Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon

spacemang_spliff posted:

It's wrong to hide from your just desserts?

:hai:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tinestram
Jan 13, 2006

Excalibur? More like "Needle"

Grimey Drawer
The bad algorithm defender has logged on (it's me, I'm the technogoon). While there are plenty of great examples of racism in ML and racist algorithms, I don't feel like Twitter's image cropping algorithm is a good example of this.

In the case of the Obama/McConnell images, can you, as a critic of how the algorithm selected McConnell in both cases, articulate which face *should* have been selected in each case? Should it have been the top one or the bottom one? What if the images were oriented left/right instead? If you're an English speaker, you might say the left one should be selected, but if you're Japanese, you might say the right. Would either of you be "correct"?

Some people rightfully pointed out that the images could be modified in relatively small ways to reverse the selection:

https://twitter.com/SergioSemJ/status/1307493041742254080

Or large changes in unaltered images could reverse the selection as well:

https://twitter.com/BySaadGhamdi/status/1307661970750009344

I'm not trying to minimize the impact of bad algorithms. Quite the opposite: I "deleted"* my FB account when it came to light that FB allowed ads targeted to users who had an interest in "white genocide", which quite clearly leads to further marginalization of vulnerable groups, and FB just fuckin shrugged and was like "whaddya gonna do? It's da algorithms!" I also don't want to downplay how algorithms, even in a relatively low-impact scenario as this, can shape human discourse. If it was a case of individual images of faces and McConnell was identified as a face and Obama wasn't, I would absolutely agree that the algorithm desperately needed work. In this case though? I don't know about you, but as I can't really say how a single face should be selected out of several faces, I don't feel I have grounds to criticize what actual selections are being made.

*nothing on FB is ever truly deleted

Algund Eenboom
May 4, 2014


Lol

Dustcat
Jan 26, 2019

StashAugustine posted:

i think im now mentally prepared that if i don't get a job when i graduate i can just become the unabomber

are you gonna mail pipe bombs to random cows

fanfic insert
Nov 4, 2009
All watched over by machines of lovely whiteness

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
now that I understand the joke, the same post with Justin Trudeau is extremely funny.

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle

I can't stop laughing at this

I remembered it while driving and started laughing

shyduck
Oct 3, 2003


https://twitter.com/nopinkspandex/status/1309982262973394944?s=21

very good

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Spaced God posted:

As someone who works extensively with ~the algorithm~ and someone who is fortunate enough to work with some pretty cool folks in my current gig, I had a chat about this kinda stuff a while ago. One of the points I found interesting is that a really easy and really big way to shift the narrative from "the beep boop computer decided that black people are inferior" is to tear down the concept of ~the algorithm~ entirely during explanations and instead shift the phrasing to "the people who programmed this." It sort of takes the passive self-determination of the computer out of it.

Of course, the status quo is in place for a reason so it's hard to actually start that shift in thinking. But, food for thought.

coming from a background in the ~~humanities~~ before studying computer-fu, it is fascinating how hermetic the discipline is in regards to such things

like, for example, the basic brickheaded attitude found even in design and analysis about sitting next to the person who you are going to develop a system for to make their work easier, and letting them tell you what are the problems and what could make it better, then the coder goes "pffft I know better" and makes a very good piece of software that works well but delivers very little in the actual intended purpose, and a lot of people don't get it

(I had a colleague realizing that problem while working at a credit services software systems and he went loving ballistic - he figured out that his code, his labor, was helping people getting in debt and he left asap)

Gods_Butthole
Aug 9, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Congratulations, you might just be the next pussy-recognizer goon. Call your local porn empire and ask them if they need someone to identify all the performers in their archive footage.

A job I was destined for.

bvj191jgl7bBsqF5m
Apr 16, 2017

Í̝̰ ͓̯̖̫̹̯̤A҉m̺̩͝ ͇̬A̡̮̞̠͚͉̱̫ K̶e͓ǵ.̻̱̪͖̹̟̕

SubnormalityStairs posted:

The bad algorithm defender has logged on (it's me, I'm the technogoon). While there are plenty of great examples of racism in ML and racist algorithms, I don't feel like Twitter's image cropping algorithm is a good example of this.

Well that's just dumb

Pf. Hikikomoriarty
Feb 15, 2003

RO YNSHO


Slippery Tilde

StashAugustine posted:

butlerian jihad now

little munchkin
Aug 15, 2010

lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Deep Dish Fuckfest
Sep 6, 2006

Advanced
Computer Touching


Toilet Rascal
i programmed my computer to tell me if it's racist and it said no. case closed

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply