Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014


So I looked up the mod.

quote:

its a strange mod alright

I've spent easily +200 hours with that mod.....and i still don't know why i enjoy it so much...

the perk system is great you get better and better for the higher levels.

I also have a backup of Devourment v0.65c if that is of any use....

i remember trying that newer one that lets you move weight from your breasts,rear end and belly........it was very buggy... :/ ....very....buggy....i nearly went insane looking for an older version things.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/bestofnextdoor/status/1244814183373262848?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Six-Of-Hearts posted:

Selfcare is not reading the replies to this.

On the other hand:

https://twitter.com/MtBlueyes/status/1245035585221214208

The new "are troops."

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/4evernevertrump/status/1245122596724563968?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014


You know what, we really don't need to hear the next two arguments.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/coolp1np/status/1245305470333497344

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

hyperhazard posted:

"Unfairness," like you can just talk to the virus' manager and get them to change its policy.

Today I had to tell a customer that we can't give an estimate for when testing will resume because the pandemic has closed virtually all of our testing sites, and she asked if there was anyone else she could speak to. I recommend God.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

there wolf posted:

A slab of beer? Also sounds like he needs to be more thrifty and start making bathtub gin like our grandparent's generation.

The actual limit is:

* 2 cases of 24 beers or pre-mixed drinks each
* 12 bottles of wine
* 2 bottles of spirits

Two categories at a time, per person per day. The only way that'll be a problem for you is if you're literally drinking two bottles of whiskey a day, every day.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

From a friend using POF:


chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

blast0rama posted:

No, the real OJ Simpson is @TheRealOJ32.

At least based on follower counts, as neither has a drat check mark.

Guy has a problem with getting legally verified as what he actually is.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014


I found that way too fast.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

christmas boots posted:

I know it's not the main thrust of the article but I'd be interested in seeing a source for the Jolly Roger being used primarily by privateers. I was under the impression that pirates flew it specifically to distinguish themselves from privateers and government ships--as the latter were expected to show quarter to surrendering enemies even if they had been resisting and pirates very much were not--so you'd better just be safe and just hand over your poo poo right from the start.

It's not correct. Privateers were generally required to fly a variant of their hiring nation's flag, which would distinguish them from naval vessels but also indicate that they weren't just regular pirates. Many of these privateers turned to piracy after the wars settled down and their services were no longer required, and the skull/skeleton on a black or red background spread rapidly over the years. I would also be very hesitant to call privateers a "loose paramilitary organization."

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Okay, short version of how that comic is wrong:

Privateers are basically mercenaries. They're given a letter of marque that puts them legally in the employ of a particular government, giving them permission to attack and plunder vessels of an enemy nation. The letter would indicate exactly what they were and weren't allowed to do and they generally had to follow laws and treaties to avoid getting in trouble with the admiralty court. They had to return captured vessels to get prize money or have the vessel legally transferred to their ownership. You would actually want to fly distinctive colors and keep your letter of marque on hand to avoid accusations of piracy, because that was a capital crime.

Pirates don't have a letter of marque and generally attack whoever. They may sail under false colors or pretend to have a letter of marque for deception, but they're operating illegally. Privateering is legal, piracy is not. The famous age of piracy with captains like Blackbeard, Black Bart, and Anne Bonny began when the War of Spanish Succession ended in 1714 and a ton of privateers ended up out of a job and not really knowing what to do except keep robbing ships. Triangle Trade became a huge thing at that time as well, which led to a rich field of potential prizes for anyone willing to become a pirate. The only way you could ever call privateers and pirates a "loose paramilitary organization" is if you take into account that they generally didn't attack each other and made attempts at alliances and even forming a free state at Nassau.

Funny enough, Assassin's Creed IV is actually a reasonably accurate depiction of this era and the relationships between the pirates for the time (obviously accounting for the fictional aspects). Stede Bonnet wasn't quite as silly and tubby as he is in the game, but he was just a wealthy landowner who got bored and annoyed with his wife and decided to commission a ship and become a pirate for the fun of it. It lasted up until he got hanged.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Memento posted:

I thought it was a Webley but the area around the top of the yoke doesn't look right.

Yes, it's a Webley. The bore size suggests .455, which was last produced in 1923. Assuming it's not an air gun replica, I wouldn't want to shoot a gun in that condition.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/liveluv707/status/1246195558282395648

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/llw902/status/1246185102796881922?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/hilaryagro/status/1246474433188876288?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/a_n_k_u_r/status/1246441208122970119?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Arivia posted:

oh for gently caress's sake naomi wolf? you too?

e: nevermind I'm getting her confused with naomi klein, who is less stupid overall. beauty myth can still be good with 5g being way out of her area of study, but that would be a big bummer if naomi klein was that stupid.

Yeah, Naomi Wolf is the one who said gay people were regularly executed in Victorian England and turned out to have been badly misinterpreting a legal term that actually meant "Would have been sentenced to death but was actually released", and also picked as her homosexual martyr a guy who raped a small child.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014



I checked his page and yes, he’s just an open Nazi.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Jim

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/brghid/status/1247627779471884288

Dumbass trying to get Twitter popular accidentally gets caught tweeting to herself to create a fake conversation.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014


He somehow doesn't know when to stop:

https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/1247731535220027393

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Jamie Faith posted:

https://twitter.com/anarchomastia/status/1248008379756249088

"in Europe loving in front of your family and kids is very normal you stupid prude!"

The only place I've seen anyone unironically say this about medieval life is A World Lit Only by Fire, which is one of the worst and least accurate pop history books in the world but has unfortunately colored a lot of popular medieval history "knowledge" because it ended up assigned reading in a lot of college courses. Other claims include

* Medieval peasants had no sense of time and never went much further than their home village, which could lead to them becoming hopelessly lost if they ever left town.

* The focus on religion removed the medieval man's sense of self as an individual human, causing them to frolic naked in the summer due to having no shame.

* Cannibalism was a regular occurrence, as was poverty so great that you were left naked in an empty hut any time you had a bad year from selling everything you owned.

So basically the medieval countryside was just full of roving bands of nude cannibals. It also had one point where he took a medieval joke about a peasant fainting at the smell of perfume in a city and needing to be revived by waving a shovel of dung under his nose as actual fact that he repeated.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Badger of Basra posted:

I’m in for the first quarter of these two tweets, since “it’s fine if they want to do whatever in private but they shouldn’t flaunt it so much” is a bad take but I think she’s overcorrected

https://twitter.com/anarchomastia/status/1248008650850885632

Just a tad.

For the record, she's also wrong. People at least put a curtain up and tried to stay quiet. Loudly loving your wife in front of your kids was considered as much of a faux pas as it is today.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Dr Christmas posted:

So they chose a lens suitable to the lighting and subject, and that’s bad?

According to NDT, the only acceptable post is one that’s technically correct in every fact and makes sure to clarify the complete details of any action you took to ensure scientific replicability.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014


Admitting to being a rapist to own the leftists.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Strom Cuzewon posted:

Isn't this just an admission of Scorsese's complaint that superhero movies are theme parks rather than cinema? Like, the whole point of a popcorn blockbuster is for those woop-moments, he's just dressing it up in fancy/classics 101 allusions.

He’s technically right. Shakespeare’s works were mass market plays with crude humor that often had a contemporary political bent to please wealthy patrons and the nobility. The only real difference from modern blockbusters in intent is the language used.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

hawowanlawow posted:

yea and calling a comic book movie a film is like calling a big mac a dish

quote:

Film, also called movie or motion picture

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

hawowanlawow posted:

yes they are two words that mean the same thing with different connotations, that is the point

They don't have different connotations. They're the same thing.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

vyelkin posted:

Do you mean the guy who took a photo with a BMW at a dealership and then claimed that he was rich and popular because he never saw Star Wars?

https://twitter.com/OfWudan/status/1116767056592904193

https://twitter.com/OfWudan/status/1116798621238927360

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Arivia posted:

Not specifically in Shakespeare but you do see references like that in other literature and it only gets stronger heading into the Victorians. If I remember my Chaucer correctly he drops a couple favourite inns during the Canterbury Tales.

Again: all our literature really is just dime novels, it’s just OLD dime novels so it feels more important.

There's a specific namedrop by Falstaff of Tewkesbury mustard, which was a popular variety at the time. The plays are full of what are basically Elizabethan pop culture references.

I had to cut down Romeo & Juliet to 1 hour for a show I did last year, and I decided to start with the entire unabridged script and go from there. There's a fuckton of useless stuff that gets cut out in most productions, including at least one wacky comedy scene with a band that's thrown into the middle of the climax right before Juliet is found "dead."

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/alexiakelley/status/1247587270204575744?s=21


All you soyboys who think Mexicans are people

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Looking at a bunch of movies that are enjoyed by the majority and make a ton of money and going "Actually they all suck" is just a guarded way of saying that you think you're better than most people.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1248096728881991681

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/jennyenicholson/status/1249017135260524544?s=21

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

https://twitter.com/erenyeagershill/status/1249142633345306624?s=21

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply