|
Pony: Deshawn. Llana is another potential, but gotta go with gut. Poison: David
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2021 07:53 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 22:12 |
|
Yeah I think if your vote is gone, the only thing you can do is play an idol (or some kind of other gimmick advantage like leaving tribal). You probably can't even play an idol nullifier.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2021 16:54 |
|
This was a really good episode. Between Shan and Sydney we've got some good potential villains, and between Liana and Naseer we've got some good potential heroes.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2021 14:30 |
|
Wow.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2021 03:25 |
|
Metis of the Hallways posted:I want to know why Sydney seemed to hate Heather. She made one mean comment about her that was completely random and we got no explanation beyond Sydney just being like that, which is tbh kinda enough. From EW's interview: quote:Why do you say "no comment" on Heather?
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2021 04:07 |
|
SLICK GOKU BABY posted:I think there's an unintentional but very interesting element to the way they've done the season so far. There's 3 idols and a bunch of advantages and poo poo, but for the most part they are all pretty much public knowledge to the other Survivors. I don't think anyone at this point has an extra vote or idol or anything that is actually hidden at this point. Shan's extra vote should be secret to everyone except Ricard.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2021 07:37 |
|
freeman posted:Showing that fake idol was probably meant to narrow their choice between him or Evvie. Either he shows you the fake because Evvie has it or knows you'll think that so he keeps both real and fake. If he just shows up and doesn't say anything she might guess between the 3 of them who has it. Except that Liana literally had immunity, so she really should have held onto it.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2021 09:46 |
|
Deshawn and Danny still had fears about an all-women alliance so they would probably prefer to chop Sydney than Naseer if they had to.
|
# ¿ Nov 6, 2021 04:25 |
|
I'm not sure doubling down should be what you should be doing, but okay. She also posted an earlier tweet before the episode of her/Liana/Deshawn/Danny with 'Melanin/Melanin/Melanin/Melanin'.
|
# ¿ Nov 6, 2021 06:03 |
|
Narcissus1916 posted:Its also weird to head to the merge with an entire team intact, so you have people saying how Deshawn or Danny are playing great games despite them only being in a handful of tribal. Michele also did that, I guess the difference is that she consistently had talking head moments despite never going to tribal. I'd say on the surface Danny and Ricard are playing good games, but we see so little of them it's hard to see if the show is charting a winner's story for them. Khanstant posted:I wonder how things would have gone if they didn't split the tribe up for this into two. ] Erika likely goes, no way she survives the longest in that immunity and I don't think the vote flips onto Naseer in such a large group.
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2021 05:29 |
|
That was a really good episode. I noticed they've dialed the advantages down a lot since the merge, and it's really helping. I feel like Ricard could win... but man I don't even know anymore. Unrelated but how many more episodes do we have left in the tank? 2? 3?
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2021 11:25 |
|
Narcissus1916 posted:I'm watching the "first" AUS Survivor season on 10Play (thanks VPN!) and its still a solid time. There's a serious Pagonging post-merge, but I'm still entertained. (This is the one with Lee the cricketer) Casting is super strong too. 2017 (the second season) is also really solid. I do think that the CvC and All-Stars seasons are iffy, because that's when overproduction and twists really come in, but that's me. Metis of the Hallways posted:I agree, I can't handle Australian Survivor. I hate how all Australian reality TV has to be this hour and a half event three time a week, makes it impossible to keep up. It's, unfortunately, a network requirement since they need to fill a certain number of hours/episodes. Hence why they have all those non-elimination episodes and twists to stretch the time out more. And honestly, Australian Survivor gets off light compared to something like Masterchef Australia. I like that one too, but it's basically an hour every day for five days a week that goes on for months.
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2021 07:45 |
|
The next Aus season is Blood vs Water, and Sandra and her daughter are on it, so that might be worth a watch just for the novelty.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2021 15:26 |
|
Capsaicin posted:Just finished Australian: Champs vs Contenders 2, and the final two was almost exactly like Chris/Twila from Vanuatu. One person just gave no reasons to vote for them and the other gave an amazing argument. To be perfectly fair, you looked at the F3 and who won immunity and go 'ah okay, so who do you choose to die to at FTC?'.
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2021 06:21 |
|
AU does some things really well, but they're also let down in other aspects by editing, forced non-elimination episodes and twists. Of course, US Survivor hasn't had the best track record with twists lately, so...
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2021 08:40 |
|
Raxivace posted:Erika's win is fine. She's not a great Survivor character the way someone like Sandra is, but her win doesn't really deserve the hate it seems to be getting online. I think half of it is also salt from people being angry that Xander got 0 votes. I think it's an alright win. Ricard was the better player, but that's just how it goes. I can't even say Erika was better at managing her threat, because people wanted her gone as soon as merge started.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2021 08:35 |
|
Ahahaha there are already people saying that Xander getting 0 votes was racism. Might stay off that section of the internet for a while.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2021 09:14 |
|
If I was Sydney, I would be pretty annoyed I was voted out because of the twist. And it makes sense that it ruffled Danny's feathers. He's an athlete. He trains to win. And then he does, only for someone to go, 'actually, no, you didn't win'. You can honestly see it in the contestant's faces after that when they go into a challenge. They're a lot more wary of whatever Jeff's selling.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2021 18:43 |
|
STAC Goat posted:Amanda was basically just a terrible public speaker who also had the bad luck of teaming up with two of the better winners/talkers of all time. Otherwise she was a pretty great player and I'd say a good social player as well. And she lasted longer her third time than Russell so hopefully that makes him mad. Parvati's charming but I don't think she's actually that great in front of a jury. Getting a 4-3 win over Amanda (and she very nearly lost if not for Eliza) is not the best performance ever.
|
# ¿ Dec 19, 2021 09:44 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 22:12 |
|
Cast bios for next season!
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2022 21:34 |