Posting and discussing sources: a D&D feedback thread

Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Posting and discussing sources: a D&D feedback thread

Mooseontheloose: May 13, 2003

Can we have some sort of rule on a tweet that goes like this:

Tweet: Nancy Pelosi completely abandons AOC, embraces fascist right, link to article:
Article Reads: Nancy Pelosi has not commented on AOC's bill filed last night but talks are ongoing with her staff.

Like if we can point out in all the ways the Tweet is misleading with even a cursory search and read, people should eat a probation.

# ¿ Jan 31, 2021 18:52

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 12, 2024 02:30

Mooseontheloose: May 13, 2003

Herstory Begins Now posted:

That aside, I'm very curious what people feel is a reasonable consequence for people misrepresenting what they post/reposting some misleading, outragey twitter bait or similar?

And on that note, I'm gathering generally that most people want to return to the previous standard of articles getting posted with a short paragraph of framing and preferably also an extract of particularly relevant points?

12 Hour Probation. Ramp if it becomes an ongoing problem for a poster.

# ¿ Feb 1, 2021 01:38

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Posting and discussing sources: a D&D feedback thread