[auspol] Or the idiot is a racist pile of garbage and that is completely untrue. Who can say.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > C-SPAM > [auspol] Or the idiot is a racist pile of garbage and that is completely untrue. Who can say.

«‹›152 »

birdstrike: Oct 30, 2008; i;m gay

poo poo yeah ground floor

bring back LF

# ? May 11, 2021 09:58

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 4, 2024 18:15

Animal Friend: Sep 7, 2011

birdstrike posted:

poo poo yeah ground floor

bring back LF

lol

# ? May 11, 2021 09:59

bell jar: Feb 25, 2009

this thread is more pathetic than albo lol

:qq:

got probated ffrom the other thread please endorse me cspam :qq:

# ? May 11, 2021 10:01

birdstrike: Oct 30, 2008; i;m gay

name a more iconic duo. I�ll wait

# ? May 11, 2021 10:04

crepeface: Nov 5, 2004; r*p*f*c*

please do not bring outside drama to this thread, this is about posting about politics while you throw a shrimp on the barbie.

# ? May 11, 2021 10:09

Mola Yam: Jun 18, 2004; Kali Ma Shakti de!

lol did this thread already go to poo poo by the top of page two

noice mate

# ? May 11, 2021 10:11

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

You started it in the op oval office

# ? May 11, 2021 10:11

thatfatkid: Feb 20, 2011; by Azathoth

to the dnd auspol regulars, gently caress you you cunts

# ? May 11, 2021 10:16

crepeface: Nov 5, 2004; r*p*f*c*

Mola Yam posted:

lol did this thread already go to poo poo by the top of page two

noice mate

lol very normal for d&d posters to be so mad that there's a thread in another subforum

crepeface has issued a correction as of 10:20 on May 11, 2021

# ? May 11, 2021 10:17

Animal Friend: Sep 7, 2011

Give Rapeface's reeducation camp the open mind it deserves. Don't read the OP though, it brings in external drama

# ? May 11, 2021 10:19

realbez: Mar 23, 2005; Fun Shoe

RAPEFACE

# ? May 11, 2021 10:22

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

BRI funding for SA accounts

# ? May 11, 2021 10:26

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Taiwan number #1

# ? May 11, 2021 10:31

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

I'm sorry c-spam mods for the several hundred reports on my post that included the word oval office in an Australian thread posted by a oval office.

# ? May 11, 2021 10:34

do it on my face: Feb 6, 2005; °

crepeface posted:

lol very normal for d&d posters to be so mad that they make a thread in another subforum

# ? May 11, 2021 10:35

thatfatkid: Feb 20, 2011; by Azathoth

gently caress off dickhead, are you cunts seriously so offended at the concept of people pointing out the racist anti-china poo poo you guys unquestionably swallow?

# ? May 11, 2021 10:36

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

I dont swallow it, I produce it :smuggo:

# ? May 11, 2021 10:40

BBJoey: Oct 31, 2012

BurgerQuest posted:

I dont swallow it, I produce it

https://twitter.com/goodbeanaltalt/status/1237099838828883969

# ? May 11, 2021 10:41

TammyHEH: Dec 11, 2013; Alfrything is only the ghost of a memory...

thatfatkid posted:

gently caress off dickhead, are you cunts seriously so offended at the concept of people pointing out the racist anti-china poo poo you guys unquestionably swallow?

You seem very mad lol

# ? May 11, 2021 10:41

BurgerQuest: Mar 17, 2009; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Speaking of swallowing it had anyone seen that Uyghur rape compilation on pornhub? loving sweet as A+ would jerk again

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

# ? May 11, 2021 10:45

realbez: Mar 23, 2005; Fun Shoe

BurgerQuest posted:

Speaking of swallowing it had anyone seen that Uyghur rape compilation on pornhub? loving sweet as A+ would jerk again

what the gently caress?

# ? May 11, 2021 10:47

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY: Feb 3, 2006

BurgerQuest posted:

Speaking of swallowing it had anyone seen that Uyghur rape compilation on pornhub? loving sweet as A+ would jerk again

Gross but exactly what I expect to hear from an aussie.

# ? May 11, 2021 10:47

TammyHEH: Dec 11, 2013; Alfrything is only the ghost of a memory...

BurgerQuest posted:

Speaking of swallowing it had anyone seen that Uyghur rape compilation on pornhub? loving sweet as A+ would jerk again

Ok wtf

# ? May 11, 2021 10:48

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY: Feb 3, 2006

Subscribing to BurgerQuest's youtube channel asap.

# ? May 11, 2021 10:49

e-dt: Sep 16, 2019

love the auspol thread, its about australian politics.

# ? May 11, 2021 10:59

thatfatkid: Feb 20, 2011; by Azathoth

actual auspol content: looking forward to the lnp budget announcement which will no doubt include massive funding to yet more road projects, gas power stations and gently caress all for public transport or wind/solar energy.

it definitely wont be designed in a way to gently caress over state alp govts either

also will definitely have some poo poo about empowering women by allowing them to go into debt easier

# ? May 11, 2021 11:03

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY: Feb 3, 2006

thatfatkid posted:

actual auspol content: looking forward to the lnp budget announcement which will no doubt include massive funding to yet more road projects, gas power stations and gently caress all for public transport or wind/solar energy.

it definitely wont be designed in a way to gently caress over state alp govts either

also will definitely have some poo poo about empowering women by allowing them to go into debt easier

And the abc will eat it all up while getting defunded some more.

# ? May 11, 2021 11:07

commie kong: Mar 7, 2019

alright, winners and losers here we fucken go

winners:
Vaccines
Women
Aged care
Child care
Gaming industry
Small brewers
Taxpayers
Mental health
Businesses
Farmers
Medical start ups

losers:
Renewables
International tourism
Migration rate
Universities

neutral:
Young people
International students
Refugees

# ? May 11, 2021 11:08

TammyHEH: Dec 11, 2013; Alfrything is only the ghost of a memory...

commie kong posted:

alright, winners and losers here we fucken go

winners:
Vaccines
Women
Aged care
Child care
Gaming industry
Small brewers
Taxpayers
Mental health
Businesses
Farmers
Medical start ups

losers:
Renewables
International tourism
Migration rate
Universities

neutral:
Young people
International students
Refugees

Im hesitant to call this even neutral for young people

# ? May 11, 2021 11:15

commie kong: Mar 7, 2019

neutral here is a bit like snopes�s �mixture�

# ? May 11, 2021 11:17

crepeface: Nov 5, 2004; r*p*f*c*

to be fair, they don't need much since planet will soon be a lifeless orb floating in the inky void

# ? May 11, 2021 11:17

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY: Feb 3, 2006

Soft touch Morrison taking it easy on the refugees yet again.

# ? May 11, 2021 11:19

TammyHEH: Dec 11, 2013; Alfrything is only the ghost of a memory...

House prices to go up even after the heat death of the planet

# ? May 11, 2021 11:19

birdstrike: Oct 30, 2008; i;m gay

Gittins posted:

This is the lick-and-a-promise budget. The budget that proves it is possible to be half pregnant. Which makes it the couldabeen budget. Scott Morrison and Josh Frydenberg had the makings of a champion of budgets, but their courage failed them.

It�s not a bad budget. Most of the things it does are good things to do. Its goal of driving unemployment much lower is exactly right. Its approach of increasing rather than cutting government spending is correct, as is its strategy of fixing the economy to fix the budget.

But having fixed on the right strategy Morrison, reluctant to be seen as Labor lite, has failed in its execution. Economists call this �product differentiation�; others just call it marketing.

Some are calling this a big-spending budget. It isn�t. Frydenberg has kept his promise that it would be no �spendathon�. As a pre-election vote-buying budget it hardly rates. Its �new and additional tax cut� for middle-income earners of up to $1080 a year turns out to be not a tax cut but the absence of a tax increase.

Politically, this budget had to offer a convincing response to the report of the royal commission on aged care. Reports have suggested fixing the broken system would take extra spending of about $10 billion a year.

Had he accepted that challenge, Morrison would have put himself head and shoulders above his Liberal and Labor predecessors. He settled for spending an extra $3.5 billion a year. Major patch-up at best. The scandals will continue.

Politically, Morrison had to make this a women-friendly budget, to prove he valued women�s contribution to the economy and remove impediments to their economic security. Making childcare free � as it was, briefly, during the lockdown � would have been a big help to young families, as well as greatly increasing employment. It would have backed his fine words with deeds.

That would have cost about $2 billion a year. Morrison settled for $600 million a year, limiting the new assistance to about one childcare-using family in four by excluding the great majority, who have only one child in care.

Frydenberg has said that significant investments in energy, infrastructure, skills, the digital economy and lower taxes are all aimed at driving unemployment down.

But this talk of �investments� in mainly male-dominated industries is just what led female economists to be so critical of last year�s macho budget. In any case, energy and infrastructure yield few new jobs for each billion spent.

That�s why women-friendly and job-creating both pointed to a budget that focused on growing the �care economy� � aged care, childcare, disability care.

It�s labour-intensive, employs mainly women and provides services that women care about more than men. And it�s largely funded and regulated by � the federal government. Opportunity fumbled.

If you can�t get too excited by the expectation that the economy will grow by a positively roaring 4.25 per cent in the coming financial year, and a much more sedate 2.5 per cent the following year, I don�t blame you.

For one thing, budget forecasts don�t always come to pass. For another, Frydenberg�s claim that more budgetary stimulus is needed because of continuing uncertainty over the pandemic is disingenuous.

The truth is, at this stage the economy is still running on the stored heat of last year�s massive budgetary stimulus, much of which has still to be spent. The purpose of public-sector stimulus is to get the private sector � households and businesses � up to ignition point, so it keeps going under its own steam.

That hasn�t happened yet. So the purpose of the further stimulus in this year�s budget is to keep the kick-starting going until the private sector�s engine gets going.

Much of this depends on a return to decent pay rises � which is, as yet, beyond the budget�s �forecast horizon�. We haven�t had a decent pay rise since before the election of the Coalition government.

We had been used to our standard of living getting a bit better each year. That hasn�t happened for years. A Liberal Prime Minister who can�t lift our standard of living should be peddling a lot harder than he is in this budget.