Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

r u ready to WALK posted:

the most fascinating thing about compilers is compiling a compiler

https://wiki.osdev.org/Building_GCC#Introduction

I guess the initial versions of GCC were compiled with some ancient unix C compiler and from there you could use your current version of gcc to build a slightly better gcc as time went by.

I wonder if gcc compiling gcc always gives the exact same result regardless of what compiler made the parent

you link the answer to that question; bootstrapping gcc indeed does build gcc again with the final compiler just to verify that the output is identical (which is important since the original compiler may be so broken that the stage 1 gcc is broken, and produces a broken stage 2 gcc and so on).

it wasn't that long ago gcc could still be bootstrapped with any old k&r compiler (up to 4.something i think), but since they've switched to developing gcc in c++ requirements are now pretty high.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply