Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
King Hong Kong
Nov 6, 2009

For we'll fight with a vim
that is dead sure to win.

wandler20 posted:

I feel bad piling on the Jets at this point but as long as Gase is employed they deserve it.

https://twitter.com/Jason_OTC/status/1318921018761793537?s=20

Seahawks and Titans, noted bad teams this year. How hard is it to describe a chart correctly?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

King Hong Kong
Nov 6, 2009

For we'll fight with a vim
that is dead sure to win.

SKULL.GIF posted:

The chart lists these two teams as very slightly below average on defense, chill.

Read his description.

King Hong Kong
Nov 6, 2009

For we'll fight with a vim
that is dead sure to win.

SKULL.GIF posted:

Why, when I could just read the chart? Can you read charts?

Yes, obviously, which is why I said he did it incorrectly. Did you tweet this or something?

King Hong Kong
Nov 6, 2009

For we'll fight with a vim
that is dead sure to win.

Kalli posted:

Which is also being rather kind to their defenses if anything.

The Titans have allowed 14 TD's on 16 red zone trips this year, which is the only reason that intentional penalty made any sense by them on Sunday.

And the offenses they played aren't exactly a murderer's row: Texans, Bills, Vikings, Jaguars, Broncos.

Yeah, honestly I expected the Seahawks’ defense to come out much worse.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply