Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Fluffy Bunnies posted:

I don't know why the US is so averse to tracking. We could all do these things so much safer if we were tracking like many other countries do because people would know they were exposed when others in their vicinity (like that Chinese buffet) happen to pop positive

I miss my favorite Chinese buffet and I would absolutely go if my local numbers were lower (the county its in is brick red for transmission and deaths! yay!) and we had tracking.

Contact tracing is pretty much pointless when daily cases levels are above a certain point because it'd be pretty much impossible to share that information with the community in a timely manner. If your county regularly gets 50 positive cases a day and each of those cases probably visited 5 or more public places in the days before they tested then the local government would have to issue a list of over 250 locations/times every day and ask everyone to check the list each time it comes out and if they visited any of those locations during those times to then go get tested and quarantine until they got their result. Of course that's assuming that every person who tests positive will even agree to cooperate with the contact tracers, which we know isn't happening. Another option is to have QR codes in every shop, school, library, etc so people can sign in whenever they visit or to use a phone app which registers when people get within a certain distance of anyone else with the app and I can't imagine that either of those would be all that successful in the US.
Of course venues should still announce when they've had an outbreak among the staff or something but I'm sure they'd be under a fair amount of pressure to just not mention it. Anecdotally I've already heard from a bunch of people in the US that their offices don't tell them when someone in the company has popped positive, and there's lots of stories about schools not telling parents when a kid's classmate has popped positive because they'd got real stupid ideas about what constitutes a "close contact" because they're already running low on staff and they want to minimize the number of kids that go into quarantine.


We had a single case of community spread in Sydney Australia on Wednesday and we're mobilizing a huge amount of resources to contact trace this one guy and so far we haven't been able to figure out how this one random dude (who doesn't work in quarantine services and hasn't traveled overseas) even came into contact with the virus in the first place. We were able to figure out via genomic sequencing that the original source was a specific person who is already in hotel quarantine but we haven't been able to figure out any connection between the two cases, so there has to be at least one other infectious person out in the community we can't find.
The health department has issued a list of the venues the man visited in the days before he got tested:

.... and the area of Greater Sydney (over 5 million people) have been placed under a raft of restrictions until at least Monday:

quote:

- No more than 20 guests (including children) to gather in a household
- Masks compulsory on public transport and in public indoor venues including retail, theatres, hospitals and aged care facilities
- Front of house hospitality staff must wear face masks
- Drinking while standing in indoor venue is not allowed
- Singing by audiences at indoor shows or at indoor worship is not allowed
- Dancing is not allowed in indoor hospitality venues or clubs, except for at weddings where it's recommended no more than 20 people are on a dancefloor at one time
- Visitors to aged care facilities must be limited to two people
They announced Thursday morning that the restrictions would be imposed from 5pm that evening and people were like "But what if we use public transport and we didn't bring a mask with us this morning?" and the answer was "Well go buy one, dumbass" lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
I guess we should also mention this in this thread:
https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1390021145911513089


E: LOL
https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1390023742194061312

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

boar guy posted:

that's going to be a problem for a lot of people. i know for a fact that people are all a little crazy right now; i had several parents come up to me after games I reffed and say stuff like 'sorry for yelling at you, i just haven't seen my kid play in so long' which on a personal level makes me go :psyduck: but on a practical level i suppose i understand

all sorts of incidents through the first 5 weeks of the year with people screaming at like 15 year old referees and stuff. many people just plain forgot how to act

The aggro levels are crazy high right now

quote:

FAA warns of spike in unruly, dangerous passenger behavior

The Federal Aviation Administration is warning air travelers about what it describes as a dramatic increase in unruly or dangerous behavior aboard passenger airplanes.

In a typical year, the transportation agency sees 100 to 150 formal cases of bad passenger behavior. But since the start of this year, the agency said, the number of reported cases has jumped to 1,300, an even more remarkable number since the number of passengers remains below pre-pandemic levels.

The behavior in question includes passengers refusing to wear masks, drinking excessively and engaging in alleged physical or verbal assault, including what the agency describes as political intimidation and harassment of lawmakers.

In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for example, a fistfight broke out amid a dispute over mask-wearing. In Washington, D.C., a passenger was escorted off a flight after arguing with flight attendants over the mask rule.

In another case, a flight bound for Los Angeles was diverted to Denver and forced to make an emergency landing after a passenger allegedly tried to open an emergency exit.

In recent days, Alaska Airlines banned an Alaska state senator for refusing to comply with mask requirements, according to The Anchorage Daily News.

“It is not permissible and we will not tolerate interfering with a flight crew and the performance of their safety duties,” Stephen Dickson, the administrator of the FAA, said of the wave of incidents. “Period.”

The FAA is now taking a “zero-tolerance” approach to poor behavior: Unruly passengers face potential criminal charges, fines up to $35,000 or lifetime bans on certain airlines.

[....]

Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants union, said airline employees have reported a wide range of troubling incidents.

“What we have seen on our planes is flight attendants being physically assaulted, pushed, choked,” Nelson said. “We have a passenger urinate. We had a passenger spit into the mouth of a child on board.

“These are some of the things that we have been dealing with,” Nelson said, adding that the physical and verbal abuse that flight attendants have allegedly experienced this year has been “way off the charts” compared to the last 20 years.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/faa-warns-spike-unruly-dangerous-passenger-behavior-n1266156


Saros posted:

So good news as long as you ignore the fact the UK still can't be arsed to do even the bare minimum quarantine and contact tracing.
Seychelles island managed to get their population of 98,000 residents 60% vaxxed and then declared that the pandemic was over as far as they were concerned and threw open their borders to any tourist who could show a negative PCR test from the 72 hours before arrival, no vaccine and no quarantine required. That didn't go well for them, with a sudden surge in cases forcing them to close schools and ban sports etc etc..
The fact that they mostly vaxxed their population with Sinopharm and Covishield prrrrrrrrrrrrrobably factored into the outbreak as well.

E: I'm seeing a bunch of anti-vax fuckwits on social media whining "If Seychelles is the most vaxxed country in the world and they're still getting massive outbreaks then what is even the point of these vaccines??!??!???"



Mr.Pibbleton posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qxtxIVtOZE

Got the game cancelled, then after testing he popped positive for the roni.

He not only got the game cancelled, he got the entire NBA season cancelled (and the NHL, MLB and MLS followed soon after). But that chain of events was also what convinced a huge percentage of the US population that this virus thing is actually pretty serious and they should stop loving around with it so in a weird roundabout way Gobert's dumb stunt probably saved a lot of lives.

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 02:47 on May 7, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Regarde Aduck posted:

That article is all over the place in its implications.

So 60% are vaccined, but none with mRNA ones which continue to be regarded as the best. They opened the doors and saw a massive rise in cases. But then it says nothing about hospital admissions and deaths. So are they all asymptomatic? I thought the main objective of the vaccines was to reduce severity. So isn't it inevitable that cases are going to rise?

It then finishes by saying UK cases have massively fallen after vaccination but most people are getting AZ, which is the same as Covidshield right? So uh.... why is it different? Is this implication they're tiptoeing around 'the UK is super hosed'? I mean it wouldn't surprise me, our government is clownshoes, but again I thought the objective of the vaccines was just to reduce severity and associated pressure on health systems. Like I was paying attention to death rates but the media seems to be going off cases.

So many implications but little information. Was the case rise just a wave of intense extraordinary amounts of people that may or may not matter much in terms of deaths? Is it a sign that AZ is ineffective which has major implications for the UK? What even are the objectives of the vaccines? Reducing severity or reducing cases? If the objective is to reduce both then yeah our lives are going to have to stay disrupted, no cinemas, restaurants or sports games until better vaccines (if possible). If its just to reduce deaths then we can do more assuming the vaccines work. Whichever one of these is true, it needs to be communicated better. Because I don't know what the gently caress the news stories want me to take away from this. Sometimes it's like they're cheerfully stating the apocalypse before ending with a snappy quip and then a clickbait link.

Yeah the news media have really been beating up the story. Here's where they're at with infections:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/seychelles/

Their averaged rate peaked a few days ago at 145 cases. Which sound like not a lot at all, but since new year's they've had 6000 cases which is pretty significant for an island with a population of only 98,000 people.

They've also only had 28 deaths on the island throughout the entire pandemic, but 8 of them were in the last week.

E: of course that's only the numbers up to today, you never can tell where that exponential growth is going to end up

Regarde Aduck posted:

I mean it's an interesting case: If vaccines don't allow Seychelles to open their doors then how is a place like that, which depends mostly on tourism, going to survive?

Hotel quarantine for incoming travelers. Asking for nothing apart from a negative PCR in the 72 hours before arriving is GUARANTEED to bring in cases, it's massively massively inadequate.

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 04:35 on May 7, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Platystemon posted:

What are the implications?

It also means there's a much much smaller number of people who developed natural antibody protection via infection than many people had been assuming

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

QuarkJets posted:

Out of 4262 confirmed infections among vaccinated individuals, 9 died. That's about 2 in 1000. That's compared to 32 unvaccinated individuals dying, out of 6100 confirmed infections, so a very nice reduction in infections, deaths, and everything in-between, but not the "one in ten million" chance that was being posted about earlier

e: Even if you assumed that the entire sample size was exposed to infection, which you should not, that'd be 9 / 600,000 (the vaccinated population size alone was 600k)

Yeah even though the media made a huge deal about how the vaccines were rated 100% effective against death it was always pretty much certain that we'd get at least some cases anyway given the vaccines' efficacy rate against infection, the increased severity of the variants and the fact that there's a LOT of people out there with serious pre-existing conditions. You roll the dice a couple hundred thousand or a couple million times and it'll happen eventually.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Lincolnstein posted:

People really like drinking beer, eating Chinese food and going to watch other people play sports. Pity.

The fools! They've doomed us all!!!!

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

Where I live we haven’t had any of these things since March 2020 :(

This happened not that far from my neighbourhood about three weeks ago:



78,000 people jampacked into an arena, no masks required

I'm in Australia, at that point we hadn't had any community spread cases of coronavirus for several months

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Fenarisk posted:

Just realized the vast majority are over it or given up. I'm in patient facing Healthcare and nearly the whole department has vacations and events and traveling planned starting in June.

Australians still have to apply for government exemptions to travel overseas and tourism isn't allowed so it turns out they all decided to travel around Australia instead, which has massively boosted our own tourism industry and propped up our national economy. We actually had record back-to-back growth for two quarters thanks to the increase in domestic spending

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-unexpected-stimulus-how-the-closed-border-helped-save-the-economy-20210505-p57p7m.html

....... so if you hear anyone try to argue that "lockdowns ruin the economy" then tell them they're wrong

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Lolie posted:

We don't have no community spread. Right now we're under restrictions because of a community case.

Genomic testing shows that this guy must have got it via transmission from hotel quarantine to the community but the missing link remains unidentified despite exhaustive contact tracing.

Yeah even Fortress Australia isn't immune to a sudden case of community spread popping up with absolutely no warning, it's an incredibly sneaky virus. I've noticed that people in Melbourne are getting super lax over the few pandemic restrictions we still have in place so we just have to hope that they keep getting tested if they get fly symptoms.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Whoops, Melbourne Australia has another case of covid. This time it's a returned traveler who went through the full 14 day hotel quarantine over in South Australia and was released a week ago, when he flew back to Melbourne and went home. 4 days later he started developing symptoms, he got tested yesterday and his positive test result came through this morning


https://twitter.com/VicGovDH/status/1391938437779836928


The current best guess is that he somehow got it from another returned traveler while he was in hotel quarantine, on his very last day of quarantine the person in the room next to him popped positive.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-11/victoria-covid-19-case-man-north-of-melbourne/100131038

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 05:16 on May 11, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1391864914571055113

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Der Kyhe posted:

Well, at least it is nice to hear that the vaccination is working and places with herd immunity can go back to normal. Meanwhile in our Northern Socialist Hellscape
[...]
-Being asked "why aren't the infection case numbers getting lower even if around 2/5 of the population is vaccinated at least once" the officials answered "because our strategy right now is not to vaccinate those age groups and people who most likely get the infection". No followup questions.

The actual answer is that herd immunity isn't the point where the virus disappears, it's the point where the reproduction rate R0 = 1 and the virus stops increasing exponentially, and it's only once you pass that point that the numbers start getting lower. There's still going to be a long tail of cases & deaths after the herd immunity point has been reached.

Of course if the government is also imposing other kinds of restrictions (masks mandates, social distancing, crowd limits etc etc) that'll artificially push the number of infections down and if they manage to keep them in place until herd immunity is reached that means the tail of cases & deaths will start from a much lower count and will be a lot shorter, but if they open 'er up prematurely cases will just shoot up all over again.


The NY Times did an article about different paths towards herd immunity where they looked at how increases in vaccine supply/restrictions/variants will effect how quickly the population reaches herd immunity and the rate of deaths in each scenario and the obvious conclusion is "Increase vaccine production and for the love of god don't drop the precautions"

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/learning/whats-going-on-in-this-graph-covid-herd-immunity.html

Note that I think their estimates for "total immunity" (number of vaxxed people + number of recovered infections) is incredibly optimistic and massively overestimates the number of recovered infections, plus their graphs which show vaccine supply continuing "at the current pace" obviously show an increase in supply, plus assuming that vaxx uptake will remain at a steady pace and not drop off at all or hit an upper limity thanks to vaxx hesitancy is also pretty naive.

Also note that they don't cover the 5th scenario "vaccine supply continues at current pace, more contagious variants appear but we also ease up on restrictions" which is what most of the US seems to be doing

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Uhhhh I guess this is good news???!??

https://twitter.com/MackLamoureux/status/1392122037175390210

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Is anyone else weirded out by all the corporate PR tie-ins to the US pandemic? It started with free Krispy Kreme donuts but a whole lot of businesses are getting in on the act now. I haven't seen anything like this in Australia

https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1392231056984707072
https://twitter.com/bangordailynews/status/1392177986384900102
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1392167740354580484

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 12:25 on May 12, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Fallom posted:

Yeah bad Americans whatever. Why do we have to keep relearning lessons on what motivates huge chunks of our population? Should’ve set up a partnership with Coca Cola and Valvoline in the first place instead of wasting a ton of time appealing to a mental organ that doesn’t exist in half the people.

The Trump administration actually went in the opposite direction and used the pandemic as an excuse to confiscate PPE shipments from the states in order to push corporate funding via backroom deals LOL

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Well I haven't had even my first jab yet and what's more I don't know when I will and there's nothing you can do to hurry me along. :smug:


Because I'm in Australia and under 50 years old so I couldn't even get a vaccine even if I wanted to, and there's no official word on when I might be able to get it

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Lolie posted:

Australia seems to have settled on Moderna as the booster if choice for next year.

....... if we ever get around to approving it for use, which we haven't yet. :v:

But there's no huge rush, we're jabbing arms at a leisurely pace

quote:

At our current pace of roughly 421,000 doses a week, we can expect to reach the 40 million doses needed to fully vaccinate Australia’s adult population in mid January 2023.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-02/charting-australias-covid-vaccine-rollout/13197518?nw=0

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Akuma posted:

Is there any robust evidence that this is a concern? I thought the known variants weren't different enough to evade the vaccines, and that anything else was just hearsay and pessimism? Genuine question, I've probably missed something...

Some of the mutations that we're seeing in variants apparently increase vaccine resistance. E484K (which is found in the Brazil B.1.1.28.2 variant and the South Africa 501.V2 variant) is the main one but E484Q (India B.1.617 variant) also looks iffy. A small number of the UK B.1.1.7 variant have been detected with the E484K mutation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variants_of_SARS-CoV-2#Notable_missense_mutations

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

If U.K. fauci Dr Whitty says the current vaccinations work against the current Indian variant then I’m not going to believe a god drat word anyone else says :colbert:

I’m utterly sick of the U.K. media trotting out fringe scientists who have an axe to grind or are flat out making money off of doom mongering. The only people who have the real data work for public health England/the NHS and they are not mouthing off in the independent.

It’s been like this right from when the vaccinations started, the scumbags in every paper pandering to the sick fucks getting off on the idea of mass death who don’t want to believe the actual charts,; “so here’s the exact evidence that counteracts what you can see with your eyes saying the vaccinations will stop working tomorrow, feel free to spread this utter slurry over the internet everyone!”

Are you missing the difference between "evade" and "resist"? Just because the variants have a higher vaccine resistance doesn't mean the vaccines are suddenly useless, their efficacy against the variants is just lower


Mozi posted:

i'd rather listen to the science than make mask wearing into a political statement but you do you

The article quoting Fauci says that people still need to wear masks outside in crowded situations

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

No, I’m saying I’m not getting my information off Twitter and the news. Take all the paranoia in this thread, make it a man and you got one Dr Whitty, so when he starts worrying I do.

Well I'm real glad for you but it would perhaps help your case if you would post a loving link to whatever it was that Whitty said rather than shout at people, your current posting style is not contributing anything to the thread

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1392907170702839808

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/participate-in-activities.html

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 06:19 on May 14, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Spinz posted:

Ha
Perfect

Seriously for me the most amazing one is to be indoor with a choir???
They should specify how important it is if everyone loving there is vaccinated or not!!!

They don't do it enough with those charts imo

Vaccinated people can now sing indoors with a choir without a mask even if some of the other people are unvaccinated. (Those unvaccinated people should be wearing masks, however)



Edit: unless they're singing in a choir in a hospital, prison, homeless shelter, airport, airplane, bus or Uber. Everywhere else is just fine!

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Also they have to be fully vaccinated, if they're within 2 weeks of their final shot they still have to mask up & socially distance
https://twitter.com/davidalim/status/1392911339153154050

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Also keep in mind that only 42.5% of adults in the US are fully vaxxed so if you're at an indoor venue or a very crowded outdoor venue you should expect to see almost 2/3 of the adults and nearly 100% of the children over 2 still wearing masks.


https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

freebooter posted:

I love how they say "we've gotten this far" as though America's overall pandemic response has been anything other than a worst-case scenario

I love that they end with "please protect yourself until we get to the finish line" like uhhhhhhhhhh what's your definition of a "finish line" there dudes and when do you expect we'll get there

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Meanwhile the UK is going in the other direction
https://twitter.com/breeallegretti/status/1392947865035681796

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

The crazy part is that the Indian strain raging through the UK is the sublineage B.1.617.2 which for the most part doesn't even have the E484Q mutation.

B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.3 both have the E484Q mutation but B.1.617.3 is rare and although B.1.617.1 is occurring a lot more frequently and is highly infectious it looks like B.1.617.2 outcompetes it. It looks like B.1.617.2 will even give the Kent strain B.1.1.7 a run for its money.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lineage_B.1.617


E: WHO has also bumped it up from Variant of Interest to Variant of Concern
https://twitter.com/Laurie_Garrett/status/1391802341423190020


Variant of High Consequence is the one you really gotta watch out for but none of the variants so far have gotten enough power ups to reach that level of scariness

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 15:47 on May 14, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

BlackIronHeart posted:

I don't expect that at all, and you can't convince me I should expect that in this reality.

https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1392952564514238467

The official plan is "Just assume all adult Americans are rational actors who will make an informed decision and act in everyone's best interests"

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

AHH F/UGH posted:

Surely this will completely change the perception for chuds on Fauci since for so long they were angry and complaining that “I’M AN AMERICAN AND I’M AN ADULT I CAN DO WHAT I WANT” and now they can do that right

Surely it will

Also Biden:
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1392935847863934987

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
The data is in!! Trust the science!!!!

https://twitter.com/GovInslee/status/1392961734013378560

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Meanwhile, in professional sports (one of the last places where everyone is still being regularly tested)
https://twitter.com/DukeStJournal/status/1392951287847792644

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 18:37 on May 14, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Green Nail Polish posted:

I'm really not confusing anything at all.
Yeah you are. Specifically this part:

Green Nail Polish posted:

What exactly is your point? If you're trying to suggest the vaccines don't work because of the Yankees cases, I think it's just flat out wrong.

No one loving said that you idiot, you've badly misinterpreted the entire conversation and you're screaming at a strawman you invented


Also that Eric Topol guy you posted is full of poo poo, he hasn't seen the actual test results from the infected players so he's just making guesses

Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 06:32 on May 15, 2021

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
Also "The chance that [a breathrough patient] could spread covid is close to zero, yet to be documented" has some real "preliminary investigations found no clear evidence" energy

https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1217043229427761152

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

Fucks sake read the whole god drat sentence not just the bit of it you can cherry pick and “win” a non-existent argument over.

It makes absolutely no loving sense whatsoever to

You seem upset, friend

Have a big warm CDC-approved maskless outdoors hug!!! :glomp:

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Green Nail Polish posted:

This isn't true at all. The vaccines greatly reduce the chance that you will contract Covid-19, and if you do get it, they even more greatly reduce the chance that you will get sick, and they even more MORE greatly reduce the chance you will be hospitalized.

Please don't spread misinformation.

We don't actually have good information on how many breakthrough cases are occurring in the US, by design. The CDC decided to stop counting all but the most serious cases back in April and they're not interested in keeping any stats on the asymptomatic breakthrough cases

quote:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.

Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

The original vaccine trials mostly focused on symptomatic cases and even then a lot of them relied on the recipients to be self-reporting so they're not a great indicator of the prevalence of breakthrough cases, and most of the trials occurred before the nastier vaccine-resistant variants came about.

There are lots of reported of fully vaccinated people in India being hospitalized and dying but the reporting over there is such a total poo poo show there's absolutely no way of knowing what their prevalence of extreme breakthrough cases might be

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

fat bossy gerbil posted:

You know I’m actually all for the CDC saying masks off. Our government is far, far too evil and our population far, far too stupid to actually do what’s necessary to stop this so gently caress it, just let it run rampant.

Unfortunately it'll mostly be minorities who get hosed over the hardest

https://twitter.com/isaiah_bb/status/1393592908402597894

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

They are even beginning to say the lab evidence shows the current vaccines are all effective against the Indian variant

Heyyy now that's some super vague wording there. Are they 100% effective? 90%?? 60%??

You pull this vague bullshit all the time, making these sweeping statements that don't have any actual facts or figures in them.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Pennywise the Frown posted:

People can't just do whatever they want after they are vaxxed. They need to still take precautions. Jesus gently caress you guys.

Hey the CDC wouldn't just lie to people about something like this, surely you must be mistaken


E: you haven't even seen the worst of this yet, there's a bunch of school districts arguing that they should drop the mask mandates for kids immediately even though they're obviously not vaxxed up

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

learnincurve posted:

The evidence shows that in the tiny number of breakthrough cases vaccinated people under 60 get a mild case which isn’t passed on, some very elderly and vulnerable people end up in hospital.

Oh so you're claiming 100% effectiveness for people under 60? Are you sure you want to do that??

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply