Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

Xander77 posted:

I don't know that political scientists in the US are into, but my professors were weirdly horny for the STV system.

Stv only applies to elections where you are electing more than one person. In the case of a caucus where you only transfer the votes of the non viable candidates, stv works the same way as ranked choice.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

reignonyourparade posted:

A caucus does elect more than one person though. Each location is picking multiple county level delegates with some exceptions.

But they are not voting for delegates, they are voting for presidential delegates.

To clarify: stv transfers excess votes and votes from unviable candidates.

So let's say you are voting for 5 seats in a council and there are 100 voters. So it's 20 votes per seat. So first thing you do is transfer the votes of everyone who got MORE than 20 votes to their second option. After you get through all the excess votes, you start to eliminate all those who are last, until you get 5 candidates with exactly 20 votes.

In a caucus you don't do the first part, because the excess votes matter. I.e., you get 35 votes you keep those. In a caucus you only do the "transfer from those below viability" part. I.e., the same as ranked choice.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply