Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

Eararaldor posted:

Ah..... Because I’m in the Uk and not heard anything yet :(

Fwiw WW1984 premiers on Sky Ticket on the 18th in Germany. If that's the precedent, non-HBO'd countries might be looking at mid-May?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010
Why does Bruce Wayne still dress up as Batman in a post-apocalyptic wasteland? It seems like there would be no one left to protect his identity from, or to inspire.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:

It's called the Knightmare because the Batman costume is a suit of armor. He is Batman.

Like, metaphorically? Seems like he should be wearing the suit he wore to fight Superman.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

well why not posted:

Watch the first 5 minutes of Batman V Superman and pretend you don't know what a Superman is. Bruce Wayne looks up as he clutches that kid and sees two kryptonians. Not Superman fighting Zod. Just two aliens making the city into scrap. How could he know that Superman was a benevolent force?

Isn't Batman's thing being super prepared/the world's greatest detective? Seems like he could've looked into Superman at some point between the attack on Metropolis and trying to kill him.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

Shanty posted:

It wasn't a question of being unprepared/a bad detective, because he does completely succeed in his mission to never let that happen again. He just needed to see supes in a different light. You can't really deduce your way into empathy, and Bruce basically locked his away in his mother's tomb.

But the idea is that Bruce just sees "sees two kryptonians, not Superman fighting Zod." The military was aware of what was going on. That Superman was benevolent was known.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

McSpanky posted:

That was brought up and accounted for, "if there is even a 1% chance he could become a threat we have to treat it as an absolute certainty". Bruce is jaded as hell after spending 20 years fighting crime in Gotham with nothing to show for it, most of his enemies were good people turned bad by terrible circumstances and corruption is rife at every level. He simply doesn't believe that someone with Superman's power will remain good and not become a civilization-ending threat some day.

I guess this is my problem with BvS. I think it would've gone a lot further if, instead of seeing the Waynes get murdered yet again, the opening was an actual scene of Robin getting murdered. Every Batman loses his parents but not every Batman starts branding people so they can get murdered in prison and it feels like the audience is just expected to go along with this interpretation.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

KVeezy3 posted:

Certainly, the death of Batman’s parents has been a staple of every Batman film, but we should recognize how Snyder does it differently and how dependent the entire structure of the film is on that opening. “Martha” memes aside, the theme of parental figures permeates the film. While Batman is having nightmares about his parents and his mother being a monstrous vampire, Superman is able to turn to his mother and (The idea of) his father to find a calm island in times of crisis. The film makes Lex Luthor into a Jr., and although Luthor Sr. is long gone, his presence remains an ominous specter over the film.

Robin’s murder is an important event, but far more crucial to Batman’s descent is Snyder’s critique of Batman’s entire vigilante career. Clark investigates Batman and is deeply troubled that he’s mostly targeting the underclass with the consent of the police (An investigation that his boss doesn’t want him to do in lieu of puff pieces, the film’s critique of private news media under contemporary capitalism). Batman reflects on the fact that he hasn’t been able to cause real change, that “Criminals are like weeds” - the trauma of losing his parents to street level crime has him blinded to a structural analysis, which he comes face to face with at the end of BvS when the justice system lets Lex Luthor off free.

Batman is both the point of view character who has understandable reasons to distrust Superman, even though the audience knows he's good because he was the hero of this first film, but also a vicious vigilante who's deeply troubled and condemns any criminal he comes in contact with to death. It's like Snyder wanted to have his cake and eat it too. At least the death of Robin would have given Batman a concrete breaking point that he could eventually work back towards.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply