Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
iammeandsoareyou
Oct 27, 2007
Nothing to see here
I can't speak to the Sony, but Fuji is definitely not a terrible choice. The film simulations are actually pretty good and aren't gimmicky, or at least I don't think they are. I generally shoot .jpg+Raw when I am using my Fuji and I find most of the time, the only post processing I do is cropping the .jpg, with the Raw just collecting digital dust on my hard drive. Of course if the film simulation preset options aren't to your taste, then you're back to post work. When I do post-processing on the Fuji RAW (.raf files) i use Lightroom and have never had an issue but lots of people who use Fuji, use Capture One, because they feel it plays better with .raf files. If software choice is a concern for you, this guy goes through the different software options for Fuji (XT-3 but would be still be .raf files) and you can decide if that would be a deal breaker for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPtPxH4IpsM

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply