|
I like this Bernard Sanders fellow. As an actual member of an actual communist party in an ostensibly socialist hellhole country I would vote for Mr. Sanders in any election in my country. He's that good. Thanks.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2020 11:46 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 14:26 |
|
You couldn't make this poo poo up if you tried. By the way, this complete shitshow is international news. The biggest headline: "A great victory!... For Trump"
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2020 09:39 |
|
cargo cult posted:how popular is bernie in your country and europe at large? Bernie is the best politician the united states has ever had, my friend. I'm left of Bernie but if he ran for PM I would vote for him in a heartbeat. He's the only shot you have for scandinavian socialist utopian-ness.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2020 09:41 |
|
logger posted:Jesus Christ, I didn't do the math before but in the last year I donated $1,400 to bernie Spend more on candles
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2020 07:59 |
|
TyrantWD posted:I'm rooting for Bernie, but Bernie or Bust is worse than being a MAGA chud. RBG is staying alive out of pure spite at the moment, but she is not hanging on until November 2024. Heck, I'd go for a Bloomberg/Booker ticket if that's the alternative. Why would a republican senate confirm a dem nominated supreme court judge? Asking for a friend
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2020 17:31 |
|
Ice Phisherman posted:Hell loving yeah. It's hard to overstate just how good Bernie's M4A proposal is. Just about every reasonable examination of the economics of it reveal it to be cheaper than the current system (and historical examples bear this out) and the coverage is goddamned magical: I would prefer M4A over my current health care, and I'm goddamned norwegian. You need to elect this guy. You need to empower his movement forever and elect only people who align with Bernie.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2020 10:40 |
|
Ice Phisherman posted:Real question. How is it better than Norway's? No co-pay, includes dental and vision, half the out-of-pocket for prescription drugs. This would be a vast improvement for us, but for the US it would be about on par with what I would expect for the richest country in the world.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2020 10:53 |
|
Thlom posted:Needs to be said; co-pay in Norway is limited to like NOK 2500 a year, which is like $260, and this includes prescription drugs for chronic or long lasting sickness (and some other drugs). Antibiotics and things that you only need for a short while are not covered (but are usually not extremely expensive). Dental is mostly covered up until you are 18 (except braces and other elective procedures), vision is also covered for children (at least a bare minimum). And for adults there's some exceptions to the above. We have things to improve for sure, but it's not like we are bankrupted by medical costs (yet). Just need to kick out our current right wing government to prevent them from gutting and privatising our medical system further ... True, thanks for making the effort here. And yeah, we need to kick them the gently caress out, and also murder all boomers.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2020 11:12 |
|
Is it happening?
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2020 21:40 |
|
loving beautiful Bloomberg slipping up and admitting he "buys" politicians. https://i.imgur.com/fVIZZqM.mp4 Being that loving brazen in a televised debate, it's bizarre. Does he not know or care that people are watching?
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2020 16:06 |
|
Shere posted:I don't wanna blogpost in this thread or anything, but I'm a relatively young healthy guy and haven't had much personal experience with... needing healthcare, like beyond routine visits. I figure maybe some of you on the early side of 30 are in a similar boat. poo poo makes me sad I wish you all could have all the things I take for granted living in a modern country. Vote Bernie. Eat the rich.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2020 14:28 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:the TV rotted our brains long ago my dude, kill cable news if it ever shows up in Norway Lol
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 10:41 |
|
Yeah? I have a feeling your feeling is a pretty worthless analysis. The US of A is a failed democracy, if it ever was funtional. It's set up in such a way that a good portion of your ostensible Democrat voters in real terms are not a part of the Democratic party. An unknowable and huge portion of the electorate is straight up progressive but has no candidate to vote for. When the game is rigged, you have made the only winning move to not play. The game is rigged. Americans have Owners, not leaders. So long as you have a two-party system controlled by money and no way to take over any of the parties or make more parties, the vote and the political direction will never ever be representative. Your elected class does not have the legitimacy of democracy behind them. All you have as a nation is the tenuous contract of "the ruling class will provide bread and circuses, and you the plebs will not revolt". Well, the bread and circuses part keeps getting shittier every year due to the greed of the ruling class. Things will need to get lovely enough that a substantial portion of the portion of the population chooses revolt over apathy and despair. So yes, it makes perfect sense to not vote for the ruling class person who is promising you nothing. That's on the presidential candidate. Not the voter.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 14:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 14:26 |
|
The Dark Project posted:Explain to me exactly how not taking what little leverage you have and using it gets you into a better winning position in the future than you are in now? Outside of hypotheticals, because I see this getting bandied around a lot and I am really struggling to find a real-world example where this actually works. Did I actually claim that, tough? Even if I accepted your premise of a "better winning position", which I don't, forget game theory for a hot second. It makes perfect sense for the individual, irrational voter to not vote for someone who promises them nothing. It matters not at all if the marginal outcome for mashing the Trust button statistically helps someone on the far left, people are not game theory bots and will not behave as such. The voter only has their single vote. And you live in the real world where nobody is planning a strategic vote to get into a winning position some time in the future. If you are offered nothing, there's no reason to vote for that. And that's as far as a lot of people will be willing to reason. Not their fault, either.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 15:13 |