|
op how do you deal with movies that are 24 fps but assume there will be motion blur & look choppy when there's no motion blur
Khorne fucked around with this message at 17:14 on May 14, 2021 |
#
?
May 14, 2021 16:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 01:00 |
|
|
Chumbawumba4ever97 posted:Maybe the cgi was done at a different framerate or something One scene that stuck out particularly was when the t-rex was sniffing on the car and turning its head and stuff. There was a super obvious spring-back when it stopped like it was just a big weight on a hydraulic lift (which it was). I guess it was just a frame in the original but when interpolated it got really noticeable. The CG stuff would have been animated more smoothly.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 17:12
|
|
|
The Bloop posted:These are the same people that watch shows at the wrong aspect ratio and seem genuinely not to notice that everyone looks like they're in a funhouse mirror you're wrong I've never noticed this framerate smoothing thing but I absolutely do notice when things are in the wrong aspect ratio, because uh... it's obvious? whereas having more frames just means it is less stuttery i guess. can't see why i would notice the absence of stuttering, much less notice it and think "this is an OUTRAGE" the last time there was a thread like this in GBS i posted the same thing and some guy got on my case like "lol i bet you watch the fullscreen versions of movies grandpa" or w/e
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 18:19
|
|
|
i remember seeing the hobbit in theaters in 3d at 60 fps and it gave me a headache and then i fell asleep because it was so boring
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 18:53
|
|
|
I only tolerate slide shows and planetariums.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 19:00
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:lol i bet you watch the fullscreen versions of movies grandpa
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 19:03
|
|
|
Mooey Cow posted:One scene that stuck out particularly was when the t-rex was sniffing on the car and turning its head and stuff. There was a super obvious spring-back when it stopped like it was just a big weight on a hydraulic lift (which it was). I guess it was just a frame in the original but when interpolated it got really noticeable. The CG stuff would have been animated more smoothly. The part where the TREX finally catches up the Big rear end Latina Teen hasn’t aged well either. You can totally tell the hoverboard is fake.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 19:06
|
|
|
i saw the remastered imax version of 2001 and it was the wrong aspect ratio < >
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 19:23
|
|
|
The Bloop posted:These are the same people that watch shows at the wrong aspect ratio and seem genuinely not to notice that everyone looks like they're in a funhouse mirror My wife is one of those people it drives me insane.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 20:41
|
|
|
why doesn't anybody make a 4:3 4k tv wtf
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 21:49
|
|
Associate Christ
|
Hammerite posted:you're wrong [obvious thing] is obvious and you're a moron if you don't see it I've never noticed [other obvious thing] though so only morons must complain about it
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
I watch all of my movies at double speed so I get 48fps.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:10
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:I agree, OP. the whole thing is actually super interesting. There is almost nothing identical to cinema tech 80 years ago: new projectors, new mediums, new sound systems, way more colours, way more clarity but 24fps seems somehow more central to calling something 'film' than actually being shot or projected using film lol, my man, no one invented new colors in the last 80 years
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:24
|
|
|
Dignity Van Houten posted:lol, my man, no one invented new colors in the last 80 years Remember when "all the colors of the rainbow" was a saying? LMAO you ever LOOKED at a rainbow? It hardly even has any! Think about what a poo poo world it was before we got all these new ones and you were stuck with those garbage rear end basic hues
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
GIF is the one true format.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
Videos are dumb i cant wait to go blind
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:53
|
|
|
Dignity Van Houten posted:lol, my man, no one invented new colors in the last 80 years Different display tech results in different colour spaces. Different types of film are included in that - that’s why Polaroids and Kodak photos have a signature ‘look’ to the colour. Modern cameras can capture HDR over a massive gamut. Modern film editing allows colour grading, allowing editors to pick that signature look on a shot by shot basis. Modern display and projection technology can accurately reproduce a much wider colour spaces at higher and more nuanced brightnesses. The end result is you can see colours in a modern cinema that you could never see 80 years ago, from both a technical and perceptual standpoint. Colour grading has changed the visual language of filmmaking irrevocably, too, just look at superhero orange and teal.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:15
|
|
|
Wait until you discover 144fps OP
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:33
|
|
|
I've always wondered why the plant signing in Little Shop of Horrors always looked so fluid when apparently it was filmed at 12 fps Basically the thing weighed like three tons and it was impossible for the puppeteers to move it fast enough to lip sync to Levi Stubbs' music so they had to film it in slow motion and then speed it up later. But why doesn't it look like poo poo? I'd think 12 fps would look terrible but since my kids watch the movie 50 times a day I have to say it looks flawless. What kinda fuckery is going on?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:42
|
|
|
your ears can't hear higher than 30 Hz anyway so why bother
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:55
|
|
|
itt: husband prepares argument for wife on justification for 100000 pixels, doesn't get sex afterwards
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 02:17
|
|
|
So is a 60+fps film guaranteed to look like poo poo? I mean I definitely agree with how lovely and non-filmic it can look in some examples, but is there anything you could to to make it better than traditional film?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 02:50
|
|
|
Probably not since your brain is accustomed to seeing 24fps films for 20/30/40+ years and a difference in framerate with a new amount of blur per frame for the same "movement speed" will be noticeable. Maybe a fully CG movie or something could work.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 02:57
|
|
|
anything under 480fps looks like dogshit, to me
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 03:04
|
|
|
Roumba posted:Probably not since your brain is accustomed to seeing 24fps films for 20/30/40+ years and a difference in framerate with a new amount of blur per frame for the same "movement speed" will be noticeable. Spoiler alert it doesn't work. In 60fps live-action superheroes look like cosplayers and CGI looks like a lovely game cutscene.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 04:04
|
|
|
Are movies still primarily shot on film these days? Is it like 60/40? Or is it like barely anything any more?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 04:28
|
|
|
other people posted:why doesn't anybody make a 4:3 4k tv wtf 240p is all you need
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 07:31
|
|
|
I just sawed the edges of my tv off
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 08:27
|
|
|
Chumbawumba4ever97 posted:Are movies still primarily shot on film these days? Is it like 60/40? Or is it like barely anything any more? I think Tarantino still does. Something about how using the same type of lens and film stock in different cameras will give you the same result, while digital camera sensors will be inconsistent. Why does CGI in movies always look so bad? Instead of recasting a dead actor they have an army of animators make a human body double that looks like a botched taxidermy.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 08:49
|
|
|
I watched a VHS of City of Angels in 120hz and it was really jarring how it made everything look like it was shot on a lovely 90s consumer camcorder.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 08:57
|
|
|
The Bloop posted:These are the same people that watch shows at the wrong aspect ratio and seem genuinely not to notice that everyone looks like they're in a funhouse mirror The worst is when the broadcaster fucks up the aspect ratio between the source material and what they're sending out so the picture is hosed up no matter what you do.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 09:07
|
|
|
The Bloop posted:[obvious thing] is obvious and you're a moron if you don't see it i didn't call anyone a moron though? i mean I can do, if you want.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 11:48
|
|
|
Meredith Baxter-Burnout posted:The worst is when the broadcaster fucks up the aspect ratio between the source material and what they're sending out so the picture is hosed up no matter what you do. Disney plus cropped all the Simpsons episodes to 16:9 so you couldn’t see that Duff, Duff lite and Duff dry all came from the same pipe
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:12
|
|
|
That loving Sned posted:Disney plus cropped all the Simpsons episodes to 16:9 so you couldn’t see that Duff, Duff lite and Duff dry all came from the same pipe The gently caress is this. Just burn it all down.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:20
|
|
|
you haven't really experienced short fat people until you've lived with a 21:9 ultrawide tv
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:31
|
|
|
Just lol if you haven’t evolved beyond screens yet
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:33
|
|
|
r u ready to WALK posted:you haven't really experienced short fat people until you've lived with a 21:9 ultrawide tv oh no the most aryan man in the world got squashed
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:37
|
|
|
Boomers watching Friends in 21:9, looks right to them. People are supposed to be that wide and enormous New York flats are affordable
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 12:52
|
|
|
r u ready to WALK posted:you haven't really experienced short fat people until you've lived with a 21:9 ultrawide tv Lol that woman in the back is built to swing a mining pick at some kind of orcs possibly
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 13:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 01:00 |
|
|
r u ready to WALK posted:you haven't really experienced short fat people until you've lived with a 21:9 ultrawide tv If there's just one person on screen at first it's like wait what if they really look like that am I being a bigot Then it's like no everything is like that ugh What I'm saying is that some real people are in a different aspect ratio and that's ok
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 13:40
|
|