|
Uncle Wemus posted:Someone slap Joe's hand away and start jabbing him back. Why does he touch people? Those Secret Service bullets would kill you, but they'd also murder the Biden campaign.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2020 20:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:08 |
|
Condiv posted:https://twitter.com/LucianaLamb/status/1223588396599336963?s=20 Her "fellow woman of color, Hillary Clinton?" Yeah that's a bad look
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2020 20:43 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:that's how iowa caucus math works (the precinct is done correctly) I could instantly see that the math contradicts the instructions twice. First, they're using a form for where AT LEAST FOUR candidates are awarded, and second the rounding conventions described on the sheet are ignored. E: mb, i misread delegates on the first point moths fucked around with this message at 16:56 on Feb 4, 2020 |
# ¿ Feb 4, 2020 16:52 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:no, they follow it correctly. it's at least four DELEGATES (it elects 8). the shot cuts off the instructions on what to do if not all the delegates are awarded by the formula. (since the rounding conventions only awarded 7 out of 8 delegates, the next delegate goes to the candidate closest to earning another delegate) That's fair, I misread one for the other.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2020 16:57 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:
In the only country where this happens regularly.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2020 20:40 |
|
Xombie posted:"I swear I won't release the hostage this time" doesn't really work as a negotiating tactic when you've always released the hostage in the past. The only reason Hillary lost is because Bernie voters stayed home
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2020 18:35 |
|
Biden, presumably.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2020 14:42 |
|
spunkshui posted:I’m curious why this matters. Right to work, civil service, lovely family, or any of a thousand other reasons. Anyone whose livelihood hinges on 1) a chud authority figure or 2) maintaining an appearance of political impartiality would have reasons to not make massive public contribution.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2020 15:57 |
|
The tierra- wearer has to be an anti-Pete demonstrator, right? Right?
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2020 18:39 |
|
When called on again to address the actual question of why they're targeting black people, he dives straight into "a strategy of targeting" dangerous and violent offenders. Then he talks about dead teenagers, as if anyone else couldn't recall where his strategy leads. ete
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2020 14:13 |
|
It'll definitely come back later if he makes it to SC. He tried to answer that question with a straight-faced "because the black ones are dangerous." Which ok it was an answer, and it's probably the closest he's come to expressing what he actually thinks, but that was horrifying peek behind his mask.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2020 14:27 |
|
ManBoyChef posted:That is a really powerful force to come up against. Am I wrong to be worried? The last time the media and a party colluded against the "wrong candidate," it turbo rammed Trump into the presidency, despite several indications he didn't actually want the job.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2020 15:30 |
|
This morning MSNBC was talking about "voting blue no matter who" but was incapable of discerning who has won every contest so far, and it's all a big mystery who that "blue" will be. Maybe Bloomberg? It's just so darn hard to tell! Like, am I alone in knowing Bloomberg would basically be worse than trump because he's just palatable Trump?
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2020 16:12 |
|
Warren stuffing Bloomberg in a locker was satisfying, but then repeatedly slamming it to punctuate "How many is a few, Mike?" was pure Vince McMahon gif. His NDA skeletons really needed to be dumped on him by a woman. Anyone else going that hard on him would looking like a bully. Biden surprised me with a good performance, but his needing Sanders felt petty in the shadow of Bloomberg's bloodbath. Bringing up that he alone has met the Mexican president could have been a moment, but his timing was off. Pete trying to play himself as a middleground between the best and worst candidates was basically the tagline for his whole campaign, complete with *also I am a real Democrat. Son, you're not even a real boy. Poor Klob just wanted to go home.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2020 15:30 |
|
Hassle unlimited women. John Wick of Dogs posted:Any lawyers here? That statement in itself seems like it would be a violation of the NDAs he made them sign, and open him up to having them declared void Not a lawyer here, but he deliberately couched it in enough maybes and obfuscation that you'd be hard pressed to tell which NDA he was describing. I guess that's the advantage of being a total skeeve.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2020 15:51 |
|
Are they supposed to have signatures or no signatures? I'm not a NV voter but I've somehow heard both already.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2020 16:21 |
|
I've been mentally pronouncing it as boot the same way as tears up reads as crying or ripping paper in context. It's just shorthand with a humorous coincidence. I feel like it's a good sign for society when his supporters need to stretch this far to cite evidence of homophobia. Even ten years ago, a gay presidential candidate would have been a constant late night comedy punchline.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2020 13:54 |
|
Trump has managed to degrade trust in government and media to the point where a manufactured Russian Bernghazigate isn't going to phase anyone. It's an interesting play though, since the argument seems to rely on yelling THEY DID IT BEFORE and THAT NEVER HAPPENED simultaneously.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2020 19:48 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:I never associated the phrase with Dany, just GoT as a whole. If I in the minority with that? I'm pretty sure like half the characters use it in relation to the other half of the characters. Nobody seriously thinks Bernie will go dragon loco besides Chris Matthews
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2020 04:48 |
|
Scooter_McCabe posted:You think Bernie would let that smear attack go? His actual words were "a woman can be president in 2020 over my dead body," Warren just couldn't connect the dots.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2020 20:06 |
|
Derpies posted:NUMBER GO DOWN It's early to call this, but I fully expect Wall St to tank itself on the eve of the election to make everyone think it's Bernie's fault and everybody will instinctively blame Trump.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2020 23:20 |
|
Xombie posted:In a normal primary, the news would actually report on the leading candidate insulting a veteran over a legitimate question. This will absolutely get dug up for the general if Biden is the nominee, btw.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2020 18:02 |
|
Pick posted:Bernie himself, on Maddow, this week, said he and Warren were essentially the same on policy, so if her policies are Republican policies, his are too. Warren's stated policies are progressive. Her lovely half-measures and sandbagging are Republican af.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2020 01:20 |
|
davecrazy posted:Can somebody give me the bullet points as to why Biden is a shoe in loser to Trump? Biden has been getting a free pass because if the harmful optics of curb stomping the frail old folksy man (who was Obama's friend!) That will absolutely change if he gets the nomination. He's spent most of his career hanging targets on himself, but he's really doubled down on it this season.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 13:00 |
|
I feel like if the Good Centrist that isn't a Republican with a paintjob existed, science would have found it by now.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 14:42 |
|
It's loving amazing that Democrats still laud compromise in a world where McConnell exists.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 15:07 |
|
thewalk posted:Biden won for the shallow reasons I gave you. Absorb it. Accept it. A fake democrat president biden is still better than die hard republican trump for passing laws created by a democrat congress ... and to everybody's surprise, the real Online Tough Guys were Biden Bros all along.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 16:40 |
|
Baronash posted:Complaining about the opinions of randos on Twitter is loving stupid. That was the signature move in complaining about Bernie Bros, it's extremely fitting to see it reversed.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2020 22:12 |
|
Wicked Them Beats posted:
By November all anyone will remember is that Trump got us through this crisis. He's a blank slate upon which chuds project images of an ideal president.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2020 18:24 |
|
TyrantWD posted:I don’t know if Biden drives down turnout. Old people seem to like him enough that they turned out in large enough numbers to not only cancel out, but drive down the youth share of the vote, despite increased youth turnout in raw numbers. The olds have already done their part in voting FYGM, so if Bernie is off the ballot in November they'll have no incentive to turn out. Trump may be a crude loudmouth, but by god Sanders said Cuban literacy was good. They already know they can survive a second Trump administration, and have been assured Biden will win anyway. Once the red scare's off the table, boomers will stay home.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2020 12:21 |
|
It would also have been a lot harder to blackout Sanders if he'd been 50% of the candidates from the start.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2020 19:34 |
|
Apogee15 posted:Wishful thinking. Voters have a short memory. If they lose this election, Trump will finish his term, and 8 years of a republican president is almost always a free win for the next democratic candidate.(just like 8 years of a D president almost always results in an R president). Calling it now: Mitt Romney's 2024 run as a Democrat will be stupidly successful.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2020 04:00 |
|
Like attracts like.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2020 18:11 |
|
Trump is a loving idiot making decisions by spinning the Thunderdome wheel, but "give everybody a thousand bucks, hope for the best" isn't even an option on Biden's magic 8-ball. They're turbo-hosed come November, especially if Trump rebrands populist left.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2020 03:01 |
|
Lol if you think Biden's plan would get past a Republican Senate.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2020 03:08 |
|
Using 'Biden' and 'corruption' interchangeably is a completely understandable error.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2020 17:30 |
|
I'm very doubtful that Biden will live to see the convention. I'm somewhat skeptical that he's alive right now, tbh.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2020 20:26 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:organized to vote for a different candidate. Hillary's path to the nomination.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2020 20:30 |
|
Why is he standing in front of a green-screen photo of his study?
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2020 16:18 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:08 |
|
Lester Shy posted:This poo poo is turning me into a conspiracy theorist in real time. The only lesson the Dems got from Trump is that a loyal base will swallow, excuse, or justify anything. The problem with that video, besides the lighting, is the perspective. Nothing in the background is the correct size relative to Biden unless he's been shrunken down to 4'11" by using the Phantasm resurrection process to revivify him for this.
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2020 17:20 |