|
Oh Snapple! posted:If anything "endangers" c-spam it's the climate where you can insult a mod in one of the busiest megathreads here and then this apparently sends up a loving signal for several who have nothing to loving do with this forum to show up. what does this post mean? explain it more, please
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
also move all site-wide election discussion, trump, biden, whoever into cspam
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:37
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:what does this post mean? explain it more, please, because its unclear what you mean same, except w/r/r your statement that “ someone(s) with influence wants to see us destroyed, ”
|
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:If anything "endangers" c-spam it's the climate where you can insult a mod in one of the busiest megathreads here and then this apparently sends up a loving signal for several who have nothing to loving do with this forum to show up.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:also move all site-wide election discussion, trump, biden, whoever into cspam do this and also rename it to Your Candidate Sucks again, which will be true for both mainstream candidates
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:what does this post mean? explain it more, please, because its unclear what you mean it's super loving silly and imo unhealthy that insulting fluffdaddy attracted several mods who have nothing to do with cspam typically
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:also move all site-wide election discussion, trump, biden, whoever into cspam it's clearly too much for the weary d&d mods, so exhausted they have to close threads because reading reports is hard, to handle only c-spam can take this burden
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:39
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:it's super loving silly and imo unhealthy that insulting fluffdaddy attracted several mods who have nothing to do with cspam typically IMO...well. It's good people called them out for lying.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:39
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:it's super loving silly and imo unhealthy that insulting fluffdaddy attracted several mods who have nothing to do with cspam typically ok, thanks, gotcha. i completely agree
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:39
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:also move all site-wide election discussion, trump, biden, whoever into cspam this might be good for photoshops. we've had a drought of photoshops since al! and mpb left and drygoods was eaten by turdfuzz
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:39
|
|
|
Ibram Gaunt posted:IMO...well. It's good people called them out for lying. no one lied about poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:it's super loving silly and imo unhealthy that insulting fluffdaddy attracted several mods who have nothing to do with cspam typically It is however very healthy to then call them transphobes without evidence and then use slurs to denigrate them.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:also we're under orders from lowtax to reign it in! he's the sole proprietor and ruling god of this domain, and while often absent he can return with a smighty vengeance. my hands are tied! sounds real lame
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
one day nyc_tattoo will have his vengeance and all you haters will see
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:do this and also rename it to Your Candidate Sucks again, which will be true for both mainstream candidates https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC1oURSaYoQ
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
Sharkopath posted:It is however very healthy to then call them transphobes without evidence and then use slurs to denigrate them. I'm glad that this forum - the last bastion of true leftist thought on the net thinks thats cool to do.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:41
|
|
|
Trumps Baby Hands posted:same, except w/r/r your statement that “ someone(s) with influence wants to see us destroyed, ” i'll help clarify if i were to say "let's make the most popular forum with the most popular thread a top level forum since its been around for 5 years and has its own unique culture and ideology" then who says "no?" that's who i'm talking about
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:41
|
|
|
Think this thread is getting a little "uppity"
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:42
|
|
|
Sharkopath posted:It is however very healthy to then call them transphobes without evidence and then use slurs to denigrate them. maybe agreeing to kick the "problematic" trans posters out of your forum in exchange for a mod star earns derision. tho i see we're back to making poo poo up about those same posters denigrating him with slurs.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:42
|
|
|
Sharkopath posted:It is however very healthy to then call them transphobes without evidence and then use slurs to denigrate them. Who used a slur?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:43
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:i'll help clarify to fully represent its goals, interests, and sphere of influence, it should be a sub of the podcast forum.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:43
|
|
|
oxsnard posted:Who used a slur? You did.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:44
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:cspam not being top-level has absolutely zero impact on its likelihood of being deleted, get a grip 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:44
|
|
|
Endorph posted:i agree that c-spam should not be a sub of the politics forum. imho we should be the top forum above TCC
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:44
|
|
|
Endorph posted:i agree that c-spam should not be a sub of the politics forum. Do not do this to Rapidly Going Deaf. It's uncalled for.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:45
|
|
|
oxsnard posted:A mod posted this. In CSPAM This seems like a good and correct post? Also I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to call someone the f word anywhere on these forums. Somebody has issued a correction as of 13:14 on May 27, 2020 |
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:45
|
|
|
all other forums should be subforums of cspam. its central planning
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:48
|
|
|
being made top level would be a sign of acceptance by the moderation team and demonstrate that there is a place for us here if they're unwilling to do that, how is that not a demonstration of the exact opposite: that they're just waiting for us to either go away organically or become so marginalized that we can simply be done away with without too much fuss
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:48
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:being made top level would be a sign of acceptance by the moderation team and demonstrate that there is a place for us here i don't think being made top-level would do anything besides piss off the qcs gremlins, and that's not really a high bar to clear
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:49
|
|
|
Though I have noticed this site is trending harder towards spite posting where people are bronging stuff up to settle grudges. it’s kind of made QCS kind of unreadable and just a useless forum. ironically I think it’s the forum that does need tighter moderation because it does serve a purpose. just right now it doesn’t
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:49
|
|
|
i dont want to be top lvel. ive excelled at too much in life. i just want a dark corner to laugh at the succ in peace
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:50
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:i don't think being made top-level would do anything besides piss off the qcs gremlins, and that's not really a high bar to clear sure it would, just tell them "they have their own space, leave them alone"
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:51
|
|
|
Son of Thunderbeast posted:I'm still absolutely loving gobsmacked that someone PMing other posters for a list of bad posters, and this same user definitely proving they've got--at minimum--a list of posters with the number of rap sheet entries, was deemed totally fine and unnecessary to act on, not just by you, but by several mods. This was a few pages ago, but +1 all the way. The most damning part was said poster immediately making GBS threads out a new thread to attack his forum enemies. If anything, allowing someone to build a list, have said list revealed, and then not punishing those actions encouraged him to escalate into trying to get people banned in QCS. The next step he takes is going to be even shittier, and the mods official position is "well, we can't do anything" is going to look terrible in hindsight.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
a user in the "succzone" thread today admitted to being in a position to fire and firing multiple employees who behaved like sa mods. i think as a community we should investigate whether these were good socialist firings or bad capitalist firings.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:being made top level would be a sign of acceptance by the moderation team and demonstrate that there is a place for us here 'become so marginalized?' its an internet forum not an axis of power
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
getting qcs deleted would certainly be cspam's most glorious victory to date after that we might even take on pet island
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
Endorph posted:'become so marginalized?' its an internet forum not an axis of power its a community
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:53
|
|
|
WorkerThread posted:sounds real lame It really sounds like a dogshit job, especially these days. Like, even the people who get scammed into doing elaborate projects for 'exposure' occasionally get Chili's gift cards.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
I always thought posting about other posters was discouraged. Seems like that rule should be brought back rather than doing a politicalstyle purge on an internet comedy forum
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
Also, the draconian punishments in QCS make open discussion nearly impossible. It keeps thing clean, yes, but frankly I do not feel comfortable posting in that forum at all because of some of the ridiculously overblown sentencing. FFS, this comment got a guy a month. Like, I'm sorry he annoyed some mods, but loving Christ. What message does that send to people with legitimate concerns?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 02:58
|
|