- Dante
- Feb 8, 2003
-
|
This has always struck me as an interesting, but also a relatively straightforward, ethical question where everyone more or less has the same answer. At some point the benefits of enjoying the art outweighs the moral cost of somewhat contributing to a bad person/companys profits. If they're dead it's pretty much a non-issue, I don't think viewing a Picasso painting or reading a Hamsun novel gives any meaningful support to misogyny or nazism. There's a subset of this discussion where a small group of people don't want to engage with art or content produced by people with different values or voting records at all. That I don't think is an ethical standpoint as much as weirdly cultish and feels somewhat identical to the idea of "christian" bookstores etc.
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2021 17:09
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2024 05:37
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2021 17:09
