|
fuf posted:[...] But yeah the british market is great if you don't wanna or can't trade. If something is critically lacking Mama England will figure something out for you. Unless it's oil.
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2022 16:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 10:06 |
|
|
The thought of chainsaw going vroom vroom should be enough to make the brain happy. It's maybe worth it if you have completely run out of manpower in a no migration country. But yeah, some numbers simply don't work out yet.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2022 13:36
|
|
|
Nitrousoxide posted:For a China run, should you just spend 30 years expanding your taxing ability rather than actually building your industry. I see that you are leaving something like 800k in weekly taxes on the table for lack of the government admin buildings In my experience that will ruin you as the wages for government will start catching up the income from taxation. Add government administration as needed for Institutions. As those cost several thousand bureucracy it will still amount to a sizeable amount of paper industry and government wages. It will eat away your inefficient taxation sooner or later.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2022 14:49
|
|
|
DJ_Mindboggler posted:My desire to have a simulated global currency market is tempered by the knowledge that even 3 more trade goods would melt everyone's CPUs. I wonder if the opposite is true as well. So removing meat, fruits, wine and other useless stuff will make the game blazingly fast. Also yes, I know that means that cows now eat grain to produce grain. Don't ask.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2022 01:57
|
|
|
Just split it into different buildings so that each building vomits out a single good. That would also help capitalists (and the AI) making less silly decisions.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2024 14:35
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 10:06 |
|
|
But the amount of goods would not increase, only the amount of different buildings.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2024 15:04
|
|