer at layer 3 than layer 2 (m)lag
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2024 18:08
|
|
|
abigserve posted:Most modern enterprisey firewalls will support something like that via session-based ECMP, which should also handle NAT based on outgoing interface. I assume that sorta thing has trickled down into the prosumer market already. they call them load balancers
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2024 13:13
|
|