|
I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 14:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 23:23 |
|
|
laws arent real, they exist in the mind
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 14:20
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong lol if u think "moderate" doesn't mean "remove leftists, keep nazis" Trump is even explicit that that is exactly the goal
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:08
|
|
|
itd either kill social networks outright or have no effect other than make posting pig poop balls a federal crime
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:14
|
|
|
doesn't sa fall under the same umbrella? they'd probably have to close the fyad-likes
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:43
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong the same reason why a nation-wide mask mandate is bad. it's impossible to enforce which will lead to selective enforcement, which means the enforcers get to decide who lives and who dies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:45
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong are you ready to moderate content 
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:50
|
|
|
human garbage bag posted:the same reason why a nation-wide mask mandate is bad. it's impossible to enforce which will lead to selective enforcement, which means the enforcers get to decide who lives and who dies. Facebook, Google, and Twitter are doing this now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 00:57
|
|
|
i think nothing will happen relly to big sites but little forums like ours will get epically pwned but idk
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:02
|
|
|
nothing will happen that is good. but, if something could happen that is bad,
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:04
|
|
|
you should be for repealing section 230 simply because 2000 bucks will make a bigger positive impact on people's lives and their immediate conditions than being free to poo poo post on the internet. people who argue otherwise havei nhaled too much rhetoric on freedom of speech on the internet and all that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:06
|
|
|
while $2000 may indeed have greater impact on "material" needs in the immediate short term, the longer term spiritual benefit of poo poo posting on the internet for many years to come must certainly be weighed
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:11
|
|
|
i think we can all straightforwardly agree that everyone on this forum doesn't use the internet, doesn't need the internet, and doesn't care about the internet
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:16
|
|
|
HAMAS HATE BOAT posted:while $2000 may indeed have greater impact on "material" needs in the immediate short term, the longer term spiritual benefit of poo poo posting on the internet for many years to come must certainly be weighed
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:22
|
|
|
I don’t think they’d come for the shitposts. I think they’d come for the videos documenting police violence, and the people calling out their employer’s lovely practices, and anything else that challenges power and can be silenced by a SLAPP suit
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:27
|
|
|
Victory Position posted:are you ready to moderate content Post in gbs and link it
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 01:43
|
|
|
Smythe posted:i think nothing will happen relly to big sites but little forums like ours will get epically pwned but idk this is my suspicion too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 03:05
|
|
|
couldnt people just move their poo poo to canadia or w/e
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 03:30
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong you're a moderator, OP. do you want to be deposed because a goon sued jeffrey because i called them a lib and wasn't probed or banned? even when they insist they aren't a lib but clearly are?
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 03:58
|
|
|
i would totally sell my account for 2k
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 04:08
|
|
|
let chaos reign
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 05:28
|
|
|
Eat This Glob posted:you're a moderator, OP. do you want to be deposed because a goon sued jeffrey because i called them a lib and wasn't probed or banned? even when they insist they aren't a lib but clearly are? I would absolutely ban taintrunner if I saw him post in gbs
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 10:47
|
|
|
been thinking about this and mayube logging off could be good? like de atomize people? but realistically something like this would leave fb and the likes intact. a community like ours might be small enough to fall through the cracks?? no idea how it would play out tho im not a computer goon
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 10:51
|
|
|
T-man posted:doesn't sa fall under the same umbrella? they'd probably have to close the fyad-likes lol c-spam would be the first to go qcs would absolutely send the FBI all the posts that they claimed would get the site shut down and then nothing happened
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 12:56
|
|
|
i don't think they would care about some thing awful
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 13:09
|
|
|
I think it'd be great to nuke twitter/facebook/etc, however since this is the shabbiest reality probably the only forum it was enforced on would be cspam (small, smells bad, jeffreys bitcoin millions aren't enough to buy off politicians)
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 13:35
|
|
|
laws in their purest form are an epiphenomena of posting, if u really think about it
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 13:38
|
|
|
It will be good when all human communication is strongly moderated by companies and user created content is a legal liability only a giant media company can afford to barely provide. as a leftist I support this because I have somehow decided this will only apply to my enemies for some reason.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 14:46
|
|
|
they are already moderating* their content OP *censoring
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 17:27
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong It would single-handedly destroy the internet, OP. Imagine if you could sue verizon because someone talked about buying weed on the phone. Wait, sorry, I just argued myself in to agreeing with you. Do it, OP.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 17:39
|
|
|
I submit "Lol, guillotine jeff bozo" to the disney supersite. 8 hours later I get a rejection notice back. This is a victory for leftism because it briefly reduced facebook's stock by 1% for a week before raising it immeasurably.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 17:53
|
|
|
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230/infographic its really loving bad, op. nobody should want more corporate control of speech online Syncopation has issued a correction as of 18:06 on Jan 3, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 18:02
|
|
|
The eff is a bought out corporate tech lobby lol I would take their whinging with some salt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 18:59
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong Why moderate it? Let it spill over into the schools and churches, let the takes pile up in the streets. In the end, they'll beg us to  .
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 20:55
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong Rather than fighting a lawsuit, sites will start taking down anything that gets a suit filed against them (or that they think will). Guess which political orientation has more money to file lawsuits with, OP. Let's put it this way. The Jehovah's Witnesses have a long history of suing anybody that makes a name for themselves posting anything disparaging about them. Now instead of going through the process of getting a subpoena to get the identity of the user, who gets to make their case anonymously at first, to sue them, they could just sue Youtube and Youtube would take the content down rather than dealing with the lawsuit. It's basically making it so that hate groups and cults and political groups can shut down content with their wallets. As it is now 95% of the time Youtube gets to say "Section 230, now let me go back to counting the money these views are getting me."
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 21:44
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It will be good when all human communication is strongly moderated by companies and user created content is a legal liability only a giant media company can afford to barely provide. as a leftist I support this because I have somehow decided this will only apply to my enemies for some reason.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 21:46
|
|
|
it would be prohibitively expensive to have any site with user-generated content. think of how much time goes into creating that content. now you have to have someone who reads that content, which takes about the same amount of time. also by making all content pre-moderated instead of post-moderated, you'd end up with your post sitting in limbo for a while even if it did happen, which would slow down the dopamine rush of using all these stupid apps, which greatly diminish their userbase. it pretty much kills social media by making it too expensive to run.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 21:49
|
|
|
Jose posted:I'm a huge loving moron but it seems to me this would be good because it would force facebook and twitter to actually moderate its content. why am i wrong do you remember when the internet was just static pages with no way to interact with them? that's what getting rid of 230 does, it sends us tumbling back into that abyss instead of moderating content (and risking getting sued) websites will just disable all user-generated content, forever
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 21:51
|
|
|
T-man posted:doesn't sa fall under the same umbrella? they'd probably have to close the fyad-likes they'd have to kill sa as well, guarantee one of the offsites would sue Korean Boomhauer posted:couldnt people just move their poo poo to canadia or w/e as hosed up as the united states is we have the strongest freedom of speech laws in the world
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 21:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 23:23 |
|
|
Relevant Tangent posted:do you remember when the internet was just static pages with no way to interact with them? It's not even like it'd reset things to the 90s. All the dragon ball Z sites on GeoCities could exist because GeoCities was legally shielded from what the users made. Like everyone is all stuck on "hehehe social media, ssuck it! heheheheh" but it's not like it's just going to close facebook and end all the enemy posters or something, it's transforming the internet to cable tv where you have a couple big companies that release content then you read the content.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 23:10
|
|