Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CarForumPoster
Jun 26, 2013

⚡POWER⚡

KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

Moana is very correct in terms of approach and framing.

There is significant bias in most organizations, especially highly technical organizations, regarding managers without a bachelor's degree. Have you considered trying to complete a degree? It is quite possible that even if you successfully advocate as Moana suggests that you will not be considered qualified for the role that they develop.

Agree with KGJ and Moana on framing

Re: You must have a degree.
The only exception to the "manager titles MUST have degrees" in aerospace that I've witnessed is in a manufacturing environment where the manager's direct reports are all technicians. An example that comes to mind is a ~120 person aerospace assembly subcontractor that has machinists, machinist "leads" who are usually the most knowledgeable person about a particular type of machining, and all of those will report to managers who often used to be machinists/machinist leads. I think this is rscott's environment, but completely agree that there's still an aversion to this and they never make it to director, to be sure.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CarForumPoster
Jun 26, 2013

⚡POWER⚡

KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

Agreed, in a true production environment you have a shot, but it sounded to me like rscott was backoffice and not shop floor, which is tougher. You know aero better than I, though. It also sounds like rscott is looking for broad responsibilities rather than the route of "I am the God of [specific process/task] so therefore I manage everyone on [specific process/task] and don't do anything else"

Yea good point

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply