|
DoomTrainPhD posted:Other than: There’s no evidence that a complaint was ever filed. No record of it has ever been produced, and Reade’s account of how she made the complaint, and to where, has changed over time. Mainstream outlets largely stopped covering the story after Politico reported that Reade appears to have committed perjury as an expert witness.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 22:22 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 11:09 |
|
DoomTrainPhD posted:The records are sealed iirc The complaint, would not be in Biden’s sealed staff papers. The complaint would be to the Senate’s personnel office, not Biden’s office, for obvious reasons. A Senator’s papers do not contain records of personnel complaints, as the papers are accessible by the Senator.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 22:36 |
|
Malleum posted:ive never actually seen any evidence that somehow proves, one way or the other, that she definitely did or did not graduate before going to law school, ignoring how completely inconsequential that is regardless, so if you have any you should post it itt Antioch University officials state categorically that she did not graduate. "Politico posted:Karen Hamilton, a spokeswoman for Antioch University, said in a statement that Reade did not graduate and was never a faculty member. Reade attended Antioch for three academic quarters, in 2000 and part of 2001, the university said.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 22:50 |
|
Freakazoid_ posted:There was also that time her mom called into the larry king show on August 11th 1993 giving a strong hint it happened. That really sealed it for me. In that video, Reade’s mother states that Reade had had “problems” while working at Biden’s office, but didn’t want to speak out for fear of harming Biden’s reputation. It’s not particularly consistent with the 2020 allegations. Reade’s former coworker, when interviewed, told reporters that Reade had had difficulties with her work as a staffer. Reade’s account of the assault does not match up with the geography of the capital building. quote:Reade says the alleged assault took place while she was delivering a gym bag to Biden along the indoor route between his office and the Capitol. Her lawyer specified to NewsHour that it happened “in a semiprivate area like an alcove” located “somewhere between the Russell [building] and/or Capitol building.” Reade previously described the assault taking place in a “side area.”
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 22:59 |
|
Lemming posted:There are a bunch of accounts of her talking about it contemporaneously when it happened, as well as her mother calling in, and various other staffers who worked with her at the time said they also believe it happened. Do you have any links? I’ve never seen any corroboration from fellow staffers. One issue with relying on corroboration from friends is that in some cases, the stories have changed: quote:
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:10 |
|
Gods_Butthole posted:The way memory and trauma work together, especially over decades is well understood to be murky and fluid. We went over this whole thing with the Blassie Ford testimony. Were you willing to over look inconsistencies in Ford's telling of events? If so, why are you unwilling to do the same for Reid? One problem here is that corroborating witnesses only ever seem to remember hearing about the assault at the time after Reade discussed it decades later. Salon posted:It is also worth noting that Reade’s strongest corroborating witness at the time it was reported appeared to be her former neighbor Lynda LaCasse, who seemed to offer independent, near-contemporaneous corroboration of the full assault claim on the record in her conversations with Business Insider. Unfortunately, that piece failed to include in its initial roundup one key detail that was published alongside the article in an interview transcript that was behind a paywall: LaCasse only remembered her conversation with Reade after she was reminded of it during a phone call with Reade.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:16 |
|
Lemming posted:I linked the relevant section in another post where NYT reporters asked some of the other women who accused Biden and clearly stated that some of them also believed her account: Again, it’s not only that Reade’s memory regarding the assault itself changed. It’s that other people’s memory of what Reade told her appears to change also.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:18 |
|
Zook posted:why would you remember something your neighbor told you decades ago without trying? do you think she's part of a conspiracy? what's the 'problem' here? If your neighbour called you up and described a conversation that you had two decades ago and had forgotten. do you think you could reliably say whether or not that conversation had actually happened?
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:22 |
|
Lemming posted:Why are you pointedly ignoring the phone call her mother gave which specifically mentions the event, which is unambiguous and objective evidence of someone talking about it without "changing their memory"? The phone call to Larry King does not mention any instance of sexual assault or harassment, by Biden or anyone else. The earliest recorded mention of anything like that is in the court documents relating to her ex husband, but these again do not mention Biden specifically.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:25 |
|
Lemming posted:Yeah I'm done with this charade, this guy was banned for being gross about calling Reade a liar before and it's clear no amount of good faith discussion is going to amount to anything. Who the gently caress else could it be, she was working for Biden. A senators staff includes dozens of people. The reporters investigating the allegations interviewed more than 70 colleagues.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:29 |
|
christmas boots posted:IIRC didn’t it later turn out through court documents that Ellison was the one who had been abused? The evidence against Ellison was significantly weaker than that against Biden. IIRC by that standard the only allegations against Biden that aren’t believable are the ones made by Christine O’Donnell’s niece, which were alleged to have happened at a public event held when Biden was verifiably in a different state.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:36 |
|
socialsecurity posted:Huh I hadn't heard about that, now I understand why people question that one neighbor that did not remember until Reade not that I agree with them. This whole thing is a mess did Reade ever press charges so there could be a full real investigation or has it been too long I'm not sure if sexual assault has a statute of limitations. Statute of limitations, for a crime committed in the 1990s only murder could still be prosecuted. And obviously “beyond a reasonable doubt” is not a reasonable standard of evidence for “should this person hold the most powerful elected office in existence”.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:39 |
|
Zook posted:It is not gross to speak up about a rape victim who the entire media suppressed in order to propel her rapist into the most powerful office in the world, I don't know how you even square that. I truly do not understand the “media suppressed it” argument. It was a top news story for months!
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 11:09 |
|
Abhorrence posted:This also mystifies me. Were I head of Fox news, and trying to smear Biden, you wouldn't be able to watch a minute of Fox without hearing Tara Reade's tale. Trump, in an example of that famous message discipline he is so well known for, publicly implied that he doesn’t think it’s true.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2021 23:50 |